Didn't girls used to get married off when they were really young in the olden days? Like 12 or 14? I'm just trying to lessen the guilt. I'm 21, so I don't consider myself too far off from Lindsay. I'm the college guy she dreams about when she gets tired of immature high school boys
i think moe said it better "If there's grass on the infield... play ball." grass grows early in the season...you don't want to play ball while grass is still growing
Hell guys, one of the Olsen twins is dating a 20 year old who plays football for an Ivy League school.
if I had one, I sure as hell wouldn't come to this thread it would be too awkward but thats not gonna happen for atleast 24 years
Well put, except I was 17 six years ago. Part of my amazement over her looks is that if I didn't know better, I'd think she was around 20-21-22 years old.
I agree. I also don't see the fascination with Anna Kornikova or Britney Spears either. They're all certainly beautiful, but they get entirely too much attention. I wouldn't put any of those women on my top ten list.
Well this kind of brings about the basic conundrum of our "biological nature versus societal mores". As animals, our #1 most basic impulse it to survive and reproduce. So we are driven biologically (generally speaking) to make babies. Over millions of years, we have evolved to be ready for childbearing at around the ages of eleven to thirteen or so. During puberty and after we are compelled to have sex. Now in ancient times, humans needed to give birth pretty early due to life expectancy and child mortality. So we had to start pumping out babies and having sex right when we had the ability. But in the past few millennia (a tiny fraction of human history in the grand scheme of thing), human population has exploded. Due to health advances, we are living longer and infant mortality has plummeted. So perpetuating the species is no longer a concern. In fact we are now starting to face the issue of overcrowding. The problem in terms of adolescent sexuality is the fact that societal attitudes have changed over the years to reflect a very puritanical spirit. Also, since humans don't need to start pumping out babies at a young age, then the original reason for teen sex has diminished. Societal mores have changed since antiquity, but EVOLUTION HAS CHANGED AT A MUCH SLOWER RATE. Our bodies are still conditioned to want to have sex from puberty on. The fact that such acts are usually frowned upon at those ages in our society, doesn't change our hormones and biological impulses. So there you have it. Society says, "Don't have underaged sex!" but our bodies say, "But it's not underaged. I need to make babies. And if making babies means having sex, then I'm just going to have to live with that. BTW do you have any condoms." And that my friend is the problem.
Let's try this again.. the last three that I tried to post.. plus more: 3 4 5 From another show: 1 2 3 4 And from E! News.. apparently Vanity Fair.. 1 2 3
Thanks to all for the pictures except the dang Antonio Banderas. That's some awesome bra technology but she definitely knows how to play up her assets. Was Jimmy looking at her eyes or what?
I still don't think she's all that, but here's a lil sumthing sumthing for you guys obsession over her. IMO its AB>OT>LL sorry, but thats a 17 yr olds view. http://lindsaylohan.cc/ the whole snl show is on there, so enjoy.... o yea, ann, happy birthday, i turn 18 almost a month later.....cant wait.
No thread full of bbs perverts gawking at under-aged girls would be complete without a few pics of cf.net hottie Alizee. More where that came from
Would ya look at the size of that kid's head! It's the size of a planetoid and it has it's own weather system!
