1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Jim Crane

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Rvo384, Jul 16, 2023.

  1. tehG l i d e

    tehG l i d e Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,746
    Likes Received:
    17,826
    Just curious...where's all that money Crane saved from not re-signing JV the first time? I remember their was about 15-20 mil left after the Abreu, Montero, and Brantley signings. I think it was assumed it was going to be used to upgrade the team at the trade deadline. Crane was willing to sacrifice our 2 prospects to save money and get JV with the Mets paying off a substantial cut of his salary. Are we really sure he's not cheap?
     
    IBTL and cmlmel77 like this.
  2. InTheGroove

    InTheGroove Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2022
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    637
    Multi-posting for posterity, apologies CF...

    Dusty Baker knows its his last year here... (IDGAF who you are, thats a check that'll cash on Christmas Day)
    MLB "knows" its Baker's last year as the Astros GM...
    Dusty Baker has been literally tinkering- and quite literally doing EVERYTHING OPPOSITE of last year, running out NOT the best hitting lineups (whenever those best hitters in the lineups have been consistently healthy, respectively).
    All the quotes Baker's been making recently-- whether they're pushed by a media agenda or if its really just diarrhea spewing from his mouth... only leads me to think:
    (just as we've talked about fellas, Crane was "forced" into hiring Baker as a "****, let me clean up my personal business mess and this mess with the Astros"-- so yeah, we'll get him a ring and hold on to him as long as we can bc "optics"...)
    ...leads me to think: Dusty Baker is an employee of MLB, not Jim Crane's Houston Astros organization-- unless that was already decided back in the owners meetings & Jim agreed to it... we're gonna suppress this Astros surge / narrative and we'll make sure we have a mole to do just the best chance of that-- cue Dusty Baker.
    We were always supposed to have JV... and tbh, our record just may have been a few wins here or there better (lineup or not, shitty catchers, rising studs, forgotten heroes matters not). JV was a Crane move... every single call up / send down move has been with Baker's signature/advice on it.
    Players oblivious, but Manfred, the media fcks around the country, the owners / managers know exactly how the 2023 Astros season will play out.
    I can't believe anymore that we even have a WS defending team with the managerial FCKINGASININE blatant shhitbag moves / decisions that have been made this year... Dana Brown is probably white-knuckling the fck outta this season knowing he can't affect it.

    This isn't a negative post about being down on the WS this year-- friends, we weren't supposed to get back there this year. All those who aren't players know that.
    When was the last time you saw Jim Crane or Dana Brown or anyone in the media (non-player) actually step up and defend Dusty Baker's shake-n-bakes this season...???

    #ready2haveawinningstudbaseballclub2getbehindagain

    Yeah-- this is the worst (Astros) team (NOT ON PAPER) I've seen at least since back, what 8-9-10 years ago+ ... its a fvcking JOKE to be a lifelong Astros fan right now.
     
    raining threes and Htown Stros like this.
  3. marks0223

    marks0223 2017 and 2022 World Series Champions
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,682
    Likes Received:
    16,906
    Pretty sure Graveman and JV go beyond 15-20 million. Crane wasn't happy with Click last year when Click didn't make trades to get the Astros closer to the luxury tax limit. As far as the Mets paying JV, there was a quote from Steve Cohen saying he considered the Max and JV contracts as spent money and wasn't going to trade them just to save money. He only wanted to buy prospects in a trade and that's what the Mets did.
     
  4. Htown Stros

    Htown Stros Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,179
    Likes Received:
    6,416
    Just stop. This s*** is ridiculous. It’s like some of you started watching in 2017 and/or expect us to spend like we are the Dodgers with their mega TV deal or the Mets with Cohen’s money.

    He’s been the best owner in Houston sports by a land slide. Arguably the best owner in the MLB since he took over from McLane (want to talk about cheap?). We’ve been in the top 5 in team payroll multiple years since 2017. And the others weren’t far from it. This is on top of having one of the best development/scouting and analytics departments the entire time.
     
  5. Rvo384

    Rvo384 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2022
    Messages:
    2,549
    Likes Received:
    2,160
    Lol when you can’t handle your ego being put in check, or someone telling you no does that make you the best?
     
    IBTL likes this.
  6. bloodwings19

    bloodwings19 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    4,160
    Crane said he doesn't do long-term contract which means we will never get tier 1 free-agents unless he changes his stance. Without a GM, he signed R.Montero (worst signing ever) and J.Abreu (2nd worse signing ever, Diaz is platooning at 1st). Hiring D.Brown is still up in the air, he is more reactive than a proactive GM. Rangers GM got A.Chapman (2.28 ERA), poked at the Mets first geting Max and the other pitcher from Cardinals who has been dealing since traded. The Rangers may lose because of inexperience and injury, but they had a better pick up than we did. I'm happy with Crane with 2, but I like to be greedy.
     
