1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by langal, Dec 19, 2005.

Tags:
Page 3 of 3
  1. gwayneco

    gwayneco Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2000
    Messages:
    3,459
    Likes Received:
    36
    Mary Mapes and Dan Rather.
     
    #41 gwayneco, Dec 22, 2005
  2. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    Would like to know if this study was sponsored by any special interest group. Yeah yeah, I know UCLA is supposed to be a "liberal" school.

    I find the methodology cited in the article questionable.

    EDIT: Mulder's post confirms my suspicion.

    Some perspectives: while vast right wing conservatives call it Clinton News Network, in the eyes of many overseas Chinese, CNN is equivalent to "China No good News."
     
    #42 wnes, Jan 12, 2006
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2006
  3. Dreamshake

    Dreamshake Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 1999
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    1

    If it is so dangerous do you also point out the danger of watching anything on Faux News, Reading Newsmax, or the Washington Times. Or do you lecture your kids on the horrors of Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Hannity? Unlesss you want to propostersly claim none of these are "biased".


    If not then you are being a hypocrite. Instead your sentence post should read more like this.



    Liberal Media Bias is dangerous to MY way of thinking. It contradicts everything that I WANT to be percieved as the truth....It is a danger to the Republican Party...especially to the Young republicans clubs. This is one of the reasons I point out the bias in the NY TIMES, but NOT in Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, or Fox news.
     
    #43 Dreamshake, Jan 12, 2006
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2006
  4. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    The Klan has a slightly higher body count, and no Image Awards, so maybe not. Federalist Society, Christian Coalition, Concerned Alumni of Princeton, NRA (given their size and level of influence) maybe.
     
    #44 Dairy Ashford, Jan 15, 2006
  5. richirich

    richirich Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    1
    Richirich announces his study finds 99.99% of the world is self-biased and self-interested but not very interesting.... :eek:
     
    #45 richirich, Jan 16, 2006
  6. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,910
    Likes Received:
    13,042
    People in the academic world (do I just say "academics"?) are often paid by special interest groups to come up with their "findings". And I'm sure that goes for both the Dems and the Repugs.

    So it's tough to lend credence to this sort of stuff.

    And thacabbage is right: a lot of scummy goings-on never make it to print thanks to editors either conservative or scared-straight (so to speak: print that story and we'll ruin you).
     
    #46 ROXTXIA, Jan 16, 2006
  7. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    Shouldn't that force people to find another outlet or demand better accountability from our journalists?
     
    #47 Invisible Fan, Jan 16, 2006
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page