1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

My Case for Jimmy Garoppolo

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Two Sandwiches, Feb 1, 2017.

  1. Two Sandwiches

    Two Sandwiches Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    22,653
    Likes Received:
    14,282
    The NFL is all about taking metered chances in order to stay a good team. Sometimes things work out, sometimes they don't. Most teams are lucky to have a 2-3 year window to win every 10 years or so. The dominant ones can stay competitive for a decade or more. As we all know, the absolute key to being a dominant team, is a great quarterback, and this is what has kept the Texans from being one of those long-windowed teams for the past 2-4 years.

    As the team stands right now, I firmly believe that with an above average quarterback, this team has a window of 2-3 years. If it were to somehow find a great quarterback, that window expands to essentially that quarterback's career, much like the Patriots or the Steelers.

    This team took a metered chance on Brock Osweiler. It hasn't worked out. Say what you want about the contract, and giving it to a backup quarterback who didn't play much, whatever. The fact of the matter is that this team knows its window is shrinking, and because of that, made a fairly shrewd move (despite what any critic will say) to try and fix that. The contract sounds bad on paper. We've been told by countless people how bad it was. The fact of the matter is that it was quite possibly the best move Rick Smith has made as a GM.

    Now, here's what would top that.

    Offer the Patriots pick #25 and pick #57 for Jimmy Garoppolo.


    Now, a pause while you let the anger and outrage subside.


    It's not that outrageous.


    The Redskins gave the Rams #6 and #39 in the 2012 draft, #22 in the 2013 draft, and the #2 pick in the 2014 draft for RG3.

    The Rams gave the Titans #15, #43 and #45, and #76 in the 2016 draft, as well as what turned out to be #5 and and #69 in this year's draft for Jared Goff. The Rams did get some late round picks in the swap, as well, though.

    The Eagles gave the Browns #8, #77, and #100 in the 2016 draft, #12 in the 2017 draft, and a second round pick next year for Carson Wentz. They also get the Browns fourth round pick this year.

    These are the kinds of hauls that it would take for us to move up to draft Trubisky, Kizer, or possibly even Watson. From there, you don't really know what you're getting.

    With Garoppolo, you bite the bullet, give up a first and second round pick, and you have a guy that you have a good feel for, based of NFL action.

    Didn't you have a good feel for Brock? Well, you thought you did. It didn't work out. Someone should have lost their job over it, to be honest, but it's hard to fire an owner, and it looks like that decision was made by someone that can't be fired. You have to applaud the team for allowing itself to cut away it's failed experiment after two years, though. That kind of foresight is vastly underappreciated, and the narrative on the move will eventually change in time.

    Comparing the two on tape, to me, shows Garoppolo with better feet, a quicker release, better pocket mobility and awareness, better touch, better at making reads, quicker at reads, and arguably better escapability. In other words, Garoppolo looks vastly better. He looks like an NFL starter. A pro bowler, possibly.

    Some of this is possibly game planning by what may be the greatest coach in history, but clearly the guy has some talent. He has the stats to prove it -something Osweiler didn't necessarily bring to the table.

    So, you're telling me that the team should go all in on yet another backup?

    Yes.


    The Texans have drafted a first round quarterback exactly once in their history. It was a long time ago. Since then, the two times they've been in position to do the same, there hasn't really been anyone worth drafting. (Insert the guys that most of the league passed on, that went on to become good, here) History shows that this is a franchise more likely to sign someone more seasoned and hope for an immediate impact. A likely explanation of this is a mixture of bad luck, poor scouting, and an unwillingness to be bold.

    While those things may add up to a good team not having a good signal caller, they've at least added up to a good team. Now, you've got to get your good signal caller.

    The price of trading up to get one of the top quarterbacks in the draft is out of the question. It will set your franchise back. It will take away your window if it fails. More often than not, it fails.

    Instead, this franchise needs to make a bold move. The bold move is to trade for the quarterback that has been groomed by the greatest 1-2 combo in NFL history. The one who has showed promise in this league. Do what it takes to get him.

    He is only 25, about three to four years older than any rookie coming into the league. That means, if great, he still has a window of 10-12 years. That would immediately expand this team's window, if he's great, by that many years.

    You also have him under contract just for this year. It's a prove it year. With he and Osweiler coming off the books, you have the flexibility to re-sign him if he's good, or go out and try again.

    In a league of uncertainty, Garoppolo certainly is the best choice out there.

    Though the Patriots will drive up the trade market for him, and already have started to, do what you need to to get this guy. The Browns and the 49ers are going to offer rich packages for him, but you've got to beat them. Throw in another pick from next year's draft if you must.

    Use your Patriots connections to see how good this guy is. This is no Brock Osweiler situation where you sign him sight unseen. You've got a member of your coaching staff that has played with the guy. You know the staff well in New England. If everything checks out, he's your Franchise.




    (Sorry for being long-winded)
     
    #1 Two Sandwiches, Feb 1, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2017
  2. zeeshan2

    zeeshan2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    49,080
    Likes Received:
    52,886
    Or...build a time machine, go back to the '14 draft, take Jimmy G(or Carr) over Filo :p
     
    blackistan and mikol13 like this.
  3. leroy

    leroy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    26,450
    Likes Received:
    9,708
    So, you give up the ability to possibly draft a long term solution at qb and badly needed OL help for another maybe?

