How about you just admit that you have no idea what you are talking about? You have said nothing and proved nothing. MJ didn't establish anything at an early age. It was his father and Motown. It is you that doesn't have a leg to stand. You are too busy doing the moonwalk to really understand a gloved dancer vs a musical genius.
Purely Muscially? I would say Prince. The total package? Michael by a mile. He had the "it" factor (seamless integration of dance and music, and sheer stage presence) to lift his star power across race, gender, and nations. It was funny he was known as the King of Dance-Pop in East and Southeast Asia (China, Japan and Korean, Thailand, Indonesia, etc.). But then most of world population barely know English.
