1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Lieberman: "There is no humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip"

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Mathloom, May 30, 2010.

  1. MiddleMan

    MiddleMan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    267
    Yes, since Israel inspected and allowed certain items of the aid now Hamas are refusing to accept it?? Another Fail.
     
  2. LScolaDominates

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    81
    I'm pretty sure the flotilla activists were aware of, likely even expected, the contingency in which they would be boarded by the IDF. In fact, I know they were. Surely the fact that they didn't arrive on the Gaza shore unmolested doesn't mean they failed to challenge the blockade. The international calls for Israel to lift it also seem to suggest otherwise.

    So you're saying that the activists thought they could overpower the IDF in open seas?
     
  3. MiddleMan

    MiddleMan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    267
    ^^^ So why not cooperate with the IDF?? Like the other ships, that would of saved 9 lives.
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,143
    Likes Received:
    43,442
    Otto;

    I totally agree with you on this. I completely understand this was a publicity stunt by the organizers an they expected a confrontation. That said it was stupid for Israel to cater to it. As I have said before there was a simple solution to this. Just allow the ships to proceed to Gaza and have a big press conference while the ships are unloading. If Israel is tacitly all sorts of aid in through tunnels are otherwise they lose nothing by allowing these ships to unload. In fact it makes Israel look like the good guys. Further if these ships are carrying weapons for Hamas the world will see that if they have to publically unload.
     
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,143
    Likes Received:
    43,442
    I agree with you here. Stupid stupid stupid.

    As much as it would help the people of Gaza to not have Israel around it might help them just as much, maybe even more so, to not have Hamas.
     
  6. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,143
    Likes Received:
    43,442
    I notice you and Hypedplayer are throwing around a lot of legalities but let me ask you this question. If your ship is forcibly boarded in internation waters do you have the right to defend yourself?
     
  7. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    18,344
    Likes Received:
    13,717
    Google "Karine A".

    This is a logistics issue. Bringing in a hundred tons of weapons on a ship is a whole lot easier than dragging it through a tunnel one box at a time. Especially when there are other people willing to pay more to have their luxury goods hauled. Logistically, they couldn't have carried the Karine A's cargo through the tunnels in any reasonable period of time, even without competition for the throughput of the tunnels. The only way to do so would be to build a massive, four lane highway paved tunnel. And if Hamas tried that, the Israelis would bomb it before it could be used.

    This is similar to the reason that the US Army's tons and tons of junk in Iraq was sent by sea even though it took orders of magnitude longer for it to get there. Only the stuff that was needed for the front end of the invasion went by plane. The other 99% was send by sea. With airplanes you simply can't match the throughput of cargo ships.

    Your view only makes sense if they didn't really believe the blockade was a security measure for Israel - basically it only makes sense if they were enforcing the blockade just to screw with the Palestinians. If they genuinely believe that it is necessary to inspect ships to maintain security, then there is a whole lot to lose. Specifically, security and lives.

    Basically you are saying the appropriate way to handle it would be to end the blockade. But they really believed that doing so was safe, they never would have instituted it in the first place.

    When you are dead, it is small consolation if someone thinks you are a good guy for a couple of seconds in passing while reading the morning paper.
     
    #347 Ottomaton, Jun 4, 2010
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2010
  8. Hydhypedplaya

    Hydhypedplaya Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    89
    Hamas has actually cut down the rocket attacks. The sporadic attacks that happen now are caused by lesser known groups like:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Resistance_Committees
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Front_for_the_Liberation_of_Palestine
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_Islamic_Jihad
     
  9. madmonkey37

    madmonkey37 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    52
    They do have the right to defend themselves, but things aren't black and white. Even though they have the right to defend themselves, it doesn't mean that they should. All those ships that get boarded by pirates in the Gulf of Aden had the right to defend themselves, but they rarely put up resistance. This is because fighting back would pretty much insure their deaths.

    From the start Israel said that there was no way that those ships were going to make it to Gaza. Those activist on the Mavi Marmara knew that they were going to be boarded, especially after watching the 5 other ships get boarded and seized. At this point the activist have few options left, they can either fight against a better armed and trained force or they could surrender\put up passive resistance. By choosing to fight they gave the Israelis justification to defend themselves.

    If you look at the big picture and take everything into account, which is pretty hard to do since Israel is releasing bits and pieces of video evidence and also because of the conflicting agendas, you can see that this whole flotilla situation was going to go t*** up from the start. The fact that the flotilla was organized by a dubious organization (the IHH), the comments made by the organizers about the flotillas goal being to break the blockade instead of delivering supplies, several hundred Muslims in close proximity to a small team of hostile Israelis and Israel backing itself into a corner by announcing that the flotilla was not going to make it to Gaza; all this gives is a recipe for a bad ending. The Israelis should have been better prepared.

