Or people may want to add controversy because the format stinks and they want it blown up. Most coaches and fans and media want some form of playoff, only a few powerful higher-ups in Univ Admin and Conference Reps want to keep it the same. Also, if true folks like Mangioni tanked Texas, they might not want that public. Someone can make a plenty clear argument for Texas this week or next by simply stating they have the best season resume and the only victory between the consensus top competitors. In all honestly, Florida beating Bama or not, it is pretty clear OU and Texas will have the best objective resumes (as reflected clearly in the computers among 1 loss teams). The argument has to be Florida is hotter, better passes the eyeball test or you need multiple conferences represented--all pretty wishy-washy arguments, because the Bama victory doesn't stack up to the OU victory, Texas' loss was better, and Texas' conference is stronger in all objective metrics. Overall I am not saying Texas will be ahead of Florida with a non-overwhelming Florida victory, but I am saying it will be very close and flip a coin, like this week with Texas-OU.
