"The transfer or Seller should only make changes A, C or E" while question 18b is on section B. Do you morons even read the stuff you post. @Ottomaton @Amiga they're not even allowed to amend section B! His own article says you can't make any changes to section B. Also show us where there are initials anywhere on the application? WTF are you even talking about.
The same form that's INCOMPLETE without the proper documentation needed to process hence the entire form is invalid. If you conduct a search warrant on a suspect and later its found out the search warrant was invalid all evidence they find on the search is invalid and inadmissible in court. You're a lying dipshit who's not very smart in any way
If thats the real form which it indeed is then the form is INCOMPLETE as the seller needs an ID that has the buyers address on it. That's required by law. If Joe bidens doj tried prosecuting trump based on a fake search warrant that wasn't properly filled out the same dipshits @Commodore @Salvy would be spinning conspiracy after conspiracy non stop. When it happens to bidens own son the morons say nothing and claim @AroundTheWorld that bidens doj is weaponizating the doj against Trump. It's just amazing how utterly stupid and brainwashed half of America is But it doesn't matter. That's the entire game plan for Republicans. Spew a bunch of conspiracy and disinformation without hard evidence and confuse voters and make them think that biden is similar to trump. It's what @Os Trigonum has been doing for 2+ years and why he has a 450+ page thread with nothing but conspiracies. These folks are scumbags and game the media to help trump.
What is this then? There should have been a section for pronouns so Hunter could have put he/they/high @Os Trigonum
THIS IS RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION!!! THE ORIGINAL FORMS HAD CHEETO DUST BECAUSE THE SELLER WAS EATING CHEETOS WHEN POOR INNOCENT HUNTER WALKED INTO THE GUN STORE. THIS IS FAKE NEWS!!!!
You are required by law to use an ID that has an address on it (driver's license, etc). If a passport is being used as an ID there has to be a secondary ID that's used also to verify the person's address. The owner of the shop testified under oath that he wrote Hunter's car registration on 18b. If you look at 18b on the form you posted the box is blank. There's nothing there. The application is invalid by law cuz it doesn't have proper ID verification. If you wanna talk about "weaponization" of the doj like the right wing donkeys say @AroundTheWorld look no further than this case
You can't argue on the merits of what I'm saying so you pivot to some unrelated garbage cuz you're a dipshit moron who's incapable of breaking down information. Back to spewing conspiracies for the braindead MAGAts
I'd be interested in what Joey would do if his son did face jail time. The stakes for this are far from that, but enough to cause him grief.
Can someone remind me why this case is important again? (nevermind. @Buck Turgidson already asked this)
My guess is that he would try and be supportive and understanding of his son. But no way to tell unless it happens.
It’s important because it is the president’s son. It’s also an example that far from the DoJ being used by the current to go after political enemies is also going after family members of the current president and also political allies. The minutia of the case though aren’t really important unless Hunter Biden were to run for office or be appointed to some position of public trust. None of which appear likely. Also given the level Of severity of the charges and that this is a first time felony it’s unlikely Hunter Biden sees jail time even if convicted. I said the same about Trump in the hush money conviction.
That should also depend on whether, after a guilty verdict, the defendant shows remorse and signs that they would not repeat the crime.
I finally read about it. The defense brought this up, and the judge allowed the admission of it, while asking, and I'll summarize, 'Do you have evidence that Hunter didn’t check that box (11e)?' The prosecution has rested, and the defense is up next week. We’ll see if they actually go with that angle - either arguing that the original form is not admissible as evidence (a technicality) or that Hunter actually didn't check that box. Sit back and wait. You're jumping the gun.
Federal charges are hard to beat if history is any indication. I am sure he has very good lawyers so he has a shot. It has been very interesting to see the contrast in media coverage between the high profile trials in the last month. Ultimately, it looks like both will result in guilty verdicts.
This is not a correct statement of the law. United States v. Leon, 468 US 897 - Supreme Court 1984 - Google Scholar Good faith reliance on a subsequently invalidated search warrant does not necessarily invalidate the search and render evidence discovered inadmissible. There is an analysis of the purpose of the exclusionary rule, and whether that purpose would be served by application to the case.
