1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Mock draft with trades

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by skenney1993, Mar 26, 2012.

  1. skenney1993

    skenney1993 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    284
    I'm not worried about missing out on a player at #33. Guys like Fleener, Randle, Jeffey, Zeitler, and now reportedly Upshaw. I agree with you about giving up a less pick next year, but a 3rd will definitely get accepted.
     
  2. desihooper

    desihooper Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2000
    Messages:
    5,459
    Likes Received:
    2,687
    I think this trade works out as follows according to the Draft Pick Trade Value Chart:

    Houston Trades: #26 (700), #58 (320), and a 2013 3rd pick (which is equal to a 2012 4th round pick - (52))

    Houston Receives: #33 (580) and #39 (510)

    Houston receives 1090 points while sending out 1072 (plus, it should be worth noting that we'll get a compensatory pick next year for losing Mario Williams in Free Agency this year).
     
  3. skenney1993

    skenney1993 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    284
    Glad to see it works.
     
  4. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,353
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Thanks for the info. Yep, getting that compensatory pick for Mario is a main reason I'd consider giving up a 2013 3rd rounder in the first place.
     
  5. skenney1993

    skenney1993 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    284
    That's why I was okay with trading it. Mario should net us a 4th round pick. A more realistic trade would be using a 4th next plus a 4th this year to move up in the 3rd.
     
  6. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    4,515
    I think our organization has gotten to the point where they don't need to zero in on one position in the early rounds. The needs are obvious to all: WR, OLB, OG, CB, ILB, TE, DT. But what will dictate our draft will not be how we rank these needs but rather how we rank the overall players on our first round draft board. Here's how I would do it (ignoring guys projected to get drafted way above us):

    1. OLB Whitney Mercilus
    2. OLB Nick Perry
    3. WR Kendall Wright
    4. TE Coby Fleener
    ------------------------(Draft down territory)
    5. OLB Shea McClellin
    6. WR Stephen Hill
    7. OLB Vinny Curry

    Then considering the position taken in the first, that sculpts how you react in the next two rounds. For OLB:

    26. OLB Nick Perry
    58. WR Marvin McNutt
    76. CB Trumaine Johnson

    For WR:

    26. WR Wright/Hill
    58. OLB Bruce Irvin
    76. NT Alameda Ta'amu
    (if you're not going to do OLB in the first then I feel you still need to address the defensive front 7 in the third round too)

    That Rams trade is ideal I think because it would allow us to choose the same position but better prospects at the second spot:

    33. OLB Vinny Curry
    39. WR Mohamed Sanu
    76. TE Dwayne Allen

    Also, you can tell that drafting an OLB in the first gives you that much more flexibility in the 3rd and later rounds to take whichever player you deem to be the best regardless of position. You are handcuffed to draft WR at 2, but this is such a deep draft for WR that I'd be happy with any of the them slated to go in that round. Someone good's bound to fall.
     
  7. sammy

    sammy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    18,949
    Likes Received:
    3,528
    Basically every mock I've seen has us drafting Wright or Randle if Wright is drafted earlier.
     
  8. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,237
    Likes Received:
    158,322
    FWIW:
     
  9. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    I'm surprised more mocks don't have the Texans going Fleener. As I said earlier in this thread, I'm fine with going WR - if there's a guy the Texans truly like and believe they can mold into an Andre replacement in time. If they're uncertain, the TE is an important enough position in the Texans offense (not to mention how interchangeable TE and WR can be, here) that a strong TE2 is more valuable than a possible upgrade on Jacoby at WR3.
     
  10. rikesh316

    rikesh316 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    36
    I think the pick is going to be Amini Silatolu. He fits the system perfectaly from what I read. If not him, I think they could pick Chandler Jones. He would provide depth on the line and could also play a little 3-4 linebacker. They should be able to get a solid WR in the 2nd round like a Mohamed Sanu, Alshon Jeffery, A.J. Jenkins, or Chris Givens.
     
  11. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    15,943
    Likes Received:
    1,626
    Been through all this already on the WR position, but still - its okay to stock up on TEs to "bolster" positions, but not on WR? Get Colby Fleener to replace your #2 TE, but not get a #2 WR you've NEVER had to BEGIN with?

    Its okay if a 7th round or undrafted free agent WR develops and "blows up" into something big. But not okay to just draft a more sure thing? Its seems pretty cut 'n dry on the WR team position. Outside the all world #1 WR, people want to HANG Jacoby Jones. And Kevin Walter is a decent "does what he does" type (who just got a pay cut, for good reason). He and the other guy did NOT "emerge" when the #1 was out.

    Then just me - If 1 guy can open up the offense so much, why not - TWO of them?

    Did the Patriots go with a "Rob Gronkowski is All We Need" approach?
    Are we mad that Ben Tate offers a great 1-2 punch with best RB in the AFC Arian Foster?

    All in all its just do the same thing at receiver - Just FORGET the Jeff Maehls altogether, is whats its about.
     
  12. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    Fleener's 40 times are right there with the WR's. He could be devastating in the play action game.
     
  13. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,237
    Likes Received:
    158,322
    .....
     
  14. HMMMHMM

    HMMMHMM Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,031
    Likes Received:
    597
    Is there a site like DraftExpress (in terms of scouting reports/mock accuracy) for the NFL?

    Also, put me in the let's get Fleener in the late 1st/early 2nd and Brian Quick in round 2 or 3 camp.

    Then again, I really don't know a whole lot about football.

    It's still fun though. Much better than reading the GARM these day. ;)
     
  15. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    36,230
    Likes Received:
    22,821
    LZ
    "League source informing me to "leave Kendall Wright out of 1st in your next mock". Not sure I'll do that, but interesting nonetheless"

    I think league sources in this one is one of lance's voices. league sources for a mock draft lol good one.

    with the performances Kendall has had in getting ready for the draft, along with his height and the fear that he might not get separation at the nfl level, I don't think it takes league sources to see how he might drop. he will still be a nice pick up in the second or third.

    I'm with those wanting fleener.
    league sources tell me fleener would even be more awesome if he grew out his hair again.
     
  16. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    36,868
    Likes Received:
    13,265
    Never liked Wright. Now some of it had to do with him playing in an offense that created a lot of open space for him, but aside from that, I still wasn't impressed with his game or his athletic abilities -- aside from his game speed (meh).

    Honest to God, if you asked me where I thought he would go and I was in a bubble, not allowed to view mocks or listen to experts, I would have said 3rd-5th round.
     
  17. david_rocket

    david_rocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,486
    Likes Received:
    831
    What about drafting Joe Adams in the 3rd round, he would take the punt/kick return job away from Jacoby Jones, and I think could be good depth in the WR.

    I dont really watch college football, but I've been watching NFL Network and they say he could be a nice pick in the 3rd rd.
     
  18. TheGoldenGreek

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    78
    I would love getting Hightower in the first round. I definitely am hoping the Texans wait till round 2 to pick up a WR.
     
  19. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    36,868
    Likes Received:
    13,265
    Me too actually, but I don't think the Texans will prioritize that position.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now