1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Kevin Drum] If you hate the culture wars, blame liberals

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Os Trigonum, Jul 6, 2021.

  1. Spooner

    Spooner Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    2,844

    Im not sure how to even address this any further. Europeans made European music wow what a concept. Who specifically wasn’t elevated? What is the real issue here? It sounds to me like a manufactured inferiority complex to account for why there were specifically no singular African musicians, painters or philosophers among other things during this time that are remembered by people. No one of any other race cares how they were represented in European music.

    Instead of lumping all of Europe together, consider why Germans and Russians were elevated more than any other culture in this period. You still seem to think people in every country in Europe were benefited the same. Assuming all Europeans had the same experience because of the color of their skin is RACIST. Germany and Russia had the best pedagogy and institutions at the time. So what. Europeans invented classical music and invented written music. Not everything has to be about inclusiveness. Not every country in every century is the USA in 2021. What kind of society is this where we can’t even appreciate the foundation of art without imposing our own limited belief systems into music. This is music. It doesn’t belong in this stupid bullshit. Music theory is addressing the physical nature of sound. It’s a science. European music came from the overtone series which was created by Pythagorus who was not a musician. It is a science revealing all partials contained in a note. Every composer innovated based on this scientific principle that aligns our ears with NATURE. Geometry follows the natural order of the universe and the foundations of music are no different. Americans have completely lost what this means in their souls and hearts. Completely lost.

    I don’t get mad often. I’m certainly not prone to outrage. I’m very reserved. You won’t see me in this part of the forum except for rarely making fun of a conservative because I think it’s funny. I looked over those articles again with a cooler head for only the second time. None of this is by Republicans. Do you really think classicfm is Republican propaganda? You are lost. Classicfm is a website that is very popular among classical musicians. They have tons and tons of diversity initiatives and grants. They were extremely political against Trump. They are constantly trying to bring African Americans into the arts. A classical music website can't have an opinion about classical music? You just assume it’s Republican propaganda because the arts are above cancel culture.

    The last article entitled “Beethoven is above average at best” or something of that nature was written by Ewell himself. It says it under the title and his biography which I found quite illuminating is at the end of the “essay”. So in fact there are essays being written by cancel culture or whatever you want to call this particular sickness pervading our society and I have every right to question that. I can’t make sense of the article. It’s an unintelligible mess littered with catchphrases and a factually inaccurate and intentionally misleading account of history. I can’t bring myself to even finish something so poorly thought out, tedious and bad. Not everyone is going to fall for that. The essay is such a confusing mess with no tangible point about anything that you labeled it as Republican propaganda and now I guess you’ll go back to supporting it for the third time. You literally called the guy you are defending a propagandist for the Republican Party.

    I refrain from doing this ever in my life but this has become personal. Ewell teaches at Hunter college. Please. No esteemed musician is going to take him seriously. He’s an absolute nobody. Schenker is offered at every university and conservatory. It is forced on no one. He specifically went after an well known theorist to build a name for himself. He couldn’t do it on his own since his whole musical methodology is whiteness and blackness. No academics take him seriously otherwise his thoughts on this issue would be peer reviewed. Instead he has to write think pieces which hold more weight than any academic paper to the general public because p*rnography is free in droves and you have to pay for academic research. Good job society. If he had anything at all of value to say he would answer the repeated calls from academics to sit down and talk about the issues but he refuses. He knows his ideas would not hold up for a second because academics actually know things. The only actual theorist in this whole pointless exercise won in the eyes of the law. I guess that the American justice system is a bad thing too. Ewell is a clown who conveniently chose to be educated in racist Russia, his expertise is on Russian classical music(he never studied anything to do with Beethoven) and plays an Italian instrument. I assumed that essay was written by a 17 year old. All he's done is hurt black people for his own good by keeping them from claiming their own culture. He's Ben Carson.

    From the 1920s to 1980, African Americans were the dominant voice in American culture. Rich white people could not stand this. It doesn't mean these white people cared about the arts they simply didn't want black people to have power. African Americans had the worst hill to climb of any race without a doubt and they elevated themselves to be America's voice. The United States used African American music as a tool for diplomacy in the Cold War because that was our best music at the time. Every African American artist in this period of time knew their roots because it was passed from Africa through slavery to them and is present in their music.

