1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Jim Jackson as PG?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by thumbs, Nov 27, 2003.

  1. blazer_ben

    blazer_ben Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    oh na, i was suggesting desmon as as a PG, but he can play the point forward position pretty good. i think a deal like mobley and cato for TJ FORD( unlikely) or erick srtickland( a solid big point guard) and desmond. MOT can fill in for cato and strickland and mason more then make up for cuttino. dont kid you're self though some here bash mobley he has value since he's contract is a bargin and maybe he can really flourish under different system.



    mobley and cato for micheal reed and toni kukoc? will the bucks do it i doubt it.
     
  2. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,316
    Likes Received:
    14,752
    Mobley isn't going to be happy sharing minutes with Redd, because he would have to come off the bench. I would keep him on the Rockets.
     
  3. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    As I said earlier, wild and crazy trades don't make the Rockets a better team because we lose core players and gain players with flaws as big or bigger than before. IMO the Rockets just need to get players into the roles for which they are suited.

    Like it or not, Taylor is a better all-around PF than Cato. Cato is a better all-around C than Taylor. Jackson may be a better all around PG than Francis, etc. etc. Do ya'll get my drift here? We have the players -- JVG just needs to shape them into the roles for which they are best designed.
     

Share This Page