1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

New historical ootp4 league?

Discussion in 'Fantasy Sports' started by haven, Apr 9, 2002.

  1. RunninRaven

    RunninRaven Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2000
    Messages:
    15,272
    Likes Received:
    3,219
    Think about it like this, DBC. With the new historical league, if you stick with it long enough, you will be able to fully experience the entire career of one Tim Wakefield and Flash Gordon.
     
  2. Band Geek Mobster

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    6,019
    Likes Received:
    17
    So we'd start with 16 historical teams, how many seasons till new teams come around?

    Anyone have a link that lists in chronological order when teams enter the league?

    Couldn't we count the # of interested GM's and then fast forward to a year that every GM would have a team?
     
  3. Castor27

    Castor27 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    10,199
    Likes Received:
    1,634
    I had wanted to talk with Haven before even mentioning anything but since Manny brought it up I guess I will go ahead and discuss it here. I had in the past couple of days started considering beginning a new league. I know with the baseball season starting up there would be lots of interest(myself included in this) to starting a new league with current rosters(there is about to be released in the next couple of weeks an extremely comprehensive roster set including most minor leaguers from every franchise.) THe release of said roster set will also coincide with the ending of my coaching season so I would actually have time to sit down and run the league. If we get to the point where we decide to do away with the old league and there is still interest in starting a new current roster league I will be more than happy to run it. If Haven decides to keep the old league and wants to run only one league I would be willing to take over that league, but the updates will probably be sporadic for at least a couple more weeks until i can get thru with coaching,

    CK
     
  4. Band Geek Mobster

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    6,019
    Likes Received:
    17
    I'd be most in favor of 2 leagues ran by 2 different people over any of the other options...
     
  5. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,829
    Likes Received:
    5,754
    I second that.

    To answer your question, BGM, here is when each existing franchise started play:

    AL
    Boston - 1901
    NY Yankees - 1901
    Toronto - 1977
    Baltimore - 1901 (Was Milwaukee Brewers in 1901, then St. Louis Browns from 1902-1953, Baltimore from 1954 - present)
    Tampa Bay - 1998
    Cleveland - 1901
    Chicago White Sox - 1901
    Minnesota - 1901 (Was the Original Washington Senators from 1901-1960, then Minnesota from 1961 - present)
    Detroit - 1901
    Kansas City - 1969
    Oakland - 1901 (Was the Philadelphia Athletics from 1901-1954, then Kansas City Athletics from 1955-1967, Oakland from 1968 - present)
    Seattle - 1977
    Anaheim - 1961 (was the Los Angeles Angels until 1966, then California Angels until recently)
    Texas - 1961 (was the 2nd version of the Washington Senators until 1971, then the Texas Rangers from 1972 to the present)
    Atlanta - before 1901 (was Boston Braves from pre 1901 to 1952, then Milwaukee Braves from 1953-1965, then the Atlanta Braves from 1966 to the present)
    New York Mets - 1962
    Philadelphia - before 1901
    Montreal - 1969
    Florida - 1993
    Cincinnati - before 1901
    St. Louis - before 1901
    Pittsburgh - before 1901
    Houston - 1962
    Chicago Cubs - before 1901
    Milwaukee - weird one, 1969 in the AL as the Seattle Pilots, then moved to Milwaukee to become the Brewers in 1970...moved to the National League in 1998
    Los Angeles - before 1901 - was Brooklyn Dodgers until 1958, then LA Dodgers starting in 1958
    San Francisco - before 1901 - was New York Giants until 1958, then SF Giants starting in 1958
    San Diego - 1969
    Colorado - 1993
    Arizona - 1998

    Or you could just go to here:

    :D
     
  6. Zac D

    Zac D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2000
    Messages:
    2,733
    Likes Received:
    46
    I'm cool with any option... historical sounds like it has really, really great potential to be awesome, though.
     
  7. Castor27

    Castor27 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    10,199
    Likes Received:
    1,634
    Out of curiosity I started to sim the 1986 season. i will post a website to see results when I get through the playoffs. At last check the AStros were leading the west. Mets leading east. Tigers in AL East and Angels in AL west.
     
  8. SamCassell

    SamCassell Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    9,536
    Likes Received:
    2,434
    Couldn't we count the # of interested GM's and then fast forward to a year that every GM would have a team

    Based on Manny's list, the first expansion teams in baseball history were in 1961 (Washington and LA). If we had 23 interested owners, we'd need to fast forward to the 1969 season.
     
  9. Castor27

    Castor27 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    10,199
    Likes Received:
    1,634
    Here is my 1986 season. I really feel this is how it should have been :)


    http://users2.ev1.net/~chkemp/1986/league.htm

    Of note Nolan Ryan announced on day one of the season that he would retire. I deleted the email messages so it does not show up but I thought that was kinda funny.

    CK
     
    #29 Castor27, Apr 10, 2002
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2002
  10. DrewP

    DrewP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    26
    I vote "a". I have been busy with school work laytely and havent been able to do much in the league. now that I have more time, i can participate more...... Historical leagues are cooler.
     
  11. Anticope

    Anticope Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    I'm open to anything. This historical league looks pretty cool though.
     
  12. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm also of the opinion that 2 leagues are too much of a burden to be placed on a single individual. Therefore, perhaps haven could hire an assistant commish to handle the duties of one of the leagues.
     
  13. Smallz88

    Smallz88 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    0
    ill do either option
     
  14. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,836
    Likes Received:
    5,434
    I think B is the best option.

    I love the idea of a historical league, but there are many in the current baseball sim who have built their teams for the future, and probably deserve the chance to see if those teams will compete. Personally, I'm pressed for time right now as it is, so I'm only likely to participate in one. (preferably historical) I'd like to see less frequent simming anyway, so that full seasons don't go by in two weeks. :)

    However, if that is too much stress on haven (running two leagues), perhaps one of the other owners of OOTP would be willing to run one league.
     

Share This Page