1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is Battier a better player now than he was when we traded for him?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Bob Sacamano, Sep 23, 2009.

?

Is he better or worse?

  1. Better. He's improved since coming to Houston.

    113 vote(s)
    69.3%
  2. Worse. He's declined since coming to Houston.

    50 vote(s)
    30.7%
  1. Melechesh

    Melechesh Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,446
    Likes Received:
    16
    If we hadn't given up a freakin lotto pick for him, I would have nothing but good to say about him.
     
  2. Artesticles

    Artesticles Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    13
    What's there to fight about? You've already LOST with this post ^
     
  3. Bob Sacamano

    Bob Sacamano Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ah, the "value to a contending team" canard...like Battier has this vast wealth of experience winning in the playoffs...

    14 of the 30 current starters at small forward have won multiple playoff series in their career. Battier is not one of those 14. How about we wait until he actually wins something before declaring him the ultimate "winner"?

    Here are Battier's playoff plus/minus numbers (per 100 possessions) for each of his 3 seasons with the Rockets. His ranking among the 16 starting SF's is in parentheses.

    2006/2007: -6.8 (15th)
    2007/2008: -12.6 (12th)*
    2008/2009: -4.0 (13th)

    Value to a contending team indeed...and before you start with the "but Battier brings more than what shows up in the box score", remember, plus/minus has nothing to do with how many points you score, how many rebounds you collect, etc. It simply looks at your team's performance with you on the court, compared with your team's performance without you on the court.

    *It never ceases to amaze me that Battier played 246 minutes in that season's playoffs, and managed to record a grand total of 3 assists. That's absolutely unreal. Zach Randolph thinks that's ridiculous.
     
  4. HI Mana

    HI Mana Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,419
    Likes Received:
    1,057
    As said previously, there need to be an "about the same" option here. There is little doubt that playing the way Battier does, in taking charges, scrapping for loose balls and playing a ton of minutes while doing it, has taken a toll on his physical skills, and subsequently, his offensive repertoire. I feel that on Memphis, he was far more of a jack of all trades kind of player, perhaps Bobby Simmons's first year in Milwaukee. Under Jeff Van Gundy, he took the strongest parts of his game and exclusively focused on them; making him a specialist, rather than a well-rounded player. Does that equal better?

    There is little doubt that he's a more cerebral defender now than when he had better athleticism; you can take a look at his foul rate to see that it's improved quite a bit from his younger days. I believe that in baseball, most pitchers say you reach your physical prime in your mid 20s, but don't really learn how to pitch effectively (knowing the umpires, controlling the tempo of the game, "fooling hitters") until your early 30s. Battier seems to be the same way with his defense; so often now you see him giving guys a shot that has been deemed "inefficient" by the Morey Bible; rather than aggressively pressure them into making a mistake, like Artest used to do. Artest was like a former pitcher with a 98mph heater which he used to intimidate hitters, only age made that ball fly at 94, and he more and more frequently got burned. Battier was they journeyman pitcher who decided to instead pitch to contact, keep the ball in the park, and scrape out quality starts; not pretty, but his team has a good record in games he starts.

    I believe that he's also become a more effective leader in Houston as he's aged.

    Does this all excuse his very minimal contributions on the offensive end? If he has another year like 2009, then I doubt it. But if he returns to being a 3-4 Win Share guy next year on offense, as he's been throughout his career, then I think you' be hard pressed to call it a decline based on how experience has improved his particular craft. If he repeats last year's numbers? I might have to see if there's room on the "dump Battier for a bag of basketballs" bandwagon that's rolling on through lately.
     
  5. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    HI Mana, I really like the analogy you used and it backs up what I've said. In memphis, shane scored 30% of his points from 3, 30% from the ft line and about 30% around the goal and inside the arc. Now, about 70% of his points come frm 3s because 70% of his shots come from there. Its called being multiple and getting better. What I appreciiate about scola is he takes advantage of the attention from Tracy and Yao. That's why he shoots such a high % and teams actually respect him when he's on the offensive end. Kenny smith once said that in sacramento it was the hardest 17 ppg he ever had to get and in houston was the easiest 13ppg he ever scored. Is it against the laws or rules of basketball to make yourself effective even at 30? I mean if you just perrform basic basketball in adelmans system, you can get easy points and make the defense guard you.

    Maybe Bob shouldve put a option of about the same, but my college coach always said either you're getting better or you're getting worse. I think bob chose good options, its really that simple.
     
  6. orbb

    orbb Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    16
    He doesn't have one. Even his hook is painful to watch. For me as a true rocket fan, I'm grading Morey's off-season on if Battier is traded or not. Its time to cut the deadweight, stop the BS about how much heart he has, ad get someone who can actually play.

    I want someone who can knock down 50% of the most open 3's in the history of the NBA.
     
