1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is Morey's package for Denver better than the Knicks' or Nets'?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Carl Herrera, Aug 18, 2010.

  1. mi0304

    mi0304 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    5
    Bud + Jeffries + Hill would be better than Curry + Gallinali.
     
  2. thetatomatis

    thetatomatis Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    Messages:
    5,699
    Likes Received:
    101
    Our Knicks picks and Budinger alone would be better than anything the Knicks have to offer. They have the least to offer. I think that is obvious.
     
  3. STR8Thugg

    STR8Thugg STR8Thugg Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,866
    Likes Received:
    7,091
    They wont offer Favors... :rolleyes:
     
  4. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Knicks can offer Gallo+Randolph on December 15. Both are higher ceiling guys than anything Rockets have.
     
  5. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,487
    Likes Received:
    19,588
    both are expiring after this season. Restricted free agents and Randolph has said he wants more money.
     
  6. Francis3422

    Francis3422 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    8,900
    Likes Received:
    7,089
    I think that Budinger+Brooks+2 draft picks is better than Gallo and Randolph. Plus, Denver ensures those picks (if they end up bein the ones from NY) stay crappy (unless NY pulls someone else in).


    The bottom line is that Carmelo is a superstar. He is 26 years old. We are going to absolutely pay out the ass for him if we want him. But, if he honestly wants to come here, we need to make i happen.

    I would even do Brooks/Budinger/Patterson+2 picks.
     
  7. AKRocketsFan

    AKRocketsFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    7
    Carmelo is game changer like someone already posted he did will Syracuse to A Championship as a freshman. But he needs the right pieces around.

    So what is he worth, I have no idea. I would love him on this team without having to lose any core pieces.
    Losing C-Bud would suck but that's one person I guess would be expendable. But we have to preserve are team chemistry.
     
  8. AKRocketsFan

    AKRocketsFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    7
    I just don't think Denvers getting much for Melo they are in the same boat as The raptors last season. We see what they got. So to think that people will be paying a kings ransom for him is absurd. I say theyll be lucky if they get a decent starter. Best bet they get some bench guys with "potential"and picks.

    Bottom Line there in a bad situation. One they didn't want to be in that's for sure.
     
  9. Codman

    Codman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    11,954
    I think I could welcome Melo if he bought into the team mode that the Rockets have built. No longer do we have a team dependent on a one-two punch. If he understands that he can't jack up the shots he took in Denver, I would be okay with him being on the team, even if he has a history of legal problems. I don't give a dayum.

    Now if we're giving up Aaron or Luis, I will be pissed. It will be sad to see Shane or Chase go, but not as much as AB and Scola. Shane can play anywhere as a true professional, but I love having him on our team, especially in the crunch.

    Chase is a tremendous talent, but the NBA is a business and he's a hot commodity right now for most teams. A shooter with hops, defense and "coachability"
     
  10. OkayAyeReloaded

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,893
    Likes Received:
    7,349
    Well thought out, reasonable trade.

    I don't know if it is a foregone conclusion they will have to rebuild though. I you get a 20 ppg scorer (and other things from us presumably) and have Harrington they could probably still contend for a playoff spot (maybe 5-8 seed instead of 1-4 seed they were competing for before their coach had his unfortunate situation develop), and could still have pieces to trade (like Billups later) and stay competitive for a few years. The big part will be their coach's health influencing that team's success and intangibles I think.

    As far as SF, I agree with you they aren't lacking for a starter now that you mentioned Harrington. But he is 30 and I don't know if they have a back up SF that is young and has talent like Buddinger.

    I agree with NJ having to gut their team to get melo and melo not wanting to play for a team that might not contend for a few years. They had the worst record in the league last year and despite new ownership and head coach, young talent still has to develop (and prove it's not a bust) and they will have some years to go before seriously contending for a title (if at all). Chris Paul is a looming specter in all this though (But I think the Denver organization will look out for itself first and take the best offer).

    I looked at your idea and including that offer, I don't know if NY has anything better talent wise than what we can offer. Good players on bad teams can be iffy sometimes (not always though). I would say they do have some pieces.

    Really this might just be nothing but rumors and gossip, but I think either Houston trade option might be a reasonable idea (and perhaps the best offer) for Denver's point of view.
     
  11. thetatomatis

    thetatomatis Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    Messages:
    5,699
    Likes Received:
    101
    They want picks, youth and some performers. We got all bases covered and none of the other teams do. They need a scorer back? Brooks or Martin. Two 20 points a game guy. Something niether other team offers and both are already near star level players(upside not needed and already included), Patterson (upside if they want and young), Knicks pucks which the Knicks by the way dont have(If they did wouldnt be as valuable from New Jersey or New York because Carmello would be there lessening the value, Therefore our Knicks picks are most valuable, expirings Battier, Brooks dual value, and Jeffries. Youth? Budinger, Brooks, Patterson. We could go every which way they want any variation and not hurt our roster enough to be less of a team than either the Knicks or Nets in any move. There is no way around it. We are by FAR the best team in this. In every single column.
     
  12. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    After reading the Nuggets board, I think I am a little more clear on thier position.