    Republicans are responsible for every question I've brought up. Reagan and Bush did everything they could to make African Americans lose their culture so that power could be restored to white people. With culture comes power. When did this trend of African American dominance end? You do the math. The worst two decades for jazz BY FAR happened because of 12 years of systemic suppression of African American culture. From 1981 to 2009 African Americans were kept from their own heritage by white people. A lot of damage can be done in 30 years. Obama knew exactly what to do. He wanted not only funding in the arts for African American neighborhoods which needed it BADLY but wanted the history of Jazz to be taught in schools. This is something we are still advocating for. What people might not realize is Obama knew a hell of a lot about music. He knew the history of Africa was in this African American art form. He knew that Republicans systematically prevented Black people from discovering and understanding their roots. People got lynched for playing African polyrhythms as slaves in an attempt to suppress their culture and Blacks were resilient enough to keep their own native traditions alive. The kind of resilience it takes to keep your tradition alive through slavery and 50 years after slavery those traditions were the voice of American culture is unbelievably special. Obama couldn't even really get what he wanted done because of Republicans. And why would that be? After that, everything he did was dismantled by Betsy Devos. Everything. For 8 years. No arts funding in African American communities, no Jazz history or African history taught in schools. We had an 8 year window in the last 40 years and Republicans fought every bit of those 8 years to keep African Americans from claiming the heritage that is theirs, suppress the understanding of their own roots and feed them with the lowest forms of propaganda. There has always been music used as propaganda. Its the main reason people wanted to cancel Wagner and if there was any person to cancel, he would be the guy. He made music that was used as propaganda for Nazi Germany not to mention his extreme level of sexism. He is universally known as the worst human being to come out of classical music and yet we still use his music in wedding ceremonies. What did Republicans do when Trump came in? Let's not just cut all funding and education toward black people regarding their culture, music and heritage, let's find strippers and make them rappers who rap to unedited generic stock beats from Apple that have nothing to do with Africa. Here's your African American role models. This is all you can achieve. It is propaganda helping to keep Blacks from understanding their roots and making them feel inferior in art and inferior as people. Blacks need to claim their roots because music was much better objectively when that was the case. It's a very large reason I'm a musician. Instead of addressing gun nut conspiracy theorist republicans who don't care about any music let alone Beethoven and just want to make sure Blacks are powerless, we go after a tool used in music theory 150 years ago that 99% of the population knows nothing about and will never use. Maybe if African Americans claimed their roots our society wouldn't need to belittle composers without even the slightest coherent argument or cancel things. Maybe they wouldn't constantly ask why they weren't included enough in 1700's Europe instead of just appreciating art for what it is like the rest of the entire world does. If they knew the power they have in their own lineage I doubt African Americans would care what anyone thinks of them, would not feel the need to belittle anything and would realize how important in history they actually are. If republicans actually allowed Black people to be one with their roots again, we wouldn't need to change the English language with pseudo catchphrases and buzzwords. I want Black music to be THE music of America. I genuinely want this. Nothing I said in anything I wrote is Black peoples fault. When it comes to culture, Republicans have systematically stifled them to the point that they can no longer identify their roots. I dont see how any of this helps them to reclaim it.
     
    #141 Spooner, Jul 9, 2021
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2021
  2. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,570
    Likes Received:
    14,311
    What are conservatives trying to "conserve"?
     
    Spooner likes this.
  3. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,153
    Likes Received:
    2,819
    Literally no one here has said slavery had nothing do with the civil war. Even the argument that the motivation was economic is still about slavery.
    The Constitution was written almost 80 years before secession, by people who were no longer alive. Also the purpose of the 3/5 compromise was to convince the south to join the Union in the first place, so they would have roughly electoral and legislative parity with the northern states. That is a political/economic reason for it's inclusion, not a moral one.
    I doubt there are any pro-slavery people on ClutchFans. Certainly none who are going to admit it. I wouldn't characterize all of the slaveholders as monsters through. Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, most of the founding fathers owned slaves. It was a common practice at the time and the understanding of morality was different. Obviously, if they advocated for slavery in modern times they would be viewed as monsters, but taken in the context in which they lived, they were great but flawed men.
    It is almost certain that the secession was political/economic and not based on the moral imperative that slavery of Africans continue.
    Not only is every defense of the border wall primarily economic, you are even misconstruing Trump. Even he, clown that he was, did not believe every illegal immigrant from Mexico was a rapist or a murder. Even the speech you are quoting didn't suggest that.
    He was wrong, of course. Our best data indicates native born people are more criminal than illegal immigrants (unless you include their unlawful border crossing, at which point 100% of that cohort would be criminals). That he was wrong doesn't mean he was advocating building the wall for fear of rapists. Nor does a single speech represent the entirety of the reasoning for building the wall. The wall was meant to combat illegal immigration, which has always had an economic component.
     
