is there a reconciliatory christian view towards science?

This is your first post on this subject in this thread:

This places all the burden on other posters to go off and guess what you are trying to say. That, by itself, is a really stupid way to try and make a point and, in all honesty, really should have led everyone to just ignore that post entirely.

A pity I didn't.

Regardless, when pushed (by me) to help others figure out what the heck you are talking (and so pissed) about, you provide a juvenile retort and urge people to just go off and somehow garner the wisdom of grizzled by blindly clicking links.

But I tried anyhow. Unforunately, your links were terrible, and most of them refuted your own viewpoint. But I cannot say that for certain, because I still don't really know what you are talking about - you've refused to divulge any commentary. Objectively, this leads me to conclude that you have really nothing of any intellectual or philosophical merit to add, or your points are reasonably well covered (and debunked) by the aforementioned links. Bizarrely, now you're complaining to me about "taking responsibility" for "baseless assumptions"?

Look in the mirror, pal.

 

To answer the OP- yes, I think so

 

No, Rhad. It was clearly indicated to you that there was a history behind the exchange between LSD and me. You chose to jump in and make assumptions about what it we were talking about. That's YOUR responsibility and nobody else's.

You don't even know what my viewpoint is. You don't even know what the issue is, nor have you made any real attempt to find out. What on earth has happened to you??

 

Hmm... well this is all I got left:

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts dont do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

I'm still waiting...

 

Awesome. So in any particular thread, it's the burden of every poster to go off and research all previous commentary as regards the subject in question?

Please refer to this rule or show in detail how it is the commonly accepted method of dialogue in this forum. I promise you it is not, but I'll apply some grizzled logic and place the burden on you to understand and research this yourself. Until then, please refrain from posting on this further.

If you feel so goddam righteous about this, would it have hurt that hard to re-explain it to me instead of making me spend 30 minutes searching for the appropriate thread? I made no assumptions. I asked you for information. You refused and acted like a jerk.

Part of having something to say, grizzled, is actually saying it to those who are interested.

Because you won't ****ing tell me!

I've done everything you asked. I looked at your links and commented. I've asked you repeatedly to explain it to me or just comment on it. I'm not going to guess which one of the last 30,000 evolution threads with you and Louis in it pertains to this topic. That you would even think I'd do this is insane. What has happened to you? Since when has this forum ever operated under the ludicrous requirement that every poster read every post and somehow remember and catalog this information perfectly? It's hard enough for me to search and find posts of my own that I'm looking for.

Frankly, it seems like you're looking for a way out. I would be too if I made myself look half as silly as you have done to yourself in this thread.

 

Give me a break! You asked a highly ambiguous one line question, to which I replied that I didn’t understand you question and tried to respond to a couple of possible meanings, to which you responded with another one line statement. You were trying to understand, were you?? Let me say one thing very clearly to you now.

F***-OFF

If you decide to act like an adult and apologise for your sorry theatrics here, and you decide you really want to discuss an issue, which you would have to pick because the issue here was about LSD’s games and refusal to deal with facts, then I would be happy to, because unlike LSD I know you have the ability to participate in a reasoned discussion. Your choice. I'm out for the day.

 

rhad-

I have never discussed falsifiability with Grizzled in previous evolution-related threads. I have no idea what his position is either.

 

See what happens when you don't have religion in your life.

 

I guess it was very obvious anyway that you are a liar, but thanks for proving it beyond any doubt. http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=165598&page=9&pp=20

 

The OP may find the following book:

Monkey Trials and Gorilla Sermons: Evolution and Christianity from Darwin to Intelligent Design (New Histories of Science, Technology, and Medicine) interesting.

 

I fail to see a discussion on falsifiability in that thread.

 

Spiritual people aren't supposed to get angry. When I get angry I'm not being very spiritual.