[NEW VID RELEASED] Firefighters talk of explosives on @ 9/11

Understandable. Talking about innocent people that died when they didn't have to, especially if you personally lost someone close can really be sour grapes.

However, I see it as these guys (yes, conspiracy dudes) doing it out of respect FOR them. If you lost your 28 year old daughter, mother of 2 little boys in the towers and had a bus load of GOOD and concerning questions about what happened that day, mayb you would see why people do this.

Look at it this way, the 9/11 Commission has said that the information in the Official Story is not correct, and some of it was lies.

Also, there have been God knows how many pictures from CNN's 9/11 Memorial of victims, that were EDITED (proven) months before 9/11 and even people's obituaries written days and months before 9/11. When confronted by this, CNN removes their pictures.

Check the CNN memorial page now. Look at all the missing pictures. http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/lists/by-name/index.html

Alot of these people, there's no information on at all.

 

Controlled Demolition Incorporated... the company hired to do cleanup at WTC after the attacks. I can prove that in the same context as placing explosives in buildings, an employee from CDI himself, on video, admits he was in the WTC and compared the size of the steel beams in the WTC to that of the steel he was placing explosives on. Does this prove explosives were in the WTC? No, but this does prove that someone who DOES this for a living, was inside the WTC looking at the steel beams. Let me know if you want to see this.

"BTW- Was Pearl Harbor faked too to pull us into WWII?" --- Nothing I've heard/seen would convince me that it was faked.

"It's really not even worth arguing about. You're going to continue to ignore reality no matter what is said."-- Right back at you buddy.

 

As a win? I'm not here to "Win" anything. I'm not here to win a popularity contest or to simply "fit in" with everyone else. I'm not here for "rep" points or to try and convince anyone. I'm here to show things some people haven't seen before. To give you a background of me, up until 2004 I was all for the OS and was all for the war. I figured, if they did this to us then we can't just sit back and let them get away with it.

So, I'm here to try and show you guys that can somewhat try and see this information regarding the 9/11 attacks with an unbiased eye.

Atleast 7 of the 19 hijackers on 9.11 are ALIVE and well.
http://guardian.150m.com/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm

 

A few things some people might find interesting:

Atleast 7 of the 19 hijackers on 9.11 are ALIVE and well.
http://guardian.150m.com/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm

Remember the passport found unscathed on the grounds that went through fire and brimstone near the WTC of the hijacker? Well, the guy in the passport is still alive. The governments reaction? "Oh!.... It must have been stolen and used by the real hijacker!"

I found this next piece interesting. Found it out a few months ago, and I find the story so compelling that it's told under the national media. But on 9/11, there was a van stopped blocks away from the WTC. On the side of the van was a mural painted with the twin towers, and "9/11" along with an airliner.
http://southeastasianews.org/rahm_arrested_zio14.jpg
What's interesting is, on police radio they talk about it, call in a bomb squad, and say the two guys who stopped the van are in custody. But they never release what information they got out of these guys! This actually points to the OS opposed to an inside job, but I think it's interesting that a small of the U.S. knows about this.

 

9/11 Propoganda:

In the video "The 9/11 Hotel" It is claimed a little girl snapped this famous picture of one of the planes striking the tower...

Well, the photographer that snapped it is named Rob Howard.

<object width="510" height="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nht8mI3VHr0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nht8mI3VHr0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="1280" height="745"></embed></object>

3:15 Mark...

Narrator -- “Christine and her daughter joined the crowds and the confusion, beneath the twin towers.”

Christine-- “Everyone was gazing up; somebody said… there has been a light plane goes into the tower. Om- god and we looked up at it. And I said to my daughter, I said, she had her camera
Take a photo of it, because you are never going to see that again. You know we are never going to experience that again... And as she was sort of pointing it up to snap the picture, at that point the second plane comes in”

Narrator-- “this is the photograph Christine’s daughter took.”

here is a copy of Christine's photo:


Here is RoB Howards photo:


Here is a side by side comparison of the two, when Rob's photo is cropped.


Christine lied about taking the photo, Now… why would they need to fake a plane photo and lie about an account?

Now, there is a famous picture of a man who jumped out of the WTC. There was a documentary, looking for his identity. Long story short, they find his identity, and have his sister on at the end.

If you look up the sister, she is a professional actor. On her RESUME online, she list that 9/11 documentary under her WORK that she has done. How wrong is it, as an actor, to claim your work as in a documentary where you portray "yourself" Odd? yes.

If you want proof of this I can find it for you, it'll takwe a few but i can find it.

 

"1,270 Architects/Engineers Reveal Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition at World Trade Center on 9/11"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20100907/pl_usnw/DC60870

ormer US Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK) and Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Discuss Scientific Findings

National Press Club, Washington DC, 2:00 pm, Thursday, September 9, 2010

WASHINGTON, Sept. 7 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Thursday September 9, 2010, Gravel and Gage will host a central press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, presenting hard evidence that all three WTC skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, in NYC were destroyed by explosive controlled demolition.

Senator Gravel notes, "Critically important evidence has come forward after the original government building reports were completed."

This press conference will be webcast at AE911Truth.org and hosted concurrently in cities throughout the world.* Following the conference, there will be a mock debate during which public statements made by government investigators and other defenders of the official account will be presented and responded to in multimedia format. "They refuse to debate us in person," says Gage, "so we will let their public statements represent them."

Gage will release a media-friendly summary of his organization's findings, which are based on forensic evidence as well as video and eyewitness testimony that were omitted from official reports. He will show evidence that the WTC Twin Towers were not destroyed by jet plane impacts or fires, but by pre-set explosives and incendiaries. The non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will also call for a grand jury investigation of government report lead engineers Shyam Sunder and John Gross of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. "They were in a position to know the evidence we have been presenting," says Gage.

Also speaking will be Florida State Professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who coined the academic term State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD). Prof. deHaven-Smith has appeared on Good Morning America, the Today Show, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw, CBS Nightly News with Dan Rather, and other national TV/radio shows.

The DC press conference will be accessible via webcast AE911Truth.org, 2:00 pm September 9, 2010.

* For information on satellite press conferences in your area, contact CongressionalOutreachTeam [at] ae911truth.org.

-----------------------------------------

you're right. those 1270 are wrong. my bad.

 

lol those reports are fact.


Where would the smokescreen be? The WTC falls to the ground from explosives. There had to be a clear, physical reasong for the buildings to collapse from the everyday Joe.