  4. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,183
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    You make a lot of assumptions and strawman's hear, and you make a lot of weird factual mistatements.

    I didn't say all Europeans are the same. I am not attacking western culture or western music, nor am I saying anything bad about Beethoven. All I am saying is that the idea the left is trying to cancel Beethoven IS propaganda. You still have not offered once inkling of evidence that people on the left want to cancel Beethoven. I am not saying anything about classicfm either.

    And no, it wasn't just the German's and Russia's who contributed to the creation of great classical music. Italians, Greeks, and the English all played roles. Chopin was Polish.

    No the Europeans did not invent written music - other cultures had done that before but it was lost. "Europeans" (ironic that you treat all Europeans the same here but not when it comes to classical music), invented modern musical notation. Just correcting your facts, sir.

    This isn't about knocking European music. You act like all great music follows European musical theory based on science like it's universal mathematical principles. It's not. Look at Indian classical music. It's far older than Western classical music and breaks many of the rules. No chords, No 8 note scales, no harmony, etc. Had Indian colonized the world instead of the Europeans, you'd probably be singing the praises of Indian music as the greatest music and pushing back against people who asked, "what about European music".
     
  5. Colt45

    Colt45 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2000
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    3,011
    FIFY
     
  6. jiggyfly

    jiggyfly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    21,011
    Likes Received:
    16,856
    How the hell are you getting me defending slave holders?

    And you have the nerve to say I am on unstable ground?

    I,m out because you are just making **** up and not actually debating what I said and then in the last paragraph you try and use my own argument against me.

    You are delusional.
     
    StupidMoniker likes this.
  7. vlaurelio

    vlaurelio Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    21,310
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    white people
     
    fchowd0311 and Colt45 like this.
  8. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,472
    Likes Received:
    121,843
    https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/what-happened-to-you-e5f

    What Happened To You?
    The radicalization of the American elite against liberalism
    Andrew Sullivan
    Jul 9

    “What happened to you?”

    It’s a question I get a lot on Twitter. “When did you become so far right?” “Why have you become a white supremacist, transphobic, misogynistic eugenicist?” Or, of course: “See! I told you who he really was! Just take the hood off, Sully!” It’s trolling, mainly. And it’s a weapon for some in the elite to wield against others in the kind of emotional blackmail spiral that was first pioneered on elite college campuses. But it’s worth answering, a year after I was booted from New York Magazine for my unacceptable politics. Because it seems to me that the dynamic should really be the other way round.

    The real question is: what happened to you?

    The CRT debate is just the latest squall in a tempest brewing and building for five years or so. And, yes, some of the liberal critiques of a Fox News hyped campaign are well taken. Is this a wedge issue for the GOP? Of course it is. Are they using the term “critical race theory” as a cynical, marketing boogeyman? Of course they are. Are some dog whistles involved? A few. Are crude bans on public servants’ speech dangerous? Absolutely. Do many of the alarmists know who Derrick Bell was? Of course not.

    But does that mean there isn’t a real issue here? Of course it doesn’t.

    Take a big step back. Observe what has happened in our discourse since around 2015. Forget CRT for a moment and ask yourself: is nothing going on here but Republican propaganda and guile? Can you not see that the Republicans may be acting, but they are also reacting — reacting against something that is right in front of our noses?

    What is it? It is, I’d argue, the sudden, rapid, stunning shift in the belief system of the American elites. It has sent the whole society into a profound cultural dislocation. It is, in essence, an ongoing moral panic against the specter of “white supremacy,” which is now bizarrely regarded as an accurate description of the largest, freest, most successful multiracial democracy in human history.

    We all know it’s happened. The elites, increasingly sequestered within one political party and one media monoculture, educated by colleges and private schools that have become hermetically sealed against any non-left dissent, have had a “social justice reckoning” these past few years. And they have been ideologically transformed, with countless cascading consequences.

    Take it from a NYT woke star, Kara Swisher, who celebrated this week that “the country’s social justice movement is reshaping how we talk about, well, everything.” She’s right — and certainly about the NYT and all mainstream journalism.

    This is the media hub of the “social justice movement.” And the core point of that movement, its essential point, is that liberalism is no longer enough. Not just not enough, but itself a means to perpetuate “white supremacy,” designed to oppress, harm and terrorize minorities and women, and in dire need of dismantling. That’s a huge deal. And it explains a lot.

