Cuttino's defense last game has been briefly mentioned but I think we should better acknowledge his efforts. Christie came in on Tuesday nite averaging nearly 20pts, 7ast, and 60% FG, 60% 3PT. He came out of the game 2-8FG, 0-4 3PT, and only 6PTS. And I know we didn't play much zone either. Christie's not the key like Iverson is but he's played well all season. With Cuttino's athleticism and strength, he could be a very good defender. His only problem is his height so it'll be interesting to see how he does against the taller-jump-over-you guards such as Kobe or Finley. But from what I've seen, the effort is there and defense certainly starts with effort.
I think we are all pretty happy with the Sac game. Catino's all around play was definately improved. The only point I want to add to, or differ on, from MacBeth's post was the phrase of "only one turnover" for Mobley. In my opinion he has several turnovers a game that do not show up in the box score. Jacking up a low percentage shot, out of synch with the offense (ie not much chance for a rebound) is the same thing as a turnover (ie often leads to a fast break for the opponent). This shows up as a missed shot attempt, not as a turnover and not as the overall negative effect it had on the game. By the way, I didn't see a lot of jack ups by Mobley, just want to make a point about statistics. To further that point; Glen Rice. Is it possible that his calling a meeting was the thing that won the game. Is it possible that was the single most important action of the game. If this turns out to be the game that gives us confidence, promotes team play. and sets the tone for the season, then Glen 1-7 Rice is the key. Maybe not, but maybe yes. My point being stats don't show everything, and sometimes miss the most obvious aspects of the game.
