1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

MSNBC: US Troops Fire on Iraqi Wedding, More Than 40 Killed

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by MacBeth, May 19, 2004.

  1. Jeff

    Jeff Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    22,412
    Likes Received:
    362
    Don't start, TJ. You really don't want to go down this path. Trust me.
     
  2. nyrocket

    nyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's going to absurd lengths to defend the murder of innocents, those he has repeatedly called 'animals.' If this does not represent racism, the word has lost its meaning.
     
  3. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,373
    Unless of course he was actually calling them "animals" because of their behaviour, not their skin color.
     
  4. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,810
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    I don't remember the exact context, but you could be right. If he said that the people who carried out certain acts were animals then that's one thing.

    If he said that Palestinians were animals then that is another thing altogether and would be racist.
     
  5. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    That's how I understood it as well.

    By the way, completely unrelated, what happened to A-Train?
     
  6. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2

    Trying to tread lightly here...


    Jeff, I like you, though it seems it's not all that reciprocal anymore, but I have to disagree with this part, in content and slant.

    The assumption that I was defending ny because he and I are 'liberals' is inocorrect. First of all, I don't consider myself a liberal. Secondly, my point was about the nature of what constitutes an insult, partly for future reference. As I was trying to point out, the only real standard you can safely apply...or that is, the only one I can see...is what it factually accurate vs. what isn't. Most tradtitional insults are, by definition, innaccurate.



    To call a specific race or culture 'animals', to say they all have a desire to murder, etc. is a racist statement, in and of itself, by definition. It in and of itself would not support calling the poster racist or bigotted, but if same poster, when asked about it, affirms that stance and repeats it often and at length, it is factual to call them a racist. Racist is not, in this case, an insult it is a definition. One of the reasons why I object to the assumption that I made this argument based on political sympathy was that my previously longest and most heated debate on the same issue was with Another Brother, wherein I said his statements at the time were racist. Was I doing that because he's liberal? Or because I don't like him? Neither of those is at all true.

    If you reduce the defnition of what is insulting to what offends, with no concern for the accuracy of the comment, you are stepping off the cliff. I might find the letter Q offensive, etc. I completely acknowledge that you, in your position, have the right and sad duty to enforce A standard, and wasn't at all objecting to that, I was merely trying to find out what the defeinitive basis for THE standard is going to be. IMO, factuality should be part of it. Intent is hard to define, and as Carlin points out, choosing some words and not others is frought with difficulty. To me, in the end, you come down to what the person making the statement can demonstrate to be true. That, and not liberalism, was what I was trying to advocate.

    Another reason I object to the chracterization of my objection as political is that it goes contrary to my philosophy and experience. I think I have a pretty good record in here for not toeing party lines either way, and moreover, I have never, unlike some, tried to use means in this forum to achieve political ends beyond merely debating. For example and contrary to your assurance, before and during the early days if the war, I was insulted as much or more than almost anyone. I was called a traitor more times than I can count, a Saddam-lover, someone who rejoices in the death of Americans, a coward, and had posters literally state that they hoped I would be killed. You have on record exactly how many times I reported any of these to the mods, which would have been an obvious step were I motivated in the manner your above posts suggests. Also, contrary to your statement, if ANY of these posters were banned, let alone all of them, it's news to me.
     
  7. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    It isn't one isolated comment. And it isn't just the one, either. If you really want I can go back and find some quotes.


    There are times when I feel I could go for a beer with bama, if we didn't discuss politics. But his discussion about some peoples, Palestinians in particular, has often been extremely biggoted, and I don't use that word lightly.
     
  8. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,373
    This is how it went down. The bama post is exactly how nyrocket quoted it before his comments below. You can decide for yourself.

    SJC, A-Train lost a bet (when the Rockets made the playoffs) and had to quit posting.
     
  9. Severe Rockets Fan

    Severe Rockets Fan Takin it one stage at a time...

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    5,923
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    He made a bet that if the Rox made the playoffs(something he was SOOOO sure they wouldn't) he's stop posting for a length of time.
     
  10. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,015
    Likes Received:
    3,143
    this thread is very important. racism is a loaded topic- i don't think we really need to go there at all. where we should go is to a place where we can resolve our differences, or agree to disagree. it's insensitivity and knee-jerk oversimplifications of complicated issues that is the problem here. there is nothing to be "won" here, this a golden opportunity to discuss the upsetting state of affairs we find ourselves in. we came to this site as rockets fans, we all do have that in common and this is a start. i am new to the d&d and was dicussing with some friends how fascinating it was to "talk" politics on a basketball fan site. it represents an interesting demographic, largely male rockets' fans from all over the political spectrum. to jeff and the other mods: i would be sad to see it go. i think that if you have to ban some people, do it. i think you are providing people with a great tool for airing grievances. you guys have full discretion to call out anyone who steps out of line and i would understand if it was just too much of a pain as to be worth your time, but if rockets fans can't even be civil to one another then i think we as a nation are in some serious trouble.
     
