Show me one picture of Eva Longoria in which her gut is protruding or her back fat is jiggling. Everybody can take a bad picture, that's not the issue, I've jsut never ever seen Clarkson look good except for in a heavily chopped/brushed still photo. Every time I see her on TV or in a non-staged photo she looks fatter and not especially attractive than in her publicity photos. That image only exists in photoshop/publicity photo fantasy. But anyway, yeah I would not be surprised if a lot of the BBS has dated a girl who, if properly airbrushed, made up, and photographed from the right angle as to exclude her negative aspects (such as Ms. Clarkson's beer gut - where is it in this picture? Mercifully out of the frame) - could resemble this. Maybe everybody should run out and have their girlfriends do glamourshots in order to prove to you that this is true?
In the universe of celebrities who make their living on their sex appeal, she is fat. In the universe of normal people, she is normal. But don't tell me I couldn't date a normal looking woman. sh-t I almost exclusively date them.
Yet, many people believe she's hot. But she's not in the normal world, so no, you couldn't date her. Therefore, I laugh at the internet geeks calling her ugly.
Apparently not, look at the poll results; that's why you're making it an issue. Well yeah, she also lives in a different city and may in fact have a boyfriend or a husband or whatever; those are other reasons why I couldn't date her. How is this relevant to what I or anybody else thinks about her looks, which happen to not be substantially above or better than most folks in my (or others) spheres? Therefore I laugh at you for thinking that her celebrity somehow renders her more visually attractive, Mr. Tesh. That's like me saying "RM95, sure you might think Bill O'Reilly's a loudmouthed idiot, but you have no place to argue with his political views because he's famous and on TV and wouldn't give you the time of day, therefore your dissent with his opinion is laughable".
Kelly Clarkson cleans up NICE. Would hit. Still a high percentage of not-hot pics of her out there. And I actually like her singles. Maybe that's why I think she's hot.
Good point. I follow Kelly Clarkson NOW, but not American Idol. Only the first three weeks of Simon being an *sshol* are good to watch.
Clay Aiken is the male version of Kelly. At least normal Kelly (average) being female could get laid. Normal Clay (dork) would have to buy a hooker. Celeb Clay is considered by females to be hot. Another American Idol transformation.
Uh, the poll results indicate that Kelly Clarkson is not ugly. And she is most definitely not. RM95, I agree with you on all points. Especially laughing at all the internet geeks calling her ugly.
She might be not ugly, but she's definitely not good looking. Especially for a celebrity. She's probably cute at times in real life and like a real life girl her weight looks to fluctuate a good 20 pounds constantly. She's an above average girl and an average celebrity. I don't know why people think that people who use the Internet alot (and who freaking doesn't now adays) can't be good looking or have good looking boy/girlfriends. That's idiotic.
Ugly is too strong. But she is also not super good looking. She just aint. She is an average looking girl who can look a lot better with makeup etc. She obviously can look good enough. On the first season of American Idol they showed clips of her at Austin, before she was famous, hanging out with friends etc. I think many on this board could of got with her then. But probably not now. But she does seem pretty cool so who knows.
Uh, the poll results indicate that 57 % think she is not ugly. (while 43% do). It doesn't indicate that the consensus opinion is that she is "hot", which I imagine is somewhere south of not ugly.
