Just to clarify and put this line of thought to rest, here is part of what I just posted in another thread: (The problem with our debate has been that) I have been arguing fixed wholes as opposed to fluid wholes. You can't win more games than you play. You can't get more hits than you have at bats. You can't give more effort than all your effort because, if you have more effort to give, you weren't giving all your effort in the first place. Salaries, on the other hand, are fluid wholes because the whole can increase. So, if you take a hardball and inflate it with enough force, you have a softball, yet both are whole balls, although I submit the parameters of the whole -- the operable paradigm -- have been altered. So, in that regard, I will submit an "oops." Nevertheless, I just want to see Cato give us 110%. Then I will be a true believer. Does that make everybody happy, at peace and with a little smile?
I don't think that Cato should feel "intimidated' on likely getting the starting job, he should be exciting and ready to live up to the challenge instead of just playing crappy.
