1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Mike Dickerson

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by outlaw, Jul 7, 2002.

  1. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1
    Drayton is not one of those that are losing money! I recently read in the newspaper that Drayton said he will lose money this year. That is a load of .... . There are so many ways to play with the numbers. I am in the profession. I put values on companies, projects, etc.... I know he is playing with the discount rates.
     
  2. Dennis2112

    Dennis2112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Now I am not going to back Drayton or try to explain away any issues you guys have with him but he runs the team like he runs all of his bussinesses. He does not run businesses to lose money. He does this in all of his business ventures including the Astros. I am not defending him, I personally think he could spend a little more but how much more?

    The Astros have had more success with Drayton at the helm than any other owner the Astros have ever had. We have never won a World Series but the Astros have won more games in the last 10 years than most teams that have never been to the WS all the while not let salary spending to get out of control like teams such as Balt, LA, Chi, Texas, etc.

    If MLB had at least a soft salary cap and revenue sharing, that could stop the bleeding and save the game.( Although I feel a hard salary cap like the NFL would work better)

    The scary thought for me is what kind of team could Gerry Hunsicker compile if he could spend like say ..the Yankees..;)
     
  3. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,047
    What other overbloated teams have done is trade their marketable players for 1 yr contract players and a couple of draft picks while eating up the overpaid contracts of the freeloading players (Rice, Cato, etc...)

    I doubt Les' commitment to winning will be more paramount than circumventing the luxury tax when Shaq has another 2-5 years left in the NBA.
     
  4. Pat

    Pat Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,577
    Likes Received:
    658
    RE the luxery tax.

    I have never met Les Alexander and I have no idea what his stand on the issue is. He has been a good owner as far as the dollars and cents go. He allowed management to cut and replace Maloney and others even though they had guaranteed salaries.

    I have to feel that all owners don't mind going a bit over the threshold if it will make a difference. Especially if the difference is making the play offs or not, or going deeper into the playoffs. The extra seats and tv revenue shouldl more than make up for most of the tax.

    However, I read the other day that the Knicks are $31,000,000.00 over the expected and may have to pay $31,000,000.00 in luxery tax. That has to be hard to swallow.

    If "my people" had put me in that position for those crappy results, I would want to be in on all future decisions myself.
     
  5. KALIKULI

    KALIKULI Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2000
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    16
    How about trading Mooch and MO T for Dickerson. I wonder if that works!:rolleyes:
     

Share This Page