1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Mo W, Nocioni, Barnes, Pietrus for MLE?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Desert Scar, May 9, 2007.

  1. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    I also have to point out that Nocioni can only be signed-and-traded after July 15th, so you can't package him with a draft pick (as some Chicago columnists with mustaches have been suggesting).
     
  2. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    I doubt salary will be an issue for Chicago. They are in a good market and are always one of the top revenue earners in the league. So if they want Nocioni then the MLE is not a problem and the Rockets will have to be putting something rather appealing on the table for Chicago to bite.
     
  3. jdmb82

    jdmb82 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    0
    what about Yao and Alston to Indiana for Jermain O'neil, Jamal Tinsley, and Marquis Daniels?
     
  4. PeteTheCheat

    PeteTheCheat Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  5. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    Very interesting thread, Desert Scar, but no player realignment, draft pick or trade scenario can be rationally discussed without first determining who will coach the Rockets next year.
     
  6. PeteTheCheat

    PeteTheCheat Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0

    hrmmm interesting point, deserving of it's own thread I would say
     
  7. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    Good names to throw out there. I don't know much about Amir Johnson.

    I do know that the Wizards are pretty high on Andray Blatche. But they might not pay a ton for him if they are looking to lock up Stevenson.

    Blatche is the kind of "under the radar" type of athletic player I could see Morey going after.
     
  8. Rileydog

    Rileydog Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,970
    Likes Received:
    6,977
    Excellent point. Combined with the fairly rational thinking within this thread by des Scar, Deuce, etc, this further leads me to the conclusion that van gundy will be let go. His focus on rebounding, defense etc. makes it unlikely, if not impossible, for him to play a "non-traditional" PF.

    There was all the talk in the preseason about how Battier may get a look at the PF, some of the comments came from Jeff him self. but, when the ball went up, Van Gundy remained true to what he is.

    (not to derail this thread, but it's germain to the ideas expressed here -- you can't reasonably expect Van gundy to change his stripes.
     
  9. awo86

    awo86 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2006
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    0

    thats y u are a rookie....
     
  10. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11

    Well the Van Gundy move would be to go after PJ Brown with the MLE and Jason Hart with the LEE. And our defense and boarding would be even better,
    but we would still get roasted by the super athletic shooting teams.

    Now Mo Williams would be one move JVG or anyone would do.

    But the viability of small 4s with 3 range like Barnes and Nocioni, or another wing (Pietrus), yeah that could depend on the coach. Now if Mo W isn't in the picture, I'd be pretty dissappointed if we grabbed a PJ Brown over a Barnes/Nocioni just because Brown is more of a prototype of a JVG type of 4. The Rockets need athleticism and scoring punch much more than just a slightly better defensive version of Howard. If JVG hasn't see that he has tunnel vision and needs to go. If he is sincere about adding some new wrinkles with an athletic but undersized 4 with range (Barnes/Nocioni) if that was the best player available I would be OK rolling wih him. If he hadn't kept his word by mid season (reverted to a slow line-up) it would be over right then and there.
     
  11. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,296
    Likes Received:
    1,914
    JVG wants more rebounding but would he want PJ Brown? After last season JVG made comments on wanting more shooting at the 4 to create more spacing and wanting a Boris Diaw type player.
     
  12. BEXCELANT

    BEXCELANT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no way...no way that Golden State gets rid of Pietrus. He means too much to that club.
     
  13. david_rocket

    david_rocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,488
    Likes Received:
    834
    I like Nocioni, he is a very good player,
     
  14. mogrod

    mogrod Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,257
    Likes Received:
    322
    Somebody has to go on that team at the wing.

    JRich is making $11+ mill., Jackson $8 mill., Pietrus is up for an extension and they still have Monte Ellis who will need to be paid in the next year or two. And, that's not even mentioning Barnes.

    That's alot of jack for just their wing players. Then you add the money Foyle and Harrington are making, they have to cut money somewhere.

    I'm not saying Pietrus is the one to go but they have to do something IMO.

    I actually think JRich will be traded. Pietrus, Barnes & Ellis would all be cheaper no matter what and they could add another rotational piece or two to round out the team and maybe an expiring contract. He is their best trade asset.
     
