I have no problem with the two you mentioned. The assumption is that the DoJ has the evidence. We don't know if they do or do not (or more precisely, what exactly they have and the qualify of all of those evidences). Maxwell is a person, not an evidence.
she is a witness . her testimony is evidence. 'i trafficked kids to these rich assholes' is evidence. Of course the DoJ has this information. you are just lying to yourself.
I'm not asserting that she doesn't provide information, you doofus, but that we don't know what information was provided, or what information the FBI has. I was implying that your claim, that Trump is not involved due to this "information" and because the DoJ aggressively pursues Trump (another assumption), is a logical fallacy.
LOL... excuse me if I don't take the word of a proven pathologically liar, running against the wife of the guy he is accusing... with his own documented connection to epstein.
It's true they could be trying to steer the narrative and I won't put too much stock by the paper's characterization of the evidence. I feel no loyalty to Clinton anyway and would be happy to see a credible prosecution. I just pointed it out because the clickbait tweet Commodore posted made it sound like the article was going to say Clinton was guilty of something, but when you click through it says the opposite.
It isn't expected that either Clinton or Trump will be on the list of people that actually visited the island. Both of them have been on the actual plane a number of times - but they did not travel to the island.
He is a good attorney. He got a huge verdict against the Trump organization years ago. He will likely never have to work again just off the money he is going to make off Epstein Island etc.
Sounds like you are just projecting. BTW, she maintains she's innocent throughout the trial and afterward. I'm sure she was happily yapping about this client and that client while maintaining innocence.
The talking points from the article linked in this thread? It's more like the article was posted with a misleading headline and then people read the article and saw that as of now, there is nothing.
And there goes a prime example of Trump using innuendo and guilt by association. If Biden were in Trump's position, with documented connections to this guy and making statements such as the guy liking them young, and is associated with individuals (sec of labor) involved in providing a sweetheart plea deal, the Trump right would be up in arm.
Trump has lied and been deceptive so often, that a lot of people do not even judge him on the same scale as other leaders. A very smart friend of mine says "Well Trump is what we call a bullshitter - but not a liar."
