The point is the truth can hurt,...Always willing to interrupt the therapy session to give a hardfast dose of reality...
It wasn't meant to be taken seriously...Just curious to see which idiot would think I'm serious...Now we know the question to what that answer is...
Are you saying that Coulter was telling the truth? Then perhaps you can show me one time when people were prevented from speaking out against what the 9/11 widows were advocating because they were widows. It seems like the opposite is true. Ann Coulter spoke out against them personally and never was stopped, and even got more TV time after she did. I fail to see any example of the point she was making. Are you saying that it was the truth that 4 women who had their husbands die at the hands of terrorists on 9/11 are enjoying that? Do you think that they enjoyed it when they listened to their husband's final messages left from the phones? Is that what you believe to be the truth? I'd love to know.
Now that's special. You didn't mean it. Funny, if pressed, that's Coulter's common excuse too. Get real.
I am happy the group session therapy is in full effect for you with dramatic realizations and stark reality coming at you, but I question the validity of your reaction to any reason on independent thinking...You really need to work on that...
Roxran demonstrates the particular brand of cowardice of Coulter's defenders. They always leave themselves the "just kidding" defense.
So she can't be defended unless one identifies with her? Great game you got going. Will all the Durbin Democrats please stand up?
Well then answer the question. Do you favor poisoning Supreme Court Justices and killing Congressmen? Are you an Ann Coulter Republican?
How about you giddy? Do you favor poisoning Supreme Court Justices and killing Congressmen? Are you an Ann Coulter Republican?
Uh - we are talking about somebody who advocates killing judges, saying widows are "enjoying their husband's deaths" and wishes someone would blow up the NY Times building. Are you suggesting that one could defend Bin Laden even though you don't identify with him? Unbelievable.
Again you meantion a reality. Please answer if you believe that the 9/11 widows enjoyed their husband's death? Is that the reality you believe in?
I guess one could if one was so motivated. I'm not. The pretext was that you had to identify with Coulter's view in order to be defending her on this one matter . Remember the call was to identify oneself as a Coulter Republican?
Fair enough. I think you raise a good point - I defend a lot of things I disagree with. That being said, I don't think I've ever defended this kind of vitrolic and baseless accusation. I don't understand why anyone would want to, unless you do identify with it on some level. Otherwise, there is little reason to support such frivolous and ugly thought.
I didn't say I was "just kidding",...I wasn't serious with the rhetoric that was intentioned to goad the idiot who would respond without rationale or independent thinking... Those that can utilize independent thinking know the difference of when I'm being serious or not...
