Not a game player at all, just thought it would be interesting to post. In fact, I'm not really sure if I'm going to purchase this game at all.
Harden would be higher if he could play a lick of defense, so I feel his rating is justified. Asik being rated so low is a bit puzzling to me. Personally, I would rank Asik around 79 or 80. Other than that, I have no problems with with the other rankings.
So....how are they explaining that Brooks is better than Parsons? Brooks has got to be like a 66 at best. He's the 3rd best PG on the team, he was ONCE good but that was ages ago.
So I just got nba 2k14 (ps3) and these ratings are still there! What should the ratings be according to you guys? By the way its very annoying to see chandler parsons with a generic face and moving like asik..
keep in mind, height makes a big difference in 2k, Brooks might be rated highly but he is so short that all he can do is shoot open 3's... it makes sense for his rating, but Asik should be rated a bit higher
I think as of right now on the ps3 and 360 the ratings stay same, but on next gen versions they update.
