Relevant--- <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8EtyInCF6ww" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
so she spent 50 grand of her money? or of the states money? if it was their money i think that, while it is ridiculous, it is none of our business. i am more concerned with the money spent flying her around the world in air force one. sometimes i feel like if i was a dictator for a few years i could set all of our problems straight...obviously i couldnt, but dont you just have that feeling sometimes? like if there wasn't so much bureaucratic nonsense to pile through you could get so much done for this country? but power corrupts and so that could never happen, but in my dreams sometimes i imagine becoming president taking over the country, fixing everything and then handing it back to the people....marcus aurelius would approve again, if its not my tax money, dont care all that much
none of the above. it's an entirely fabricated made up publicity stunt to promote the Agent Provocateur brand, published in a Rupert Murdoch owned British tabloid rag.
First, how is this even a question? It's not like Michelle Obama can just pull out "tax payer" money to use at will. 2nd, read the damn thread. Its not true and if it was, $50K buys enough lingerie for all the wives of every member of congress. It's clearly BS.
reading is too much work. i only read things that interest me. by "tax payer" money i was referring to any kind of stipend she may have used this under? if she is shopping with a diplomat is it covered by their budget like an expense account. not like i thought she just rolled next door to the treasury and said "wassup, mama gotta shop"
