Yet the administration didn't do a single thing on behalf of Hunter or his partners. Not a single damn thing the administration ever did on behalf of them. Not one action I can tell you what the trump admin did to help saudis over and over. Your comparisons are a joke
Except getting the prosecutor in Ukraine fired (by making threats about US taxpayer money being provided or withheld) who was investigating Hunter Biden's Burisma - and then publicly bragging about it.
You're still spewing the same bullshit that you know isn't true. During the trump impeachment hearing trump officals said themselves removing the prosecutor was done on behalf of us policy. No matter how many bullshit conspiracies you wanna spin the prosecutor was fired on behalf of the republicans. Why are such a disingenuous low life troll? You have been told a million times that Republicans demanded his firing but you'll keep spewing the same bullshit. Do you realize the prosecutor that obama admin fired WAS NOT INVESTIGATING BURISMA OR HUNTER. The prosecutor was on the book of burisma. The last thing they wanted was him being fired We have the dumbest mfers in this thread.
Jesus christ you are one dumb moron. Please show me where burisma demanded the prosecutor be fired ? Please do show me. Please show us where burisma demanded his firing
https://www.newsweek.com/does-ukraine-have-kompromat-joe-biden-opinion-1818052 Does Ukraine Have Kompromat on Joe Biden? | Opinion MAX ABRAHMS , PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AT NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ON 8/8/23 AT 10:31 AM EDT Throughout the Trump presidency, the mainstream media constantly suggested that Russia had so-called "kompromat" on the president—embarrassing materials used as a weapon of influence through blackmail. We all remember the daily deluge: "Does Russia have Kompromat on Trump?" CNN asked. "A Russian Word Americans Need To Know: 'Kompromat,'" Greg Myre wrote at NPR, concluding that "Russia may have compromising material on President-elect Donald Trump." The Guardian agreed, writing there was "apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on Trump... that happened during Trump's trips to Moscow." Jonathan Chait wrote in New York Magazine that Russia had "secret leverage over Trump," and "a great deal of incriminating information was confirmed," a claim reiterated by the BBC in an article called "Russia and the art of 'kompromat'." The Washington Post was obsessed with the conspiracy theory, publishing numerous articles about it, as did the Daily Beast with a steady stream of articles. Even the New York Times promoted the conspiracy theory that Russia had kompromat on the President, based on a brief meeting attended by one of Trump's sons in Trump Tower. Entire books were written on all the kompromat that the Kremlin supposedly had on President Trump, which were eagerly cited across mainstream media. And what was this kompromat that Russia had over Trump, per our august media institutions? Putin apparently had sex tapes of Trump with prostitutes peeing on him. It seems so ridiculous that anyone—let alone our most august media institutions—believed this in hindsight. We now know that the pee tape stemmed from Hillary Clinton's campaign. But the kompromat conspiracy theory was essential for the Democrats' narrative that Russia possessed boundless influence over the president. For the Washington Post, the (made-up) kompromat meant Trump was "an agent of Russia." For CNN, it meant Trump was a "Russian asset." The exact same talking point was repeated ad nauseam across the media in places like The Atlantic, The New Republic, Slate, Wired, and nightly on MSNBC. The specific nature of the kompromat or how Trump was a Russian agent or asset was never fixed or established, and depended upon the creativity of journalist imagination. Max Boot perfectly captured the zeitgeist in an article for the Washington Post entitled, "Here are 18 reasons Trump could be a Russian asset." All the kompromat talk swiftly ended the moment Joe Biden became president because surely no foreign government could have any dirt on him. This left no one to ask the obvious question: Could Ukrainian officials have kompromat on Joe, given all the allegations of his corruption in Ukraine? It's a much more reasonable question about Joe Biden than it ever was when posed as a certainty about Trump. After all, Hunter Biden was paid many millions of dollars by the shady Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, despite having no qualifications for the job that anyone could point to beyond being the son of the Vice President at the time—which proved fortunate when his father fired the general prosecutor of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin, who had begun an investigation into the Burisma-Hunter gravy train. And yet, in obvious contrast with their obsession with Russia's kompromat on Trump, the mainstream media has lined up to dismiss the corruption allegations against Biden as a nothingburger. This has been no easy feat, and yet the media has valiantly obliged, arguing repeatedly that Hunter Biden was paid by Burisma for reasons that had nothing to do with the fact that his father was the Vice President at the time overseeing U.S. relations with Ukraine—and that Joe did not have any knowledge of his son's highly lucrative business dealings. And they would have you believe Vice President Biden fired Shokin because Shokin was corrupt. The latest evidence exposes