I swear I read this after posting my fear about Cohen's fear; Amnesty blasts U.S.-led war on terror Report: Conflict partly to blame for human rights crisis The Associated Press Updated: 8:39 a.m. ET May 26, 2004 LONDON - The U.S.-led war on terror has produced the most sustained attack on human rights and international law in 50 years, Amnesty International said in its annual report Wednesday. Irene Khan, secretary general of the human rights group, condemned terrorist assaults by groups such as al-Qaida, saying they posed a threat to security around the world. But she criticized the response of the U.S.-led “coalition of the willing,” saying its powerful governments were ignoring international laws by sacrificing human rights in the “blind pursuit” of security. “The global security agenda promoted by the U.S. administration is bankrupt of vision and bereft of principle,” Khan said in a statement. “Violating rights at home, turning a blind eye to abuses abroad, and using pre-emptive military force where and when it chooses have damaged justice and freedom, and made the world a more dangerous place.” "Indiscriminate and disproportionate" means Amnesty said the U.S.-led war on terror continued to be waged using indiscriminate and disproportionate means. The report cites the hundreds of foreign nationals who remain in indefinite detention without charge or trial in U.S. custody at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It also details alleged unlawful killings of civilians by coalition troops in Iraq and allegations of abuse of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. soldiers. The recent publication of photographs of U.S. troops torturing and humiliating Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad was met with international condemnation. “By failing to protect the rights of those who may be guilty, governments endanger the rights of those who are innocent and put us all at risk,” Khan said. The report criticized several governments, including those of Spain, France and Uzbekistan, which it said have introduced “regressive” anti-terrorist legislation and restrictions on freedom since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Britain was singled out for holding 14 foreign nationals under anti-terrorism laws that allow indefinite detention without charge of trial. The laws have been criticized by lawmakers, civil rights groups and Muslim associations. British police disclosed last month that more than half the 572 people arrested in anti-terror raids in Britain since Sept. 11, 2001 have been released without charge, and fewer than one in five have been charged with terrorism-related offenses. European asylum policies criticized Amnesty also criticized several European nations — including Portugal, Spain, France, Britain, Ireland and Malta — for tough new policies on asylum seekers. Khan said she was heartened by millions of people who took to the streets in capitals around the world to protest the war in Iraq, Spaniards who marched following the March 11 terrorist attacks in Madrid, and the World Social Forum in Brazil. “Governments need to listen,” she said. “In times of uncertainty, the world needs not only to fight against global threats but to fight for global justice.” The report also said that Iraq and the war on terror have obscured the greatest human rights challenge in recent history — the tendency of many developing countries to spend billions of dollars a year on weapons instead of tackling poverty. Khan said there is a risk that U.N. Millennium Development Goals such as reducing child mortality and halving the number of people without access to clean water, will not be achieved because resources have been diverted to the war on terror. Khan reiterated calls for support of Amnesty International’s 2004-2006 plan, adopted at the group’s international council meeting in Mexico in August 2003. It urges governments to resist committing abuses of human rights under the guise of the war on terror, to improve the rights of women, to reform and strengthen the justice system and to abolish the death penalty. © 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Come on, MacBeth, you know that Amnesty International is a bunch of pinko-commie left leaning socialist Utopians, right?
No joke, if I find the time and the ambition, I'm thinking of making a list of all the experts in their fields, from diplomats and intel officials pre-war to the Human Rights Watch, the Army War College, several high ranking generals, strategic think tanks etc., ther criticisms, the reason given by war supporters for why we shouldn't listen to them ( maybe with a key code, for ex. HB stands for Hates Bush, Lib; obviously liberal, etc.) and, most telling of all, how they've been proven right. Might even include special section of war supporters repeating back to us stuff like "Intel is never certain." as though we weren't yelling that at the wall pre-war. Think I'll call it " Shot While Attempting To Escape.", which the South African Govt. used to have an abbreviation for to keep record keeping easier. Wanna help?
Sure... Call or email me to coordinate it. I am pretty good at research, but am much better at writing.