    The reason “critical race theory” is a decent approximation for this new orthodoxy is that it was precisely this exasperation with liberalism’s seeming inability to end racial inequality in a generation that prompted Derrick Bell et al. to come up with the term in the first place, and Kimberlé Crenshaw to subsequently universalize it beyond race to every other possible dimension of human identity (“intersectionality”).

    A specter of invisible and unfalsifiable “systems” and “structures” and “internal biases” arrived to hover over the world. Some of this critique was specific and helpful: the legacy of redlining, the depth of the wealth gap. But much was tendentious post-modern theorizing. The popular breakthrough was Ta-Nehisi Coates’ essay on reparations in the Atlantic and his subsequent, gut-wrenching memoir, “Between The World And Me.” He combined the worldview and vocabulary of CRT with the vivid lived experience of his own biography. He is a beautifully gifted writer, and I am not surprised he had such an emotional impact, even if, in my view, the power of his prose blinded many to the radical implications of the ideology he surrendered to, in what many of his blog readers called his “blue period.”

    The movement is much broader than race — as anyone who is dealing with matters of sex and gender will tell you. The best moniker I’ve read to describe this mishmash of postmodern thought and therapy culture ascendant among liberal white elites is Wesley Yang’s coinage: “the successor ideology.” The “structural oppression” is white supremacy, but that can also be expressed more broadly, along Crenshaw lines: to describe a hegemony that is saturated with “anti-Blackness,” misogyny, and transphobia, in a miasma of social “cis-heteronormative patriarchal white supremacy.” And the term “successor ideology” works because it centers the fact that this ideology wishes, first and foremost, to repeal and succeed a liberal society and democracy.

    In the successor ideology, there is no escape, no refuge, from the ongoing nightmare of oppression and violence — and you are either fighting this and “on the right side of history,” or you are against it and abetting evil. There is no neutrality. No space for skepticism. No room for debate. No space even for staying silent. (Silence, remember, is violence — perhaps the most profoundly anti-liberal slogan ever invented.)

    And that tells you about the will to power behind it. Liberalism leaves you alone. The successor ideology will never let go of you. Liberalism is only concerned with your actions. The successor ideology is concerned with your mind, your psyche, and the deepest recesses of your soul. Liberalism will let you do your job, and let you keep your politics private. S.I. will force you into a struggle session as a condition for employment.

    What happened to me? You know what I want to know: What on earth has happened to you?

    I have exactly the same principles and support most of the same policies I did under Barack Obama. In fact, I’ve moved left on economic and foreign policy since then. It’s Democrats who have taken a sudden, giant swerve away from their recent past.

    At the moment, I’m recording an audiobook for a new collection of my writing, from 1989 - 2021, “Out On A Limb,” to be published next month. (More to come on that next week.) It covers the Obama years, including my impression in May 2007 that he’d be the next president and why I found him so appealing a figure. It’s been a shocking reminder of how our politics has been transformed since then:

    My favorite moment was a very simple one. He referred to the anniversary of the March on Selma, how he went and how he came back and someone (I don’t remember who now) said to him: “That was a great celebration of African-American history.” To which Obama said he replied: “No, no, no, no, no. That was not a great celebration of African-American history. That was a celebration of American history.”

    How much further can you get from the ideology of the 1619 Project — that rejects any notion of white contributions to black freedom? In his Jeremiah Wright speech, the best of his career, this is what Obama said of Wright’s CRT-inspired words, damning America:

    They expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country — a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America... The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country — a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old — is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past.

    This is what I still believe. Do you?

    more
     
  9. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,472
    Likes Received:
    121,843
    conclusion

    A plank of successor ideology, for example, is that the only and exclusive reason for racial inequality is “white supremacy.” Culture, economics, poverty, criminality, family structure: all are irrelevant, unless seen as mere emanations of white control. Even discussing these complicated factors is racist, according to Ibram X Kendi.

    Obama was a straddler, of course, and did not deny that “so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.” I don’t deny that either. Who could? But neither did he deny African-American agency or responsibility:

    It means taking full responsibility for own lives — by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

    To say this today would evoke instant accusations of being a white supremacist and racist. That’s how far the left has moved: Obama as an enabler of white supremacy. You keep asking: what happened to me? I remain an Obamacon, same as I always have been. What, in contrast, has happened to you?

