1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Lieberman: U.S. should consider military strike against Iran

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by ROXRAN, Jun 10, 2007.

Tags:
Page 6 of 8
  1. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    Sure, when are you going to stop being one?
    :rolleyes:
     
    #101 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  2. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    How would it not be possible? explain...
     
    #102 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  3. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    shut up and take my word for it...you are good at that when something is posted without cross reference support, evidence, or the names of consequence...



    It's bunk because it contains nothing but the absence of
    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity.


    No, if you paid attention my entire argument regarding the article is due to the complete and utter lacking of :
    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity.

    I mentioned once I believe about the respondent making more sense because he cited facts (such as there is no names of supposed "U.S. officials", or verifiable evidence)...It is you who seems to cling on to the respondent...Perhaps that is the only thing you can considering THERE IS NOTHING in the article which is...worth...clinging...on...to...
     
    #103 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  4. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    U.S. officials often are named...In the original article I posted, U.S. officials are named...which can be verified for cross reference support, and specific meaningful evidence (unlike your weightless article)

    I would argue that a terrorism expert with French connections is not a name of consequence since he does not exude any kind of direct or even indirect U.S. government relation...


    Again, you need to learn your A, B, C...

    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity


    I asked you to: first off name the official (with the hope you had SOME kind of cross referenced, verifiable article)...and you don't answer the question...Instead you give me "trained parrot" response...(which doesn't answer my question)

    So I guess you are a "trained parrot",...fancy that!

    I'm facinated that "everyone" understands this,...but please explain the rationale,...O I see you have! Let's get right to it!


    Come on jo momma ...think (for once)
    I think it's already established you are not the example of spelling and grammar...Of course, neither am I, but I do know as well as you should that you answer a clear and concise question with an answer... that should be clear and concise as well...

    You failed on this miserably,...So when you do produce a name at the bequest of the question, I simply expected you missed that comma intentionally or unintentionally to make it seem as if you answered the question...

    The truth of the matter is the truth is you have an article which fails:...

    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity.

    Considering this, how can your article NOT be bunk?...


    ...Shut up and listen. pay attention to the question. I am again asking clearly and concisely...

    Can you produce an article to verify your claims which it's information is based on:
    A. cross reference support?
    B. specific meaningful evidence?
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity?

    Do this, then..."I'm ready to admit"...

    till then it's fully entertaining engaging with a "trained parrot" Quick... what color is the sky? lol...
     
    #104 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2007
  5. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    wrong again!

    why is it that everyone understands this but you?
     
    #105 jo mama, Jun 18, 2007
  6. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    you have to have someone explain to you that one would not be able to be both a senior u.s. government official and an abc news correspondent?

    just when i thought you couldnt be anymore clueless you step up and hit another one out of the park!

    enjoy "yourselve" with that! :)
     
    #106 jo mama, Jun 18, 2007
  7. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    Good morning! Why is it that everyone knows that you answer a question with an answer but you?
     
    #107 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  8. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    why the double standard dude? why do you not demand of "yourselve" what you demand of others?

    again, you have done nothing to debunk anything in the article and the person whom you have quoted (whom you still have not named from "cross reference support") did nothing to contradict anything in the article. you offered no "specific meaningful evidence" to back up anything they said or gave any "cited names of consequence". even if you did, nothing the person said contradicted anything in the article.

    the quote you posted from the "respondent" made no mention of what you are claiming and did nothing to debunk anything in the article. but again, if you want to take the word of an anonymous person who posts in the comments section of the article, without providing their name or any links/sources to back up what they are saying and totally dismiss a mainstream news article then more power to you. enjoy "yourselve" with that!

    dont you mean "there ARE no names of..." for someone who likes to chide others for spelling errors you sure make alot of them. enjoy "yourselve" with that!

    it is what it is - an abc news article in which government sources disclose that our government is aiding the jundallah, a terrorist group. just because you say it is "bunk" doesnt make it so.
     
