This is your response when asked to give reasons TO vote for McCain rather than reasons NOT TO vote for Obama or Clinton? Reading is FUNdamental. Reading comprehension is apparently not taught at Rice.
andy, if you've got nothing but personal insults to share, please step aside. Did you see Jeff's post over the weekend? Applies to you too. You should not think you are above the rules.
it would be easy to respond to the sour puss posts, but I'm not because i b****ed about gwb the entire time i've been on this site. so let them have their fun
So why not root for him to be President then? This guy is gonna be such a terrible leader that I almost want him in the Oval Office. He'll be Jimmy Carter II and if the GOP can come up with a Reagan-esque nominee in 2012, they can finally right their ship. And on the subject of this thread, Michelle Obama IS a very bitter woman. I don't necessarily think Barack Obama believes the bile that Rev. Wright's been spewing for the last 20 years, but based on her public statements, his wife sounds like she's bought it hook, line, and sinker.
I hope you are not referring to Jeff with that, because he is the one who laid out the new rules of the road. Hopefully you can man up and follow them.
Who did I quote? Hint: It was't Jeff. And the "new rules of the road" aren't very prominent since there is no post started by Jeff on the first 5 pages of the D&D. They also don't seem to have stopped your insults in the least, based on your postings over the past few days, at least the ones I've seen.
I believe he is referring to when he got PWNED here http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=147886&page=1&pp=20
Wow, I missed that one. I haven't seen a PWNing like that in a long time. t_j, I hope you took what he said to heart.
moon, you jump into a thread in which no personal insults had been exchanged and immediately start dropping personal insults. Then you have the small-dacity to accuse me of hurling insults? This is case in point why your.... cred ... is in question here.. it's just a hypocritical move on your part. I'd say in the last couple of years, the only things you've brought to the board have been a pro-legalization information dump and a litany of personal insults against me. Neither have worked.
You truly make me laugh. Your insults have been so widespread and constant that Jeff wrote a post TO YOU DIRECTLY calling you out for it. I will not ask for forgiveness for pointing out that you regularly toss out insults seemingly without any sanction, particularly when the moderator of this forum directly chastised you for it less than a week ago. If you have honestly changed and have forever put your insulting ways in the past, I am glad. It can only help to improve the discourse in this forum. I won't be holding my breath. As far as your diatribe about what I have "brought to the board," you need to go back and re-read my posts with an eye for comprehension. In between my comments about your ability to comprehend the written word (my biggest problem with you) and discussions of the efficacy of prohibition (a topic on which, I may point out, you have had exactly zero substantive responses) have been plenty of other substance-based discussions on a wide variety of topics. I don't know what you mean by "worked," but my comments about you have all been 100% accurate and my discussions about the drug war have proven, to me at least, that there are many highly intelligent posters on both sides of the R--D divide who agree with me, some of whom were 100% for the drug war when I started these discussions here. Now, go away or I shall taunt you a second time-a. <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9V7zbWNznbs&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9V7zbWNznbs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