    Check out this really insightful interview of Wes Yang by Matt Taibbi. Yang beautifully explains the radical shift in elite opinion. He notes the ascending rhetoric: “So there’s a line in an n+1 essay, where the person is saying, ‘Oh, we are now menaced by whiteness and masculinity.’ Whereas in the past, we would have said, ‘Oh, we’re menaced by racism and sexism.’” He sees what this movement is about: the end of due process, the rejection of even an attempt at objectivity, a belief in active race and sex discrimination (“equity”) to counter the legacy of the past, the purging of ideological diversity, and the replacement of liberal education with left-indoctrination.

    Yang sees the attempt to dismantle the entire carapace of liberal society and liberal institutions: “[The proponents of the successor ideology are] not trying to be malicious, but they are trying to basically annihilate a lot of the foundational processes that we depend upon and then remake them anew. You operate from the starting point that all the previous ideologies, methods, and processes are untrustworthy, because they produced this outcome previously, so we’ve got to remake all of them.” Precisely. This is a revolution against liberalism commanded from above.

    Look how far the left’s war on liberalism has gone.

    Due process? If you’re a male on campus, gone. Privacy? Stripped away — by anonymous rape accusations, exposure of private emails, violence against people’s private homes, screaming at folks in restaurants, sordid exposés of sexual encounters, eagerly published by woke mags. Non-violence? Exceptions are available if you want to “punch a fascist.” Free speech? Only if you don’t mind being fired and ostracized as a righteous consequence. Free association? You’ve got to be kidding. Religious freedom? Illegitimate bigotry. Equality? Only group equity counts now, and individuals of the wrong identity can and must be discriminated against. Color-blindness? Another word for racism. Mercy? Not for oppressors. Intent? Irrelevant. Objectivity? A racist lie. Science? A manifestation of white supremacy. Biological sex? Replaced by socially constructed gender so that women have penises and men have periods. The rule of law? Not for migrants or looters. Borders? Racist. Viewpoint diversity? A form of violence against the oppressed.

    It is absolutely no accident that this illiberal ideology has no qualms whatever with illiberal methods. The latter springs intrinsically from the former. Kendi, feted across the establishment, favors amending the Constitution to appoint an unelected and unaccountable committee of “experts” that has the power to coerce and punish any individual or group anywhere in the country deemed practicing racism. Intent does not matter. And the decisions are final. An advocate for unaccountable, totalitarian control of our society is the darling of every single elite institution in America, and is routinely given platforms where no tough questioning of him is allowed. He is as dumb as Obama is smart; as crude as Obama is nuanced; as authoritarian as Obama is liberal.

    Or check out Kevin Drum’s analysis of asymmetric polarization these past few decades. He shows relentlessly that over the past few decades, it’s Democrats who have veered most decisively to the extremes on policy on cultural issues since the 1990s. Not Republicans. Democrats.

    On immigration, Republicans have moved around five points to the right; the Democrats 35 points to the left. On abortion, Republicans who advocate a total ban have increased their numbers a couple of points since 1994; Democrats who favor legality in every instance has risen 20 points. On guns, the GOP has moved ten points right; Dems 20 points left.

    It is also no accident that, as Drum notes and as David Shor has shown: “white academic theories of racism — and probably the whole woke movement in general —have turned off many moderate Black and Hispanic voters.” This is why even a huge economic boom may not be enough to keep the Democrats in power next year.

    We are going through the greatest radicalization of the elites since the 1960s. This isn’t coming from the ground up. It’s being imposed ruthlessly from above, marshaled with a fusillade of constant MSM propaganda, and its victims are often the poor and the black and the brown. It nearly lost the Democrats the last election. Only Biden’s seeming moderation, the wisdom of black Democratic primary voters, and the profound ugliness of Trump wrested the presidency from a vicious demagogue, whose contempt for our system of government appears ever greater the more we find out about his term in office.

    But as Wes Yang notes, Biden has also aided and abetted and justified this radicalism. He has instituted a huge program of overt government race and sex discrimination throughout every policy and area of government; he backs decimating due process for sexual accusations on campus; he favors abolishing religious freedom as a defense of anti-gay discrimination; he believes that gender identity should replace sex as a legal category, and gender identity should rest entirely on self-disclosure; he favors expediting and maximizing mass immigration, not stemming it. In Yang’s rather brutal assessment, for the hard left, “what they saw is that with Joe Biden, who’s this throwback figure, the activists could all rush to him and get most of what they wanted from him anyway.”

