The poster I was responding to said they were both better off without eachother and they couldn't coexist. If it was as extreme as that, I wouldn't expect their Win% to be so high when playing together, and so low when they don't. And do I think we'd be better with Deng or Redd replacing T-Mac? Assuming McGrady doesn't miss a significant stretch of games the rest of the season, no I do not.
I would agree with this.....PROBABLY....it really depends on whether Tmac gets with the program and starts to run, or not. DD
I guess this is where we differ. If T-Mac continues to play the way he's played most of the season when healthy, I think he's better for us than Deng or Redd this season. Do I wish he did even more? Sure.
There are issues with TMac at RA's motion offense. Thus far in the season, the motion offense stops when TMac is on the court. Don't know why. Ask TMac and RA.
I've said this before and I'll say it again: Name any group of players we could realistically get in exchange for Tracy McGrady. Then ask yourself: Would you, as GM of the Rockets, trade those players to get Tracy McGrady. The answer is always yes.
That is for sure. I think T-mac is a much better passer than those two as well. I reckon T-Mac's determination, commission will be always questionable due to his personality. His health is always worrying everybody. I feel sometimes he is too honest to be just as himself. That actually might hurt the others badly. I, personally, will be happier if we could have T-mac and Yao going till the day of Championship(with our three ROOKIES, or still ROOKIES? )