the media's talking points as pure propaganda. On July 31, 2023, Devon Archer testified to the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability about both Joe's relationship to Burisma and why he fired Shokin. Archer was Hunter Biden's close friend who served alongside him on the board of Burisma. Under oath, Archer testified that Burisma paid Hunter millions of dollars solely because his father was Vice President. Burisma would have gone out of business without "the brand" and the brand was Joe, Archer testified. Per Archer, Joe Biden was involved in the racket; he was put on speakerphone in business meetings at least 20 times. Archer also testified that Shokin was fired by Joe not for being a corrupt prosecutor but for investigating the millions of dollars Burisma was paying Hunter, whom the company owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, said was stupider than his dog. In subsequent interviews, Archer has even more clearly confirmed that Shokin was fired for pursuing Burisma's enormous payoffs to the Biden family. All of this is well-known to Ukrainian officials. Shokin himself released a video directly rebutting Biden loyalists in the American media, in which he explains in detail why Vice President Biden threatened Ukraine's president with holding back critical American aid if Shokin was not immediately replaced with a dud. "The depiction of these investigations as dormant has nothing to do with reality of the facts," Shokin said. "Mr. Biden was told that we were going to start questioning his son and others, Archer and others, all involved in the Burisma case. And everyone understood very well that this fight was going to end badly for them... Biden had understood what was looming... We were about to reach the outcome of this case. Having understood all this, Biden used all the unofficial means at his disposal... Biden was acting on behalf of his own interests, for his family... Joe Biden had reason to fear that all this would eventually fall on his son." For his pains, Biden replaced Shokin with a new prosecutor, who promptly closed the Burisma investigation. Nothing that has emerged recently has the shock value of a pee tape. But perhaps that's because it's all true. It is also consistent with the materials found on Hunter's notorious laptop, which contains emails from Burisma executives pleading with Biden to use his influence to stop the pressure on them by Ukrainian officials.
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-releases-devon-archers-transcribed-interview-transcript/ LOL the entire Devon testimony is online. Please quote me where Devon said burisma asked the prosecutor to be fired ? It's insane how you idiots don't realize the prosecutor was on the side of burisma. He was fired BECAUSE HE WAS NOT INVESTIGATING BURISMA. He was ON THE BOOKS OF BURISMA LOL. Good God you people are morons https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html
Why in the world would you be naïve, ignorant, or just dumb enough to take Shokin at his word about accusations against Shokin?? That's like me posting a clip of Trump claiming he's not a liar as proof that he's not a liar. After being corrected OVER AND OVER again about the facts in this case you continue to either just simply not understand because you are dumb (I don't think you are), or you are just a troll with unlimited energy for spreading misinformation. I swear I have telemarketers selling me solar panels who are less persistent then you.
lmao Burisma paid off Hunter Biden to get the prosecutor prosecuting them fired via Hunter's dad Then Burisma paid off the Atlantic Council to get the story spun their (and Biden's) way Couldn't make this up if you tried.
LMAO…. So you can’t prove Archer said they were fired…. Like you claimed… So you lied and are trying to spin it…. Can’t even provide a link to the original article but post a screenshot. Don’t your people have any sort of honor?
You genuinely the dumbest mfer on this forum. Sincerely. The corrupt prosecutor was on the side of burisma you moron. Why the **** would burisma want him fired?!?!
Rep. Jim Jordan: The request from Mr. ‑‑ from Mykola Zlochevsky and Vadym to Mr. Biden and/or if you said it was to you, the request for help from whom to deal with what pressure? Mr. Archer: The request ‑‑ you know, basically the request is like, can D.C. help? But there were not ‑‑ you know, I’m not going to ‑‑ there were not ‑‑ it wasn’t like ‑‑ there weren’t specific, you know, can the big guy help? It was ‑‑ it’s always this amorphous, can we get help in D.C.? @AroundTheWorld just stated that it was a fact that they asked Joe biden to fire the prosecutor. These morons just make up things on the fly then get upset when ppl call them dipshit morons. These people aren't even American.
Why do you think I call these people disingenuous scumbags ? Everyone here flames me for calling them mean words but that's all they are and I'll call it like I see it. These people want to destroy democracy
You said it was a FACT that they demanded the prosecutor be fired from joe biden. Please show us this fact. You said Devon said but no where does it state this so please share your "facts" Whats so hard?!
Their so effin dumb. Their trying tell folks that 1 +1 =3 The prosecutor that was fired was corrupt and WAS NOT PROPERLY INVESTIGATING burisma. That's why the Republicans wanted him fired Why the **** would burisma want the guy who's in their pocket fired?!?! Good God these people are effin dumb