  7. brantonli24

    brantonli24 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,236
    Likes Received:
    68
    The public perception of his has gone up, since he has far more exposure as a Rocket than as a Grizzly, so in the public eye, he's a better player.

    In actual basketball terms, he's pretty much the same.
     
  8. Landry92

    Landry92 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    12
    I think hes defense and mentality and leadership got better
    but he became more hesitant and less confident on offense ..
     
  9. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,832
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    I'm a Battier guy. That said, where will his minutes come from this season? Would it not make sense for both teams to trade (virtually) identical contracts, Barbosa for Shane?
     
  10. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,137
    Likes Received:
    14,947
    Shane's value increases exponentially in proportion to how good his team is. When every trip down the floor is important ....that's when he shines.
    That said,he's lost a little bit,but is still a KEY component for a title team.
     
  11. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,963
    Likes Received:
    39,422
    Shane was a lotto pick himself.

    DD
     
  12. Bob Sacamano

    Bob Sacamano Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    13
    ...except Artest's "record" last year was better than Battier's. During the regular season, Artest's plus/minus per 100 possessions was +6.8, Battier's was +3.9. During the playoffs, the difference was even more pronounced: Artest was +3.9, while Battier dropped all the way to -4.0.

    Again, I'm not talking about box scores and individual statistics here, I'm simply looking at how the team performed with Artest on the floor, compared to how we performed with Battier on the floor.

    Really, your journeyman pitcher analogy is pretty much backwards, judging by Battier and Artest's plus/minuses for the last 5 seasons or so.

    Battier -
    2004/2005: +11.6
    2005/2006: +10.4
    2006/2007: +4.2
    2007/2008: +4.3
    2008/2009: +3.9

    Artest -
    2004/2005: +5.8
    2005/2006: +9.8
    2006/2007: +7.4
    2007/2008: +9.1
    2008/2009: +6.8

    So there's a pretty striking trend when you look at Battier's production. If you look at plus/minus on defense only, you see a similar trend (a negative sign is good, it means the team's points allowed went down with that player in the game)

    Battier -
    2004/2005: -6.1
    2005/2006: -7.0
    2006/2007: -3.7
    2007/2008: -0.9
    2008/2009: -1.6

    Artest -
    2004/2005: -4.6
    2005/2006: -6.0
    2006/2007: -1.5
    2007/2008: -4.3
    2008/2009: -4.7

    So which is the guy who's lost his "stuff" and is now getting burned more and more frequently? And which is the guy who's "learned how to pitch" and maintained a similar level of performance despite his athleticism?
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. LBJ-Tmac

    LBJ-Tmac Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    13
    Sorry for inconvience but how do I search for past threads?
    Thanks
     
  14. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    which is laughable of how bad that draft was. Probably the worse draft class since 86. When Mike Miller was rookie of the year and probably has had the best career, that says a lot.
     
  15. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Battier was a #6 pick in 2001. Here are all the #6 picks over the last 10 drafts:

    2000 - DerMarr Johnson
    2001 - Shane Battier
    2002 - Dejuan Wagner
    2003 - Chris Kaman
    2004 - Josh Childress
    2005 - Martell Webster
    2006 - Brandon Roy
    2007 - Yi Jianlian
    2008 - Danilo Galinari
    2009 - Jonny Flynn

    When its all said and done for these 10 players, how will we rank their careers?
     
  16. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Google with site:bbs.clutchfans.net at the end.

    Or become a Contributing Member by donating money.
     
  17. spaceage808

    spaceage808 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    696
    Likes Received:
    18
    i like me some shane battier as much as the next guy. but i fail to understand how people can think he is a better player now. the evidence is there. unless he has found the fountain of youth, very few players are much better after 5 years (unless they came in the league very young). battier's abilities and strengths require him to maintain a level of athleticism to guard other teams wings.

    his offensive game has not improved, perhaps this is due to him deferring too much to the star players on the team. i think the level of fanboyism for battier is at an all time high. I would think that if the league thought so highly of him as well, there should be more talks of impdending trades from "contenders" that require his services. either we think too highly of him or the league thinks too lowly of him.

    2 cents
     
  18. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Battier's strengths include his preparation, his mental approach to the game, his understanding of what the other team is trying to do. Those things can definitely improve with experience and more resources (which the Rockets staff provide him).
     
  19. Bob Sacamano

    Bob Sacamano Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    13
    I thought he was already the smartest, best prepared, most winnerest player in the league. Does he have any room to improve his intangibles? I'm a lot more concerned with whether he can improve his tangibles, or at least stop them from declining. Unfortunately, based on the evidence of the last 5 seasons, plus the age factor, that doesn't seem all that likely.
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. cjtaylorpt

    cjtaylorpt Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    210
    He is about the same but much more valuable to a contending team now than he ever was.
     

Share This Page