1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Issa’s Benghazi document dump exposes several Libyans working with the U.S.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by dandorotik, Oct 19, 2012.

  1. dandorotik

    dandorotik Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    3,745
    House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) compromised the identities of several Libyans working with the U.S. government and placed their lives in danger when he released reams of State Department communications Friday, according to Obama administration officials.



    Issa posted 166 pages of sensitive but unclassified State Department communications related to Libya on the committee's website afternoon as part of his effort to investigate security failures and expose contradictions in the administration's statements regarding the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi that resulted in the death of Amb. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

    "The American people deserve nothing less than a full explanation from this administration about these events, including why the repeated warnings about a worsening security situation appear to have been ignored by this administration. Americans also deserve a complete explanation about your administration's decision to accelerate a normalized presence in Libya at what now appears to be at the cost of endangering American lives," Issa and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) wrote today in a letter to President Barack Obama.

    But Issa didn't bother to retract the names of Libyan civilians and local leaders mentioned in the cables, and just as with the WikiLeaks dump of State Department cables last year, the administration says that Issa has done damage to U.S. efforts to work with those Libyans and exposed them to physical danger from the very groups that had an interest in attacking the U.S. consulate.

    "Much like WikiLeaks, when you dump a bunch of documents into the ether, there are a lot of unintended consequences," an administration official told The Cable Friday afternoon. "This does damage to the individuals because they are named, danger to security cooperation because these are militias and groups that we work with and that is now well known, and danger to the investigation, because these people could help us down the road."

    One of the cables released by Issa names a woman human rights activist who was leading a campaign against violence and was detained in Benghazi. She expressed fear for her safety to U.S. officials and criticized the Libyan government.

    "This woman is trying to raise an anti-violence campaign on her own and came to the United States for help. She isn't publicly associated with the U.S. in any other way but she's now named in this cable. It's a danger to her life," the administration official said.

    Another cable names a Benghazi port manager who is working with the United States on an infrastructure project.

    "When you're in a situation where Ansar al-Sharia is a risk to Americans, an individual like this guy, who is an innocent civilian who's trying to reopen the port and is doing so in conjunction with Americans, could be at risk now because he's publicly affiliated with America," the official said, referring to the group thought to have led the Benghazi attack.

    One cable names a local militia commander dishing dirt on the inner workings of the Libyan Interior Ministry. Another cable names a militia commander who claims to control a senior official of the Libyan armed forces. Other cables contain details of conversations between third-party governments, such as the British and the Danes, and their private interactions with the U.S., the U.N., and the Libyan governments over security issues.

    "It betrays the trust of people we are trying to maintain contact with on a regular basis, including security officials inside militias and civil society people as well," another administration official told The Cable. "It's a serious betrayal of trust for us and it hurts our ability to maintain these contacts going forward. It has the potential to physically endanger these people. They didn't sign up for that. Neither did we."

    One administration official accused Issa of doing harm to the investigation for the sake of creating negative news stories days before the final presidential debate, which will focus on foreign policy. In previous investigations, Issa has acknowledged and respected the need to protect information that could be important to completing the administration's own investigations, the official noted.

    "He's trying to gather all the facts, but he's blurting out all the evidence before the State Department and FBI investigation is done," the official said.

    Frederick Hill, a spokesman for the Oversight Committee, defended the release of the documents in a Friday afternoon interview with The Cable. He said some of the documents had been released by the committee after the Oct. 10 hearing Issa held with State Department officials and the State Department has not directly complained to the committee so far.

    Hill said it was the administration that had endangered lives by failing to put adequate security measures in place before the attack.

    "Certainly there are people who made reckless decisions and put lives in danger in this situation and these people have motivations to discredit efforts to hold them accountable rather than having their true motivations be the security of people on the ground," he said.

    The administration failed to protect sensitive information when it fled the compound during the attack, so its complaints about Issa's release are hypocritical, Hill argued.

    "This is the administration that had all sorts of information sitting around the consulate. Where was their outrage and urgency when all that was happening?" he said.

    Hill discounted the administration's official's assertion that the public outing of U.S. government sources and contacts on the ground in Libya places those people in any danger.

