1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Marc Stein is an IDIOT

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Val, Jan 23, 2006.

  1. London'sBurning

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,205
    Likes Received:
    4,817
    Houstonians nukka. Fat face Stein.
     
  2. pacertom

    pacertom Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    405
    Personally I think scoring 63 in playoff game against a championship caliber team committed to stopping you and doing everything possible to win is far more impressive.

    When MJ dropped 63 on the Celtics, that was more impressive than 81 in a meaningless game against the lowly Raptors, or even a sideshow meaningless game in which Wilt scoreed 100.

    What was Wilt's playoff high?
     
  3. Drexlerfan22

    Drexlerfan22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2002
    Messages:
    6,362
    Likes Received:
    520
    Ummmm... no.

    Actually, as it got towards the end of the game and they realized what he was up to, they desperately tried everything they could to stop him... their best idea was to foul him, but it didn't work...

    What, because they were against the rules? Please. You know what else? What Shaq does on every offensive play is against the rules. Is it called? No. Wilt was constantly double-teamed. Not legal, but not called. Oh, and that precious star treatment of today? It was the opposite for Wilt... refs let guys get away murder on Wilt to equalize the game.
     
  4. London'sBurning

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,205
    Likes Received:
    4,817
    Wilt I believe throughout his entire career was a pretty bad FT shooter. It just happened to be one of those nights where Wilt wasn't missing much from the FT line. I think the stat line was he was 28-32, but throughout his career I think he hovered around 50% FT shooter. I think he was the first example of the Hack-a-Shaq technique and considering Wilt was before Shaq's time, you might call it Hack-a-Wilt. Were Wilt a better career FT shooter, you might even see a bigger scale of dominance between himself and the rest of his competition. He wasn't just a scoring machine though. He routinely lead the league in rebounds as well, and I believe lead the league in assists just because people said he was selfish. That's true dominance, and Kobe's performance isn't anywhere close to the feats Wilt has achieved.
     
  5. Kyrodis

    Kyrodis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    22
    Exactly...for someone of Wilt's size, he had a huge amount of versatility. He holds the only "Triple 20" in basketball history. He had something along the lines of 25 points, 25 rebounds and 20 assists in one game...although I can't remember the exact numbers. I'm sure you can google it.

    If they had recorded blocks/steals back then, I'm almost certain he would've had a few quadruple doubles. Hell, he may have even had a quintuple double at some point.
     
  6. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    Is he factoring in the rules changes that allow guards to get to the basket easier? And the zone defenses that can take away the inside game?
     
  7. apostolic3

    apostolic3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,624
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wilt's 100 point game was incredible, but I'm sorry, you MUST consider his physical dominance. In 1962, the NBA was a different league. Even with all this considered, his 50 ppg average one year was insane.

    Kobe's 81 point game was more difficult than Wilt's 100 point game. Again, the NBA was a different league 43 years ago and it's hard for us to realize how physically dominant Wilt was back then. He was way ahead of his time. Reading NBA.com's description of the game, the Knicks purposely fouled Wilt's teammates to prevent him from scoring, but the Warriors responded by fouling back to get the ball back. Wilt's game was less of a real game and more of a side show than Kobe's.

    To someone else, Kareem didn't enter the NBA until 1969. Wilt was drafted in 1959. Yes, the NBA's athleticism improved dramatically between those years.
     
  8. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    Ummm...One thing people seem to be forgetting is that Wilt had 25 rebounds in that 100 point game, and he had as many assists as Kobe despite putting up 15 more shots
     
  9. arno_ed

    arno_ed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    8,026
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    The thing i do not understand is saying that Wilt had it easier. You have to look at the time. in Wilt's time people might had lesser equipment and time to train, but the same goes for Wilt himself. You cannot compaire people in different times with each other, you have to compaire them with the people in his time and look at how much he dominated. And Wilt has dominated his time much more then Kobe has(because kobe doens't dominate hit time).

    he was a monster, we have never seen anyone be so dominant (over the people in his time) as he. Ofcourse kobe's night was great, but i will not see him as someone better then Wilt. Like so many people said the numbers Wilt averaged each year were unbelievable.
     
  10. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    Is that a reflection on Wilt's abilities or the way the game was played back then....look at the score for crying out loud...we wouldnt reach those levels unless 2 high scoring NBA teams played in a 5 OT game.
     

Share This Page