  11. nyrocket

    nyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    0
    MacBeth is quite right. I may have responded to a particular post, but BS has been very liberal with the appellation in question. But I see very little need in digging up old quotations as BS is sure to offer a repeat performance imminently.
     
  12. Jeff

    Jeff Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    22,412
    Likes Received:
    362
    MacBeth: Just a hint...not everything is about you. What I said in my post wasn't directed only at you, although it is true that I've never seen you jump to defend TJ or bama when they are getting lectured by an admin anymore than TJ would jump in to help you. But, that wasn't my point.

    My point was to say that there is a way to debate on here and a way not to debate. Provoking others is NOT the way to do it - insults aside.

    My post wasn't just about you. It is about the tone of the D&D in general. You interjected and I responded. End of story.

    Actually, that isn't what bamaslammer said. I'm not ignoring the implication but I also understand the intention and provocational nature behind using "racist." The primary difference being that bama directed his comments towards people in general whereas nyrocket directed his comments right at bama. I'm not interested in keeping peace in the world or suppressing the underlying hostilities of any person towards another race. My interest is keeping peace on this board and one sure way to avert that is to call someone a racist. Talk about the content of the post, not the person posting.

    Again, missing the point. This is not about what word is ok and what is not. This is about finding a way to debate an issue without provoking a personal onslaught. It is not tough to do. If you find bama's reference to "animals" uncomfortable, debate the ISSUES surrounding that personification by him. Discuss why people live the way they do, why they might have been up at 3am, differences in culture, ideology, etc. Saying "you are a despicable racist" does absolutely NOTHING to further the discussion at hand. In fact, it turns well-meaning threads into free-for-all's.

    Again, not about you. I agree that in the early days of the war, the whole D&D probably should've been nuked back into the stone age, but it wasn't. During that same time, the board was trying to cope with the influx of some 15,000 new posters on the board and the D&D was WAY down on the list of priorities.

    So, now we are left to pick up the pieces and move on and since we have time, the focus is back here - note the presence recently of more moderators.

    Frankly, I don't think anyone is in here to debate or discuss. I think folks are in here to rant and shout each other down about 90 percent of the time. I'm not stupid enough to think that these topics don't invite intense discussions, but it has gotten to the point that you aren't heard unless your post is loaded with language meant to provoke others, intentionally or otherwise (note the bold face in your quoted post). And, if that doesn't change, this place is going to wear out its usefulness very quickly.
     
  13. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    Jeff, while I agree with pretty much everything you said in your last post, just a question:

    Have you never felt entertained by one of the "shouting matches", e.g., between T_J and Sam Fisher?

    I have to admit I find these threads quite entertaining myself :).
     
  14. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Jeff, how do you feel about making your post a sticky? I think that should be a last resort thing starting now and if people can't start complying, then this place should be "nuked back to the stone age".

    I'll be happy to comply.
     
  15. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Jeff-

    Lol! I wasn't implying that it was all about me, but as you said, you were in part responding to me, as you earlier pseudo-quoted me "but the minute I take aim at someone who is more liberal, the "what exactly is considered out of line on this board and why was this a problem" questions come out of the woodwork." , so I didn't feel all that ego-centric in responding.

    I don't think bama's comment in here was, in and of itself, evidence of racism. But it's an established perspective, and again, I could show a list of quotes if you like. I am often called verbose in threads where I have only uttered a few lines...

    I understand your explanation about the D&D during that period, and never really considered that aspect before ( ie the explosion of posters overall).

    I strongly disagree with the comment that no one comes here to debate. I can only really speak for myself, but I do. It's quite likely that some are according with your perspective, but certainly not all, IMO.


    Re; the provoking...I think Grizzled one noted the Canadian tendancy to try and account for all perspectives while giving theirs as an explanation for why some of my posts are longer, and I think that was the case here. I wasn't calling anyone out in particular, and if my intent there was as you describe, I was awfully vague and not terrible confrontational; to whom was I refering? I doubt anyone would claim that as their style, so I doubt anyone would feel challenged. I was merely trying to pre-empt the response that I hadn't considered that others do that.
     
  16. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,622
    Likes Received:
    6,590
    Guys, just as a point of reference, every single board I participate in has the element of two groups of people fighting with one another. I participate in a WAKEBOARDING FORUM where this occurs. The wakeboarding culture is the most laid back, happy-go-lucky group on this planet. If they can fall victim to arguing and petty fighting, then hardly anyone is exempt. It's simply human nature to come in conflict with others. It's hard to stop.
     
  17. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    But you can have petty fighting and arguing without the personal insults. We did it here for a long time.

    I'm stopping now whether people join me or not. I apologize to you T_J for all the insults I've thrown your way. That goes out to everyone else, but especially you since I've insulted you more times than anyone else.
     
  18. Faos

    Faos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    53
    I feel a group hug coming on.
     
  19. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Anyways, back to the story:


    Has anyone seen an administration response to the video, or the testimony of the AP reporters?
     
  20. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,373
    It's probably just gas.
     

Share This Page