Absolutely true!...However, I'd rather the arms, legs, and head be chopped off...I can do without jumping up and down on the body after this is done...I wouldn't stop a sheepish grin though...
I hope not. If that happens, I might be forced to pay more than two minutes of attention to something attributed to her.
No but from the looks of the clothes they are wearing and the lifestyles they adopted they sure are enjoying it. Its all the same thing.... this thread is hilarious. it always amazes me how the people on the left won't hesitate to attack, gang up on, name call, dredge up any fact they can find and even distort or leave out the true surrounding details, spread propogandizing rumors like the cocain addiction which by the way there is no proof of and by any other word is known as slander, etc. to protect their own position. But don't you go and bring up one of their idiot savants and all the questionable things they have done and said....no sir Michael Moore, Al Franken, Larry King, Dan Rather, Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy....I could go on but you get my point. there are some valid points to the media comments though. ever watched the morning news shows? every lacky guest on them is spewing the exact same diatribe verbatim....its like they got their daily email from the phrase of the day club or something. The only difference between Clinton and Bush is that Bush sent Americans abroad wearing US military uniforms and Clinton sent Americans abroad wearing UN military uniforms. Per capita Clinton actually was involved in more "peace keeping" missions throughout his two term presidency then Bush, only the media gave nothing but praise to Clinton and clearly has a hatred for Bush. And there are STILL troops deployed in Kosovo and a number of other places thanks to Clinton. This much I know is true.
First of all being a Stalinist and being a communist is not hte same thing. To say that is just flaunting your own ignorance. To bring up Clinton's peace keeping mission is pointless. Iraq is not a peace keeping mission. It was a war started by this administration. Clinton never did that. The issue with the left isn't that there are troops in foreign nations. The left is largely supportive of troops being in Afghanistan. The issue is when troops are sent to invade another nation, that wasn't a threat, and are dying, and killing for no security benefit to the U.S. If you think the media gave Clinton nothing but praise, you missed a good part of the 90's. You also missed various studies posted on this bbs which showed exactly how much time the whole Lewinsky affiair was given by the press vs. how much the lead up to the Iraq war as given. In addition lumping Franken in with Coulter and comparing the two is laughable. Franken is far more accurate with his information than Coulter, and never attacked people who hadn't attacked anyone. Neither did Bill clinton or Larry King(where did that one come from?) etc. The only one on the list that is even close is Michael Moore.