    My proposal:

    Trade One:

    Trevor Ariza TPE

    for

    Chris Andersen (4.5m)


    Trade Two:

    Carmello Anthony (17.15m)

    for

    Jared Jeffries (6.8m x 1.15 (kicker) = 7.91m)
    Jordan Hill (2.67m)
    Chase Budinger (.78m)
    Chuck Hayes (1.97m)
    Jermaine Taylor (.78m)
    3 Million Cash
    Both NY Picks

    Total = 14.11m


    Nuggets save 7.5m immediatley and 15m with tax implications. They get Hill, Bud, Taylor and 2 potential lottery picks to start rebuilding. Hayes is probably not a rebuilding piece per say, but is a great influence on the youngsters. They dump 35 yr old Andersens long term deal in the process. They would still be about 5 million over the tax line, but could probably give away Smith at the dealine to escape the penalty. They would have a core of Lawson, Afflalo, Budinger, Hill, Taylor and 2 lottery picks to build on.

    Alternatively, instead of Hayes, the Rockets could give up Patterson if its not enough.

    Rockets would roll with:

    Brooks / Lowry
    Martin / Lee
    Melo / Battier
    Scola / Patterson
    Yao / Birdman / Miller

    Contender lineup I believe. Birdman offers up the size and defensive big we have been missing. Melo gives us a difference maker. We would have an offensive and defensive specialist at every position....
     
    #152 larsv8, Aug 18, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2010
    1 person likes this.
  13. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,961
    Likes Received:
    11,101
    i disagree...like i said we'd have to get denver to buyout battier and hayes and we'd resign them.

    completely random trade but

    billups/lowry
    martin/lee
    melo/battier/balkman
    scola/hayes/patterson
    yao/miller/hayes/birdman

    pretty damn solid team imo. starter scoring is better than any team in the league and has 4 guys that get to the line non-stop and shoot a very FT%. bench is solid d but complete lack of scoring.
     
  14. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,438
    Likes Received:
    11,586
    I just can't see how it would be enough without including AB or Martin, unless as you seem to indicate that if they rebuild they are just looking to dump salary. Without Melo a contract like Birdman is pardon the pun an albatross so it makes sense toget rid of it from Denver's point of view as well as accept it as a poison pill from the Rocks.

    I really really hope that this would be the case.
     
  15. Charles Jones

    Charles Jones Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    781
    Likes Received:
    65
    trade battier, taylor, patterson and jefferies...picks and cash are always nice too Denver without melo has to start rebuilding...with Lawson JR Smith Taylor Patterson and a bunch of picks they are on their way

    do everything u can to get melo imagen melo in RA system he already has those back cuts down and with Scola and Yao our frontline becomes one of the best in the league hands down


    NBA Champs Line-up :eek:
    Brooks/Lowry
    Martin/Lee
    Melo/Bud
    Scola/Hill
    Yao/Miller
     
  16. spookyoldtree

    spookyoldtree Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    15
    With this line-up, who is gonna play defense except Yao?
     
  17. ASidd_1990

    ASidd_1990 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,732
    Likes Received:
    87
    realistically, this is what Denver would want. One of Brooks or Martin, my hunch is they would want Brooks because he is cheaper.

    This is assuming that the SI report is true and he would sign a multiyear deal with us:

    Brooks
    Budinger
    Harris
    Hill
    Jeffries
    Johnson
    Patterson
    NY 2012 Pick

    for

    Anthony
    Anderson ( 4.5 million of Ariza trade exception)


    Lowry/Lee/Smith
    Martin/Taylor
    Melo/Battier
    Scola/Anderson
    Yao/Miller

    or if they want back Martin in the scenario:

    Martin
    Budinger
    Hill
    Jeffries
    Patterson
    Harris
    Johnson
    NY 2012 Pick

    for

    Anthony
    Smith
    Anderson ( use 4.5 million of Ariza trade exception)


    Brooks/Lowry
    Lee/Smith
    Melo/Battier
    Scola/Anderson
    Yao/Miller

    I don't think New York, Orlando, or New Jersey can beat that.
     
  18. shaggylambda

    shaggylambda Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    1,732
    Likes Received:
    47
    Wouldn't it be IRONIC if we were able to trade for Melo using the Knicks pick. NY fans will be hella pissed.
     
  19. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    4,885

    If Denver and Anthony would both agree to that deal I'm sure the Rockets would be asking "Where do we sign".
     
  20. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    I sitll think any package with D. Favors is the most appetizing package out there. I do wonder, however, if NJ is willing to give him up along with probably picks and other players (which would be needed for salary matching if nothing else) given that they are really still rebuilding. Also, I wonder if a further depleted NJ roster (or NY roster) is appealing to Carmelo even if it means he gets to go play in NYC.

    I think the Rockets have the advantage that (a) they dangle quite a package for Carmelo while still retain considerable talent around him, (b) part of that package are NY's picks, the value of which actually goes up, not down, if Carmelo is traded to Houston and signs long-term.

    It's nice to have other team's picks in such scenarios... typically if you are offering your own picks for a good player, your pick's value goes down because of the acquisition of the good player. Not so if you are trading someone else's picks.
     

Share This Page