well I like those lowered ratings and I dont mind Yao at 83 as long as his key attributes are right up there. But one thing I need to point out is nba2k's lead designer Mike Wang has left 2k for EA sports...thus this year live 10 has improved quite a bit. anyway Im getting both games
Greg ****ing Oden is rated higher than Scola and Kobe is a 97, I am officially not getting this game. They already make it so people can only use Lebron and Kobe online, they have just made it even worse making only 4 players ranked in the 90s.
I wonder who rated my thread 2 stars? I'm just passing along info... Anyways, here's a screen of the Rox D-League team from someone's Piston's association: Here's a computer AI trade involving Hou:
Ok, I think this thread needs to move to Hangout or the Fantasy Basketball forum. All these arguments over player ratings in a video game has nothing to do with the real Houston Rockets.
I don't understand why you're bashing 2k10 for OVERALL ratings. There are some skills which players excel at and some that they are terrible at. Luis Scola would have a terrible jumping/dunking/3 point shooting rating and that would pull him down. Ariza just hasn't proven himself in the regular season to have a higher ranking. Brooks might be extremely fast and an excellant scorer but he is deficient in a lotta other areas. You can compare individual ratings for a specific area (i.e. quickness, 3 point shooting) but not overall ratings IMO.
chuck hayes post d is a c+????? thats hilarious. and tevor ariza is a better perimeter defender than ariza??? thank god for automatic updates throughout the season and hopefully this **** will get fixed.
Actually I think it kinda does. Its kinda non homer perspective on how good players are. Just my opinion though.
There is a video game store in Katy that is mom and pop styled. Sold Madden early. Will I tell you guys on here? Nope. Do a little detective work.
Post D = Blocking. That is why his ratings on Post D are low. Of course, I'm sure his strength rating will be like 85+ in the game.
Which is why I think there isn't much sense arguing over these ratings. The dispute isn't on what the player does, but rather how much of what that player does ends up in the game and how we define terms like "post D".