    The blame for this whole incident ultimately lies with Israelis as they were responsible for everyones lives since they were the ones with all the guns and had the ability to achieve a better end to this incident.
     
  10. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
  11. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,535
    Likes Received:
    18,737
    TO clarify something here... If I'm not mistaken, UN does not declare a state. It acknowledges its formation.

    For Israel, they declared themselves a state. To formally become a state it needs to be recognized by some of the 5+1 countries. In Israel's case, they declared themselves a state and got recognized by some of the 5+1 countries almost within 1 hour, and then the UN accepted them as a state.

    For obvious reasons, those same countries have never accepted Palestinian statehood.

    Also, the Arabs did not try to collectively kill of Israelis. That is a misleading statement. They wanted to own the entire land area and drive the Israelis out in all-out war.

    The stronger group, btw, was Palestine. Had America (and Russia for Arabs) not interefered, the Arabs would have succesfully taken the land.

    But that's besides the point. Palestine belonged to the Brits after the Ottomans. The Brits approved the formation of a Jewish state in the heart of this territory (not one half, not in the corner, but in the heart). It was essentially impossible for Palestinians to accept that they are the majority, are the current governors of the land, and that now Israel will form a state in the center of that land.

    Had Arabs been successful in kicking them out so soon after the tragic events of the holocaust, the Jews in Palestine would have been homeless. However, it makes me wonder why the Arabs did not try to kick them out for 1,000 years when they were very easily able to do so.

    In all cases, both the Jews and Arabs got greedy and did not want to negotiate. Though Britain's strategy was filled with douche, they should not have taken it out on each other. The Arabs and Jews should have recognized that Britain, US, and Russia were pitting them against each other like puppets and monkeys, and with absolutely no interest in any of there well beings (as evidenced by those countries' weak and almost non-existant attempts to interfere with the holocaust).
     
  12. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,535
    Likes Received:
    18,737
    It's a balance thing. Israeli extremists will destroy Palestine without Hamas. Hamas will destroy Israel without the extremists.

    That's the sad thing for me. The extremists on both sides are feeding off each other's interests.

    They create a physical, mental and moral barriers between the people of both sides. Out of sight, out of mind. That gives extremists the freedom to create a monster and request permission to kill a monster.

    Anyways, long story. Hope the extremists kill each other off, but seems the civilians are always the victims of their actions.
     
  13. AroundTheWorld

    AroundTheWorld Insufferable 98er
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    70,010
    Likes Received:
    47,706
    Nonsense.
     
  14. Hydhypedplaya

    Hydhypedplaya Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    89
    Nonsense.
     
  15. FranchiseBlade

    FranchiseBlade Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    49,277
    Likes Received:
    17,881
    So your tactic is to give in to bullying and oppression?

    It might not get people killed you're right.

    But to carry your tactic out world wide doesn't seem productive.

    Sure if people in Iraq under Saddam had never stood up and fought against Saddam's rule and his sons' brutality then all the people killed in retaliation wouldn't have been killed. But it hardly seems right to blame those that fought against it.
     
  16. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,535
    Likes Received:
    18,737
    It's not about confronting bullies for no reason IMO.

    The blockade kills 9 extra people per year quite easily. So to say it's not worth losing 9 is idiotic, because the whole point is that Israeli imposed blockade is not a reasonable way of achieving their goals - it is strangling millions of people and forcing them to be governed by Hamas.

    This isn't directed at you, it's directed at the post you quoted. To say that "it's not worth losing 9 lives" is just senseless. It's not even worth ONE, nevermind 9. But when there are 1.5 million people suffering and the blockade is contributing to hundreds, if not thousands, of additional deaths then you have to take the risk and make a move like this and hope no one dies.

    It's like saying to woman "don't struggle if u get raped, there will be fewer bruises and pain."

    The blockade is unjust. Resistance is logical.
     
  17. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,535
    Likes Received:
    18,737
    You're right. My bad. Those settlers are peacemakers.
     
  18. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,143
    Likes Received:
    43,442
    Except you missed the part about having the ships unload publically with the media there. If the ships really are smuggling weapons then they will be exposed.
     
  19. MiddleMan

    MiddleMan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    267
    I would like to see another country intervene with Israel blockade with success.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127469706

    Israel Vows To Stop New Aid Ship Heading To Gaza

    An aid ship trying to break the blockade of Gaza could reach Israel's 20-mile exclusion zone by Friday afternoon, an activist said, but Israel's prime minister has vowed the ship will not reach land.
     
    #359 MiddleMan, Jun 4, 2010
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2010
  20. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now