    Does that mean we should support an increasingly nihilist cult on the right among the GOP? Of course not. Does it mean we should ignore its increasingly menacing contempt for electoral integrity and a stable democracy? Absolutely not. But one reason to fight for liberalism against the successor ideology is that its extremes are quite obviously fomenting and facilitating and inspiring ever-rising fanaticism in response. I fear the successor ideology’s Kulturkampf is already making the 2022 midterms a landslide for a cultish, unmoored GOP. In fighting S.I., we are also fighting Trump.

    But I am not making a tactical argument here. I’m making a deeper moral argument. We can and must still fight and argue for what we believe in: a liberal democracy in a liberal society. This fight will not end if we just ignore it or allow ourselves to be intimidated by it, or join the tribal pile-ons. And I will not apologize for confronting this, however unpopular it might make me, just as I won’t apologize for confronting the poison and nihilism on the right. And if you really want to be on “the right side of liberalism,” you will join me.​
     
  10. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    There it is.

    We will PSA out of the 1000% wealth gap.

    Black people. Be good fathers.

    Problem solved. **** that was easy.

    8f only this guy wasn't in a bubble and actually was curious about early childhood brain development and understood that the highest probabilistic route to create good parents is a nurtured environment from ages 0-10.

    And this is also a strawman. Individually no one is saying don't personally responsible or don't try in school or just give up on life because everything is stacked against you. You loot, you get prosecuted. You abandon your child and don't pay child support, you get prosecuted. Yes, personal responsibility is important but to pretend changing the path of millions of people through PSAs akin to herding cats. It doesn't work. It never works.
     
  11. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    1,630
    Many many people have argued, as it has been suggested repeatedly here, that slavery was motivated more by the economic factors than any sense of superiority. Case in point: See your next paragraph.

    The cornerstone speech outlines very clearly that white superiority is a moral issue. Granted, it's 80 years later ...but how does one even get to the point that only black people are counted as less than whole? There something deeper happening there. Again, it's not economics. To suggest the intentions behind the 3/5 rule are rooted in politics/economics is revisionist history. Whites felt morally superior to blacks or this concept is never even raised.

    I'm not suggesting there are pro-slavery people on the BBS. I'm suggesting that anybody that believe the primary drivers were economic in nature are delusional and suffer revisionist history. It's not economic, it's white supremacy. Call a spade a spade.

    The notion that our founding fathers were flawed men is very true. Some were outright monsters. Jefferson was a proud southerner and staunch supporter of the institution of slavery. Washington had some repentance later. Their words, "All men are created equal" was wise beyond even their own understanding. However, it speaks volumes that they did not view blacks as men.

    Again, go read the corner-stone speech. He VERY clearly outlines the moral authority as says exactly that. It's not economic. The fact that we are debating if we should maintain confederate statues today is not economic. It's 99% white people that want to preserve these statues. Why is that?

    Trump is a master at never saying exactly what he means but you clearly understand. Cohen is even on record stating that is his MO. He's smart enough to know he can't make declarative statements but he clearly makes the point. He walked that line as tight as he could when he told the Proud Pays to 'stand by, stand down'. He had plausible deniability but the message was received. So those that want to, can defend his statement while everybody on the inside winks at each other.

    Seriously, America needs to stop justifying our horrific past. The fact that our founding father's ideals transcended far beyond anything they could imagine is amazing. America genuinely is one of history's greatest success stories. But we need to be honest with ourselves about our horrific history and that will enable us to move on.

    Today in Germany, they have no Nazi statues in the streets. They openly acknowledge and are embarrassed by the dark stain on their history. They have moved on and are now the leader of the EU. Nobody tries to justify Hitler's behavior as just being a product of the times. In fact, Hitler literally studied how America managed to build a society built on white supremacy as a model and how he can implement systemic racism.

    America was built on white supremacy. Until we acknowledge that, it will persist.
     
    mdrowe00 and Invisible Fan like this.
  12. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,785
    Likes Received:
    41,212
    I think you need to use larger fonts.
     
    Os Trigonum likes this.
  13. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,472
    Likes Received:
    121,843
  14. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    1,630
    It's an over simplification in typical western fashion ...presented as a binary situation.

    Nobody is all liberal or all conservative. If you are a black liberal, you think opinions have changed much? Even if you do, what does "black" even mean? Conservatives loved to call Obama "half black".

    All I can say is this, if you go back to the source/beginning, it was conservatives who started the culture war. Full stop.
     
    mdrowe00 and VooDooPope like this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now