Jordan Hill was 0-4 tonight. Is this guy really worth it?

No he's not. But its not like the Rockets are breaking the bank for Hill.

Its whatever the market gives you. I seriously doubt management is so enamoured by Jordan Hill that they're passing up Andre Iguodala for him.

 

J. Dorsey DNP - Coach's Decision. Is this guy really worth it?

 

You FOrgot about the biggest factor----------size..

6'11 is gonna be a huge factor when against those lakers trees

 

From the games I saw him play, he seems like a good energy player especially on the defensive end.

 

I trust Morey.

 

Stromile Swift in making

 

LOL already one of these ?

 

Potential to be another role player, sure isn't star potential.

 

OK he's 22. Don't be a jackass.

He's a 22 year old rookie no one will know for a couple of years.


There, you feel better?

 

Yao Ming didn't play tonight, should we trade this guy since he can't even get off the bench?

 

Ceiling is a rich man's Mikki Moore

 

i was watching the game and the guy looked pretty lost. he does have good size at the PF, and as others have noted he has potential. lets see what Morey does. maybe his cruddy play makes our point of not including our 2010 first round pick even stronger.

 

Maybe his hair, but Jordan Hill is not going to be a bust...

 

What Morey thinks>>>>>>>>>>>>>What we think. I trust him.

 

Sam Cassell was a 24 year old rookie.

Aren't we happy it's Morey as our GM not some Barkley hating clutchfan?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KBJ8MfQKmQA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KBJ8MfQKmQA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

David Andersen - 18 points

Do we really need another big man?

 

The Rockets aren't going out of their way to reach out to the Knicks because they covet Jordan Hill so much they are in hot pursuit. With the size of T-Mac's contract and the trouble it brings in terms of trading him, we are limited to who we can actually deal with. The Knicks are one of the few teams that have the pieces to make a deal and their assets are limited. Jordan Hill is a key piece of the deal but he's not the sole reason we would make it. Every piece we are taking back as a whole, is what makes this deal good. We unload T-Mac's expiring contract for:

a) A smaller expiring contract (A move towards our future)
b) A young, high ceiling big man (A move towards our future)
c) Potentially move up in the first round one year, an additional first round pick another year, and I may be wrong but have I heard another second round pick? (A move towards our future)

Look at our team RIGHT NOW. We are NOT in win now mode. Yes, we have a decent record but let's be realistic....we can NOT compete with our current team as is (and when I say "as is" i mean the active players we have right now). We are preparing ourselves for the long run by collecting assets, which in today's world, 1st round draft picks are pretty hot commodities. Yes, Hill is important to this deal but he's not the SOLE reason we're making it. This isn't like the McGrady deal that landed him here where HE was the SOLE reason we traded away Francis and Mobley. Coming out of college Hill was known for being on the unpolished side but that doesn't mean he's terrible. This is his FIRST year, give him a couple of seasons before you knee jerk him out as the worst player in the NBA after just half a season.

 

Talent-wise or hair styling wise?

 

Your must be crazy! Everybody has missed 4 shots in a row.