Jared Zabransky

1. He has a Z on his arm. What is he 5yrs old? Id rather have tribal on my penis.
2. He threw a pick that should of cost his school the game against OU. Only by the grace of god did his coach save his ass with ingenious play calling.
3. He isn't good. He has never been good. He is actually a horrible low percentage turnover prone idiot.
4. If he ever gets a snap in the NFL regular season EVER I will donate 50 bucks to clutchfans.
5. He will never get a snap in the NFL regular season.
6. 5yrs from now he will be on cops without a shirt.

 

Still stinging from the OU game....

 

Sig worthy.

 

VooDoo Kerse on you familee

 

1. I know lots of 5 year olds with tattoos.
2. Ziggy is jealous that Zabransky stole his idea of a "Z" tattoo.
3. He's better than Bradlee Van Pelt

 

That post may not have had a lot of merit as far as the argument goes, but it was funny; you've got to give it that.

 

Senior year (13-0): 66.3% completions, 23 TD, 8 INT. 8.98 yards per attempt. Never more than 1 INT per game. Offense scored less than 35 points once.

Against an OU team on an 8-game winning streak with a great defense...

19/29, 262 yrds (9.0 yards per attempt), 3 TDs, 1 INT... just saying.

 

Meant to quote point #3, not #2:

He isn't good. He has never been good. He is actually a horrible low percentage turnover prone idiot.

 

Get those facts outta here. You're ruining a perfectly good rant.

 

Yeah, who cares about stats when you're talking about a guy with a tattoo? Ewww, tattoo. I have to go throw up now.

 

Ok well I guess we all know to just bring up Zabransky if we want to piss Ziggy off.

 

I guess I maybe shoulda prequalified my post with these two youtube videos.

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/flfiYSf_LnU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/flfiYSf_LnU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FFNrqThFijc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FFNrqThFijc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

 

Z actually called the final play that won the game. You must of had alot of money on that game.

 

I agree with point #1, a Z on his arm is straight douche baggin lame.
I also think he's way overrated and Ryan Dinwiddie was a better QB at Boise State with less around him.

I think the undeniable fact is he can be considered better than Bradlee Van Pelt.

 

He played in an incredible game and was terrific in college, but he's not a legit NFL qb.

 

In general, if your 3rd string QB ever sees the field, you've got some serious problems. But he's better than Van Pelt and it's not like we spent a draft pick on him or anything.

 

Agreed...Let's see how this pans out...

 

Exactly.

 

In Zabransky's favor is the fact that Kubiak only likes to have 2 qb's on the gameday roster. Van Pelt is no longer eligible for the practice squad. As long as Zabransky does at least as well as VP, he'll be on the practice squad and VP will go back to doing whatever it was when the Texans picked him up off the streets last year.

That and he's got a great football name...though more for a Chicago Bears linebacker. I can picture SNL skit now...