  7. Screaming Fist

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2018
    Messages:
    2,790
    Likes Received:
    3,275
    Crane got high on his own supply. Thought he could do no wrong.
     
    tehG l i d e likes this.
  8. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    23,734
    Likes Received:
    14,102
    The Astros roster is stacked. They aren't performing. That isn't Cranes fault, Dana Brown's fault etc.

    If Javier, Framber, Hunter Brown had been pitching to their potential the Astros would be up 5-10 games on the division.

    If Altuve, Yordan etc haven't been so beat up, then the Astros are probably 5 games up on the division.

    Its been a tough year, but next year will come and this team will still be predicted to be there in October.

    Tough year, WS hangovers are a consistent thing in this sport.
     
    Htown Stros, Bregatron, Nook and 3 others like this.
  9. IBTL

    IBTL Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    14,657
    Likes Received:
    14,845
    Crane sucks.
     
  10. lnchan

    lnchan Sugar Land Leonard
    Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    10,950
    Likes Received:
    14,132
    If Diaz and Chas were allowed to play everyday over Maldonado and Julks, we would be up 5 games.
     
  11. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    23,734
    Likes Received:
    14,102
    Prob not, but yes Dusty is not managing well this year.
     
    raining threes likes this.
  12. IdStrosfan

    IdStrosfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    7,518
    Likes Received:
    9,032
    According to Cots Contracts, the Astros are about $4.5M below the CBT. That's 98% of available salary below it and $4.5M isn't going to bring in an impact player.

    Crane has spent the money, especially considering there was no GM for the majority of the offseason.

    Calling him cheap is flat untrue.
     
  13. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,664
    Cheap? No.
    But his money wasn't well spent. Brantley ($12M), Abreu ($29M) and Montero ($11.5M) were all bad decisions in retrospect.
    $4.5M wont get an impact player, but $42M+ sure would.

    Ok, some folks will say that these deals made sense at the time. Perhaps.
    But FO's are not judged by what looked good once upon a time, they are judged by how things turn out.
     
    raining threes likes this.
  14. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,399
    Likes Received:
    6,170
    I'll respect him more if he fires Bagwell. Don't let my attitude towards a legend spoil because of what he does outside of playing. Thanks
     
  15. IdStrosfan

    IdStrosfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    7,518
    Likes Received:
    9,032
    Disagree.

    Bagwell belongs in this organization.

    He is great as color guy filling in for Blum or Sparky.

    He also has tremendous value working with prospects.

    But he absolutely should not be involved in scouting or acquisition decisions.

    Let him go impress people the nerd cave already decides needs to be an Astro but not involved in that decision.
     
    raining threes, Houstunna and jim1961 like this.
  16. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    4,399
    Likes Received:
    6,170
    That's pretty much what I would agree to, take away his administrative power. But I figure he would never relinquish that, so it's one or other with him.
     
    raining threes likes this.
  17. lnchan

    lnchan Sugar Land Leonard
    Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    10,950
    Likes Received:
    14,132
    Calling him a victim of being ensnared by Bagwell, Dusty, and Reggie is completely on point though.
     
    raining threes likes this.
  18. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,486
    Likes Received:
    15,943
    Every top tier free agent signed this winter has pretty much sucked. Here's the list:

    https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/free-agents/2023/

    It's a who's who of terrible or injured. So the only right answer judging by how things have turned out so far was "sign no one of note". Pretty sure people would have been livid with that outcome too, meaning Crane's choices are to be called either cheap or making poor decisions. Worth noting that the Orioles signed no one and look at them now.
     
  19. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,664
    Mariners got rid of folks and got better too.
    I would hope a no-decision ultimately would be better than bad ones.

    Those livid folks would have thanked Crane later if those players went on to perform like this with another team.
    But I'll grant you, doing nothing would have attracted a great deal of criticism.
     
  20. The Beard

    The Beard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    11,079
    Likes Received:
    6,571
    The Abreu contract made sense at the time

    Brantley and Montero didn't. There was no reason to guarantee Brantley 12 million. Love Uncle Mike, but he should have been brought back at a much lower number with games played incentives, and if he wouldn't do that then let him go.

    Montero was great last year, and I think will be just fine moving forward, but that was a ridiculous amount of money for him
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now