I was 17 7 years ago and the 17 year old girls back then didn't even dress like the 17 year old girls now. Hell they didn't even dress like the 14 and 15 year olds now.
Being a teenage girl, this is pretty freaky.. to be around so many males on this board and reading what men of all ages discuss/think about.. esp of underage girls
hahaha... that's what i'm saying. meanwhile... i can't believe such a young girl would go and get fake breasts.
She's only underage in certain states, according to my trusty map (that I received in a FHM magazine a few years ago) South Carolina and Hawaii have the limit at 14 while several states have the limit at 16. Ms. Lohan is 17 going on 18 and 18 is fully legal.
As you can see by this behemoth of a thread, they have certainly boosted her popularity. I don't know if they are or aren't fake though.
You will now here the shound of several grown men being very, very quiet... But, seriously, if this is appropriate ( to address you as an ambassador for your demographic) Do you have any sympathy for our confusion? Teen girls today, at least the ones we're discussing, like Spears, Lohan, etc. dress to provoke, no? Knowingly emphasize aspects of their physique which have an exclusively sexual connotation, and dress in a way completely in keeping with that of girls 5 or so years older. So for what do you hold us responsible? For mistaking girls of 17 with girls of 22, or for finding aspects of the female physical form attractive in a way consistent with our history as a species? Do you think that, if there is a wrong here, the girls themselves bear any responsibility? Besides, in an aside, from dealing with students, from what I have seen there is a sexual aggression which accompanies the sexual appearance of many of these girls which transcends our age barriers. I do look quite young, but still, many who think I'm 24 or 25 still flirt/come on, and these can even be kids in their teens. SO I don't think it's all that endemic to be shocked by the reaction of older men...
they've gotta be. and if they're not... then well... that's just amazing. hey uh... when the girls of the apprentice come out, you mind scanning in the pics and sending them to me? haha... my girlfriend actually loved that show... so i guess maybe she won't mind?
While there, I will look up "action" and " thought" and see if I can find a distinction. You are assuming I was advocating acting on the attraction!?!? I thought you would have known me a little better than that.
Well, if these girls wouldn't try so hard to look older then grown men would look at them in a normal way. It is like JAG (Macbeth) said (essentially) - how are we suppose to know that she really isn't that old when she is pulling out all the stops (dressing provocatively?). BTW - I was looking over some pics of her on the imdb site and she definitely "blossomed" in 2004. There is a pic of her in 2002 and she looks, guess what, like any normal 15 year old girl. But when she turned 17 (hell, maybe even 16), there was a definite growth spurt, if you know what I mean.
i'm totally kidding! i should have put a smilie behind it...so i will now i've already made my thoughts on ms. lohan quite clear!
