Marbury?

You, sir, are a genius.

 

I'd take marbary over rafer any day. Yes, he is kind of crazy, yes, he is a good player. He can play the PG position well. Rafer just plays as a moderate level....We need more than that.

 

Screw you.

 

ehh, then you get a too many cooks in the kitchen complex. no coach is that good to weave all that talent together whilst still giving the young talent playing time and scouting the opposing teams.

 

I will give u one chance to take this back before u get rail roaded by this asinine statement...........

lol.....come on man stop the jokes......its to late in the night for this....will u be performing all week??????

or

STARBURY IS THAT U MAN!!!!!!!!!

I KNEW PLAYER TROLL AND LURK OUR BOARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Marbury. No way. We don't need him.

 

UPDATES: The Dorsey signing that was suppose to be finalized today has been postponed due to the Carl Landry offer sheet, but should be finalized in the next few days. He has options from a 1 year all the up to 4 year contract.

The Knicks trade proposal was to send Stephon Marbury to the Rockets in exchange for Steve Franics. This traded wouldn't hurt us in the age factor, because they're only one day apart in age. It might have ever allow the Rockets to have a second string scoring force, but at the same time disrupt chemistry at the guard position.

In other news, the Rockets Media Day is this Monday and should have an excellent turn out. For up to date Rockets news login to Houston Rockets Applcation on facebook every week on Friday around 6 PM!!!

 

Stephon Marbury??good choose,but rockets no money for him!!

 

I am tired of people thinking too much of chemistry this and chemistry that.....the bottomline is talents!! Talents lead to win!! and Marbuy is a hell of a talent compare to Rafer...especially on the shooting %.

 

Wow, you are so hostile. haha, I agree with your statement though. I wouldn't phrase it exactly like that though.

 

signed,

Shaq, Kobe, the Mailman, and the Glove

 

What teams have marbury's "talent" led to winning?

 

I got that from Adam from facebook.

i don't know how credible he is..but it seems like he works for the organization.

 

I don't care about him being cancer.
The thing I care about is him being "me, then me, then some more of me and then - when everybody thought it's gonna be me again - I go and make a wow pass" type of point guard. This is the ugliest part of basketball for me to watch.
I rather have Alston bricking than team falling apart because of "10 assist, 20 dimes" point guard.

 

..and this should also count for Tinsley thread.

 

Just say no to Tinsley and Starbury please... PLEASE... I would rather have Brooks logging 35 minutes a game than have those *@#$#@%s hogging the game and blowing us apart. Heck, I'd even have Steve instead of these guys, and everybody knows how low I expect of Francis.

 

I also like Brooks....and hope he has his confidence back...

DD

 

I would just rather go with brooks anyway. The spurs did it and won, rondo was up and down all season and in the playoffs, yet we continue to watch a sub 40% shooting rafer.