1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

My Case for Jimmy Garoppolo

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Two Sandwiches, Feb 1, 2017.

  1. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    I watched quite a bit of him leading up to the draft and i thought that he was a raw young prospect that would take considerable time to turn into anything valuable if ever. I liked him as sort of a Tom Savage sort of pick, but I was really high on Derek Carr and thought the Texans should use their 2nd rounder on him because I thought he was the best QB in the draft and that he'd be available there allowing a total coup of getting Clowney and Carr in the same draft. Most here strongly disagreed with me and thought we should pass on Clowney for Manziel, Bridgewater, Bortles, or Sammy Watkins (one guy)
     
  2. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    13,046
    Likes Received:
    8,347
    Forget about Jimmy G. Their are teams higher in the first round and that are interested in him. Texans are not giving up a first rounder for him.
     
  3. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,134
    Likes Received:
    15,071
    So, I was bored, so I went back and reviewed your comments on Carr leading up to the draft, as well as others in the same threads.

    Most people agreed that to get Carr in the second round would be excellent, including me, though I wanted a trade up back into the first for Bridgewater or Manziel (acknowedgling with every post I made about Manziel that he would be either boom or bust, and had huge bust potential. I just wanted someone to solve the QB crisis, as I saw it back then).

    The best compliments you gave to Carr is that you said he might be the best passer in the draft, and that if his name was Manning, he may be the first quarterback taken, but from what I understand, from his name. You did call him supremely talented, but you said there was a ton of risk involved with taking him, and that he was not nearly seasoned enough. After the first round, there were reports the Texans would take Carr or Garoppolo with the first pick of the second, and everyone was excited, including you, for either quarterback.

    In another post, though, you agreed with Mcshay in that all the QBs from that draft were overrated, which was true for everyone EXCEPT Carr.

    I did see references you made to predicting we draft Clowney and Carr during the November before the draft, but I didn't go that far back.

    Also, aound that draft, you also called Anthony Barr, Travardo Williams.


    So let's not paint a totally rosy picture that you were the knight in shining armor for Carr around here.

    Many here wanted him in the second round, especially after we didn't draft a quarterback in the first. Quite a few wanted Jimmy, as well.

    For the most part, those that wanted someone other than Clowney wanted Mack leading up to the draft, except for a few people, and one crazy guy (not sure who that was, maybe me) that wanted Manziel, while acknowledging that he was a potential huge bust. I find it easy to admit when I'm wrong, though.
     
    #103 Two Sandwiches, Feb 4, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2017
    zeeshan2 likes this.
  4. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    That's a fair and accurate accounting of the things I said here, and I did think that there was risk involved with taking Carr because I was worried that ANY struggles early on would lead to Texans fans going absolutely nuts....similar to how things are with Osweiler now. That said, I had been pulling for the Texans to draft him before his final season in college started.....I just wasn't posting here in those days.

    The comment about Barr.....well it was hyperbole. He's nowhere near that bad, but I was just saying that I saw him as little more than an athletic freak who didn't have a very polished game and that there's no way he should have been in the conversation for the top overall pick. Face it, we'd be talking about him as a total bust if the Texans picked him #1 overall.
     
  5. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    What did he say about Mallet and Osweiler?
     
  6. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,898
    Likes Received:
    8,001
    It's simple, if Belichek gives him to you then you know he sucks because he will need a qb shortly so why unload talent. It's a no win situation.
     
    Bobbythegreat likes this.
  7. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    18,462
    Likes Received:
    13,317
    I liked Jimmy G more than Carr coming out in the draft.

    Time will tell who is right on this one. I didn't want Carr because I cant stand his dad showing up at practices basically being a QB coach. Also after seeing David's work ethic I was a pass on Derek guy.
     
  8. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,151
    Rappaport reporting that Pats to extend Brady's contract in the offseason.

    They do feel he's going to be their QB for the foreseeable future (and that may only be 2 years).
     
  9. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    113,912
    Likes Received:
    175,272
    3 QBs they can swindle teams out of a first! ;)



    Here, take Jimmy G!
    [Makes Brissett the backup] Next year or year after: Here, take Jacoby B!
    Here, take this QB [we draft in the next 1-4 years]!
     
  10. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    I really don't look forward to people trying to sell us on how Brissett is going to be the savior and supporting trading first round picks for him....but I guess I just have to make my peace with it.
     
    J.R. likes this.
  11. zeeshan2

    zeeshan2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    55,455
    Likes Received:
    65,178
    Eww Brissett would be awful; is he a pocket passer?
     
  12. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Not at all.....but you know how Texans fans are, as soon as the Patriots look to move on from him Texans fans will decide he's the savior.
     
  13. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,151
    Are you this dense? Or do you honestly think Garopolo isn't capable of succeeding?
     
  14. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    I think it's highly unlikely that he'll be anything special. Certainly it's not impossible....but it's also not impossible that Jacoby Brissett could succeed.
     
  15. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    And now we see why, no matter how good or bad the Patriots think Jimmy G might be, they are not going to trade/release/whatever Brady to move on to him until he actually decides to retire. Patriots are either trading Jimmy G this year or will lose him next year to FA - they aren't franchising him or whatever other nonsense while they have a window with Brady. This thread has some truly ridiculous arguments in it.
     
  16. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,151
    Of course they're going to trade their backup when his value is high, regardless of his potential franchise ability.

    He's Tommy ****ing Brady.

    Unless he has a Montana-like situation (or even a Peyton-like situation)... where he gets injured and the team experiences a full year of what life is like without him... there's no way they're just going to trade him or let him go while he's still playing at his SB MVP-winning prime.
     
  17. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,151
    Sure... he's not the next Tom Brady.

    So have been 97% of the other QB's who have ever played this game.

    When you use THAT as a starting point for evaluation... it makes decisions to trade useless backups, that don't need to be earning huge money, that much easier.
     
  18. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    That's not the starting point though. If they thought he could be the next Matt Ryan or Derek Carr then they wouldn't trade him. Anyway, I know you are sold on him as a savior, which is fine. You'll probably be sold on many others as the savior after he ends up being nothing special for the Browns or whatever.
     
  19. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,151
    When the hell are you going to play him? He's likely better than Tom Brady was when he took the starting job... and yet the Pats will never think twice about sticking with the guy who's the greatest QB of all-time, still in his prime, and still has a tremendous opportunity to win even more.

    Also, there's a helluva lot of grey area between "savior" and "backup bum who's nothing special"... something that your black/white mentality is still struggling to sort out.

    Would you take Jimmy G if he replicated Matt Schaub's Texans career? I would in a heartbeat... especially with the capability/potential of this defense for the next 2-3 years.
     
    marks0223 and Two Sandwiches like this.
  20. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    Yes, they would - because having 2 Matt Ryans on a team is not a good use of resources.
     
    Two Sandwiches likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now