Who do you guys feel like is the better overall player throughout their career. Steve Nash is still playing, but just go by what he has done so far. Stockton's Career: GP GS MPG FG% 3PT% FT% RPG APG SPG BPG PPG Career 1504 1300 31.8 .515 .384 .826 2.7 10.5 2.2 .2 13.1 10× NBA All-Star (1989–1997, 2000) NBA All-Star Game MVP (1993) 2× All-NBA First Team (1994–1995) 6× All-NBA Second Team (1988–1990, 1992–1993, 1996) 3× All-NBA Third Team (1991, 1997, 1999) 5× NBA All-Defensive Second Team (1989, 1991–1992, 1995, 1997) Steve Nash: Career 1139 980 31.4 .491 .428 .903 3.0 8.6 .8 .1 14.5 2× NBA Most Valuable Player (2005, 2006) 8× NBA All-Star (2002–2003, 2005–2008, 2010, 2012) 3× All-NBA First Team (2005–2007) 2× All-NBA Second Team (2008, 2010) 2× All-NBA Third Team (2002–2003)
Here are some highlight videos for both of them: Stockton: <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/myMvojT6zIc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Nash: <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NWyetpWh-yc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
John Stockton played for Utah so Steve Nash wins by default. Plus, Nash had longer hair throughout his career and that accounts for a lot when deciding between the two.
Oh and who could forget: <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WhDi0Ce_Z5w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
If you replaced Stockton with Nash on that Jazz team with Malone, Nash might even have better numbers on the offensive side.