    I'm all for taking risks. I'm just not sure they can afford to take such another big one on another backup qb. History shows that a large majority of Super Bowl winning qbs were drafted by the team they won with.

    Lastly, if you think anyone from the NE front office or coaching staff is going to be anywhere near truthful in dealing with anyone, including former coaches, you're simply crazy.
     
    tierre_brown likes this.
  4. Two Sandwiches

    Two Sandwiches Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    22,653
    Likes Received:
    14,282
    I think Welker, now on the staff, would be more than truthful.


    Also, as I said, I don't think it's as big a risk as drafting a quarterback. First, he's been in the league, seen game action, and played well. Second, you'll get a shot at a second tier quarterback. The only one of which I think that has a decent shot at being good is Mahomes.

    Lastly, and something I forgot to mention, the areas you need help in, such as OL, can be addressed in the third round on. You can get quality depth, and some starters in those rounds. That, coupled with Martin coming back, has me not as worried about the OL.

    Garoppolo can make things happen behind that OL.


    Can Mahomes? Maybe. But he'll take a year or two, and he's still a gamble.
     
  5. Rudyc281

    Rudyc281 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    11,754
    Likes Received:
    9,438
    Bob McNair won't do it simply because he knows how it would look.
     
  6. ipaman

    ipaman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    13,046
    Likes Received:
    7,804
    why pay so much? he's gonna walk anyway in a year. pats can't and won't keep him so they'll take whatever they can get.
     
  7. jev5555

    jev5555 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    4,354
    Likes Received:
    2,015
    There are no long term QB solutions in this draft and our window is open now...not in the future whilst developing a rookie QB.
     
  8. houstonstime

    houstonstime Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2014
    Messages:
    4,280
    Likes Received:
    4,161
    Honestly, if the Pats saw anything of real value in him they would try and keep him. Brady took over for Bledsoe, he is going to leave in a couple years, why would they get rid of him, just resign him an extension.
     
    Bobbythegreat likes this.
  9. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,336
    Likes Received:
    8,752
    It's like taking a half eaten sandwich out of the trash.
     
  10. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,480
    Likes Received:
    2,074
    Don't agree with this. Brady is playing some of the best football of his career and wants to play 4 more seasons iirc. Jimmy's contract is up after next season - I guess they can sign him to a long term contract or franchise tag him to force him to stay but that doesn't make sense and would take up to much of their cap. With the extra draft picks they can draft another QB to groom and learn behind Brady. It's just a timing issue for the Pats - Jimmy is ready but Brady is not ready to retire - far far from it.
     
    T for 3 and Two Sandwiches like this.
  11. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,214
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    He has to agree to resign that extension - if you were Jimmy Garappolo, would you resign with New England as long as Tom Brady was upright, healthy and an MVP candidate?
     
    mikol13 likes this.
  12. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,214
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    We Welker was never on the same team as Garappolo. He MIGHT have Osweiler insight... but doubtful on Garappolo.
     
  13. MadMax

    MadMax Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    74,005
    Likes Received:
    20,790
    Because if you really want him, you pay what it takes to get him...we won't be the only bidder. Sounds like the Browns really want him, too.
     
  14. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    64,239
    Likes Received:
    26,990
    The best part is that when Jimmy G turns out to be nothing special, we'll be in a position to still need a QB after the Pats pick up yet another QB that is nothing special for us to overpay for!
     
  15. TheRealist137

    TheRealist137 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    33,448
    Likes Received:
    19,324
    I am weary of dealing with NE. When has hoodie ever lost a trade/transaction? This guy knows his players and knows when they are done or not that good.
     
  16. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,336
    Likes Received:
    8,752
    I guess the Texans should just run through all of the leagues back-ups until they find their man.
     
  17. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    64,239
    Likes Received:
    26,990
    Nope, just Patriots backups, it's worked out so well for teams in the past that picking up NE's scraps is the obvious thing to do at QB.
     
  18. ipaman

    ipaman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    13,046
    Likes Received:
    7,804
    yea but if he has potential for "greatness" the hoodie wouldn't let him walk. the fact he is with a 40 year old QB is telling.
     
    Bobbythegreat likes this.
  19. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    64,239
    Likes Received:
    26,990
    Exactly. If Jimmy G had the potential to be a franchise QB, they'd be getting ready to make the move to him just like Green Bay did with moving from Favre to Rodgers. The fact that they aren't doing that shows that they don't think too highly of Jimmy G.
     
    houstonstime likes this.
  20. Nick

    Nick Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    48,670
    Likes Received:
    14,833
    Exactly.

    For a fan base that is literally desperate for a quality QB... and has been selectively pissed off over the years at decisions to pass on such washouts as Vince Young, Blake Bortles, and Johnny Manziel.... I'm surprised at the sudden selectiveness when it comes to acquiring a QB that has actually played real NFL games.
     
    Red.Glare and MadMax like this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now