The unofficial spokesperson for the party that wants to "defend marriage" accuses 9/11 widows of being happy their husbands are dead and says they were probably going to get divorced anyway. What an American hero.
I will argue when I choose to. I'm not sure how to say this so you will understand. I'm too smart for you to be able to use psychological tactics to badger me into participating in discussions I'm not interested in. PS: I'm smarter than you.
What evidence am I supposed to provide? Everybody here knows what her she has done. It's a difference of opinion. You think it's patriotism or whatever twisted thing you think she's doing, I think it's sedition. I was making a joke by the way... BJ keeps appealing to my sense of masculinity in saying that I need to stick around and finish arguments. Apparently he thinks females are incapable of this.
I didn't say Sheehan was patriotic or not. There is a middle ground. But if you accuse her of a crime which Sedition is, then there should be evidence. To charge someone with no evidence doesn't make for good debate or discussion. It makes the person who issued the charge look like someone who can't back up baseless charges.
Sedition is not necessarily a crime. You know exactly what it is that I'm referring to when I say that her actions are seditious. What is it you want me to submit as evidence? The articles outlining her actions? I'm not sure what that's going to accomplish.
Just for those that haven't figured it out yet. Burzmali = Nomar. I put the over/under on him getting banned again at about 6 months.
Hahaha, was anyone? Um, I don't know? How can there be a definitive answer either way to that question?
Sigh... Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government. --James Madison