    #108 jo mama, Jun 18, 2007
  9. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487

    I'm ron burgundy?

    [​IMG]
     
    #109 DonkeyMagic, Jun 18, 2007
  10. BEXCELANT

    BEXCELANT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's just a matter of time. We are already fighting this war globally in Somalia, Afghanistan, Indonesia, and however many other 'stans' there are. Just last week a US destroyer shelled Al Qaeda positions in support of Christian Ethiopian troops in Somalia. This is a continuation of a 700 year old war between Christians and Muslims. Only thing is nobody in our gov't is saying so for fear of upsetting the Muslims.

    Fact:

    1.2 Billion Muslims
    2.6 Billiion Catholics and Christians.
     
    #110 BEXCELANT, Jun 18, 2007
  11. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    if you want to dismiss someone w/ all his credentials but take the word of an anonymous person who posted in the comments section (who didnt even contradict anything in the article in the first place) than more power to you. enjoy "yourselve" with that!

    dont you mean "fascinated"? :p

    you have completely and totally lost it and im enjoying every step of the way! keep digging that hole! when did you drop out of school - 3rd grade? 4th grade? there is no way you made it to middle school.
     
    #111 jo mama, Jun 18, 2007
  12. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    I do...I do...For example, I posted in another thread today in D&D besides this one...and guess what?

    I posted an article which has:

    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity.

    WOW...

    The "article" debunks itsself when it lacks:

    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity.
     
    #112 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  13. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    LOL!, I tell you what I enjoy is how you stand by an article which lacks:
    A. cross reference support.
    B. specific meaningful evidence.
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity

    ...Furthermore, how did you develop the art of answering a question without giving an answer?
     
    #113 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  14. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    I would have thought there were more Muslims, for some reason...
     
    #114 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  15. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    i answered your question a few pages ago. i listed everyone mentioned in the article. as i and others have pointed out, often government officials are not allowed to be named directly. i know you must feel really foolish knowing that you have the grammar and sentence structure abilities of an 8 year old, but you really need to move on - this isnt healthy.

    are you ready to admit that iran is not the only country supporting hezbollah, as you falsely claimed?

    are you ready to admit that none of the 19 hijackers were iranian (again, you should have known this already - im very surprised that someone who wants to "kill" iranians had to be told that none of the hijackers were iranian).

    are you ready to admit that saudis are supporting the insurgency which is killing americans?

    are you ready to admit that our government orchestrated the overthrow of irans democratically elected leader in order to set up a brutal dictator who killed thousands?
     
    #115 jo mama, Jun 18, 2007
  16. rimbaud

    rimbaud Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 1999
    Messages:
    8,169
    Likes Received:
    676
    Seriously? It is called conflict of interest (not to mention time). One cannot be a senior government official, with access to all sorts of information and influence, and be under the employ of a network news agency...not to mention also being part of a private university.

    You are really on a strange crusade here, ROXRAN. Nobody is reading it the way you are (of those who have chimed in, of course) but keep fighting the good fight. I do not belong here anyway, though, because I am an idiot so I will allow the big boys to continue playing without me. Sorry to waste everyone's time.
     
    #116 rimbaud, Jun 18, 2007
  17. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    Yes, I knew that...I simply wanted an exhibition of how you answer a clear and concise question with an actual answer for jo momma...

    I appreciate your usage...
     
    #117 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  18. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    No you did not. Once again I asked: first off name the official? Now an answer can be given as you stated, but it did not answer the question...

    Can you produce an article to verify your claims which it's information is based on:
    A. cross reference support?
    B. specific meaningful evidence?
    C. cited names of consequence for accountability and validity?

    Do this, then..."I'm ready to admit"...
     
    #118 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
  19. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    rox...just admit it dude. :D
     
    #119 DonkeyMagic, Jun 18, 2007
  20. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,814
    Likes Received:
    5,219
    I know...
     
    #120 ROXRAN, Jun 18, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 6 of 8

Share This Page

Style
ClutchFans Dark

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Rockets Content

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now