That's right; anybody who isn't impressed by a dumpy ass and cellulite thighs, coupled with a pancake flat chest is clearly queer as steer.
Hey different strokes for different folks. I am glad that a lot of men consider any woman weighing a quarter ounce more than Mary-Kate Olsen as disgustingly fat. It makes for less competition for me.
I never said one had to be impressed or ga-ga over her. Hell, I'm not. But if a male honestly thinks she is too fat, then I'm inclined to believe they don't really like women.
I get it, you like flat chests. Any male that is impressed with boobless wonders like clarkson = gehy. Making generalizations because people aren't impressed by a pear shaped celebrity = lame.
Nice twisting there. I never said one thing about her breasts or that anyone should be impressed with her. I took issue with people calling her fat. Beauty is subjective and say what you will about anything else, but this notion that she is a porker is preposterous!
Well, she's said that she is 5'4" and 125lbs. If she's honest about that then her BMI is 21.5 and within normal range. Even if she was fibbing a bit she would be in normal range. She's got some thunder thighs though. Gives her a pear shape, which isn't good.
I never said that. I said that guys that think women with her body type are too fat are in the closet. But upon further examination, probably a good portion of that sample are just trying to sound cool and would really bang her in a heartbeat if given the chance.
I hear you bro you are correct - below I attach some fwappage material for red blooded heteros such as yourself.
How is this not saying they're gay? She may not be fat based on BMI, but she's too fat for me. And no, I wouldn't bone her if given the chance... famous or no. You can have meat on your body and be attractive too. Look at Beyonce. Kelly Clarkson does not wear her big bonedness well.
OK mate, There are too many counties in Texas that could relate to what you just said here, but I don't think you would want to visit them. Cheers