    "None of these folks would seem to be surprising folks to be talking to U.S. officials considering the organizations they represent and the types of activities they were involved in," he said.

    The Cable pointed out that even WikiLeaks had approached the State Department and offered to negotiate retractions of sensitive information before releasing their cables. Hill confirmed that Issa did not grant the State Department that opportunity but said it was the State Department's fault for not releasing the documents when they were first requested.

    "We gave them the opportunity to have them present us with documents and have them tell us at that time what they were concerned about," he said.

    Committee ranking Democrat Elijah Cummings (D-MD) responded to Issa's letter late Thursday, writing that Issa's letter "completely ignores sworn testimony provided to the Committee, recklessly omits contradictory information from the very same documents it quotes, irresponsibly promotes inaccurate information, and makes numerous allegations with no evidence to substantiate them."

    UPDATE: A senior State Department official wrote in to The Cable to contest Hill's assertion the State Department had an opportunity to work with the committee to identity sensitive information in the documents before they were released by Issa.

    "Many of the documents the committee posted weren't provided by State. So there wasn't any discussion about their sensitivity prior to the committee revealing them for all to see," the official said. "Had State been given that opportunity, we'd have taken it and pointed out what documents needed to be handled with extreme care so as not to endanger anyone."

    http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/p...p_exposes_several_libyans_working_with_the_us
     
  2. FranchiseBlade

    FranchiseBlade Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    42,497
    Likes Received:
    9,823
    What a d**k. Why jeopardize the U.S. security effort in an attempt to play 'gotcha' with something that has very little real import?
     
  3. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,033
    Likes Received:
    300
    These idiots also exposed a CIA base in Libya. Just so consumed with trying to find anything to hurt the President that they don't care about what other damage they do.


    What is it with Republicans and always compromising the CIA?
     
  4. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    280
    While that article is intriguing, my understanding from other articles is that said base frankly really wasn't a secret - most people in Benghazi were aware of it. Furthermore, as detailed from my report on the Benghazi, Chaffetz was concerned about the State Department revealing that information publicly that he slipped. An accident at best, and to declare that a proper examination of what occurred in Benghazi = equals idiots consumed with trying to find anything to hurt the President is intellectually dishonest.
     
  5. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,999
    Likes Received:
    1,317
    I don't think this is unprecedented enough to be peeved about.
     
  6. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,033
    Likes Received:
    300
    If their only concern was a proper examination, they could have done it closed door instead of on C-SPAN with cameras rolling.
     
  7. Mathloom

    Mathloom Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    14,433
    Likes Received:
    9,328
    Yes, it's terrible. They may be put on trial for treason in Libya.
     
  8. pahiyas

    pahiyas Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,201
    Likes Received:
    432
    Mr. Hill, it's now the age of the interwebs :grin: I suspect most sensitive documents are on the cloud.

    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/10/198791.htm#.UHmUMQQjpX0.twitter

    "QUESTION: Hi, thanks for doing this. The timeline here begins around 8:30 p.m., but we had heard in response to some reports where reporters had found paperwork documents on the grounds of the compound that secure materials, that confidential paperwork had actually been secured earlier in the day, therefore there wasn’t any compromised material found at the compound. When did that occur? At 8:30 at night? When were those documents secured or shredded or burned or whatever?

    SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Because of the – this was a post and not a – and we – this post held no classified documents. They had computer communications with Washington, but the material would arrive on the screen and you would read it on the screen, and then that was it. There was no classified paper, so there was no paper to burn."
     
  9. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    8,395
    Issa is the same f***hole who appeared on Maher about a week ago just screaming and frothing at the mouth about Libya.

    I hope he went ahead and cashed Romney's check.
     
  10. B-Bob

    B-Bob my celli weighs a ton
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    29,296
    Likes Received:
    20,345
    Yeah, it's really funny. Issa never gave a crap about the previous attacks on our embassies. Not a peep.

    His name will be the crapper of history since he has long been the staunchest denier of global warming / climate change. He is just completely in the pocket of whatever winger group writes him the biggest check. Just an embarrassment with a room-temp IQ.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now