  15. Rileydog

    Rileydog Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,970
    Likes Received:
    6,977

    Of the options presented, My preference would be to grab Mo williams (I rate that as possible, but less thann 50%). Our team is very good, not the classic first round fodder with zero chance of developing into a contender, that needs to be blown up (memphis). Bringing a Mo Williams is a tweak, a major tweak, but a tweak. this would allow us to see what would happen if we were to enter the playoffs with a Yao at full health, additional talent in mo Williams, and perhaps a new coach that would employ Battier at PF or take advantage of Snyder's athleticim and work him into the rotation during the year.

    I harken back to Hakeem's words to Yao, it took him 10 years. It took a while to get the right cast around Hakeem, and that coincided wth Hakeem taking his game to the legendary/complete level.

    Now that's some chicken and egg --- you have to have the right cast to give Hakeem confidence to share the ball, make the team more than the sum of its parts.

    Here, I think we need to see what Yao can become. i don't think he's done improving. If he can avoid the bs injuries, perhaps we'll see 26/10 out of him. Perhaps a new offense will round out his passing skills that we know he has. perhaps. . .

    What' I'd really like to see is the freaking triangle offense here. But wait, that's a whole nother thread that I need to consider starting.
     
  16. smileandnod

    smileandnod Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    42
    Obviously we are faced with the decision of using our limited money on either a PF or a PG. To me this decision will very much be impacted by the coaching decision. For example, if JVG leaves, I will feel much better about our PG depth cart because V-span will get to play and develop. I think Rafer (in a reduced min role) is fine to lead the team. Especially if you bring in a good defender/slasher like V-span.

    If we focus on the PF spot and get someone athletic...heck we could even get out and run a little bit when Yao isn't in the game. We will be fine in the regular season even if we stay like we are, but we are trying to build for the playoffs. As we saw with Utah, it is all about match up. The PF position KILLED us defensively in the playoffs.

    Insert one to these free agent power forwards into the line up and get V-span going, and this is a totally different team.
     
  17. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Barnes is an unrestricted free agent and Pietrus is a restricted free agent this year. I really, really, doubt they can afford to resign at MLE + type money both given the team salary and wing depth considerations Mograd mentions.

    JRich is there 2nd or 3rd best player. Yes he costs a lot, but he is more instrumental to their success. They would trade Harrington or maybe even Jackson first IMO.
     
  18. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Actually the PF position has KILLED us offensively even more. Boozer and Duncan and those guys are going to do damage to anybody. But what you want is some offensive points and efficiency and to make those guys play both ends. That is why I like Nocioni or Barnes--to get the offense more productive.

    The Rockets have much more room for improvement in offense than defense and rebounding--as nice as it would be to have a prototype athletic 4/5 type in the 4 spot it is even more important to have better/more versatile offensive player can play a lot of 4.
     
  19. Marsarinian

    Marsarinian Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,091
    Likes Received:
    282
    What we need basically lands in three positions: PG, PF, and SG/SF.

    For PG, basically there are several practical players worth consideration:
    1. Chucky Atkins
    2. Mike James
    3. Steve Francis (if he gets bought out)
    4. Draft pick: Crittenton, Acie Law (Trade UPPP)
    5. Marcus Banks (um, i dunno i dunno i dunno)
    For PF, it's hard to say, but several ideas have been quite intriguing:
    1. Travis Outlaw
    2. Marvin Ely
    3. Marc Jackson?>_<
    Basically, we take fliers on this one, because you really don't get a quality athletic big man for this price (even the full MLE)... And he's gonna have to have the defensive ability, can rebound, and score to some degree... Plus a good attitude...

    Some are interesting: Brian Cook. Uh, is Joe Smith a free agent?

    Swingmen/Wing players:
    1. Matt Barnes
    How much is this guy gonna ask for, what, 4 mil? He's got the ability and sure fills a void (scorer off the bench, creates his own shot), but how much money will he take up?
    2. Matt Carroll
    VERY Luther Head like. Hell, I bet he doesn't play the 1! And, not as bad.

    And here. Look. We basically got no chance in chasing the likes of Nocioni (hell, this guy's 77 in '07, just for the heck of it), Mikki Moore or Mo Williams. Mason, Pietrus, nope. Mike Sweetney? Nah.
     
  20. jamescar

    jamescar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    5
    I want to thank all that actually contributed to a thread with useful information. It is great to see valuable exchanges without crazy talk about Van Gundy either one way or another. If is amazing how much better the team will be with more talent and another good player.

    Thanks to all
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now