1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is a Big 3 really needed?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Rileydog, Jun 21, 2013.

  1. TheresTheDagger

    Joined:
    May 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,110
    Likes Received:
    7,766
    Ya in their old man years. Don't forget, they took the Jazz to game 6 of the WCF in probably their last real year of being competitive.
     
  2. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,665
    Both of those big 3's featured players on the decline.
     
  3. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    I think a 2.5 formula works just fine - which considering Bosh's performance this season, is really what Miami had. And what the Spurs had. I would consider a Harden + Howard + Parsons crew to be a 2.5 mix. I do think that at a minimum you need 2 true stars to contend, which we don't have yet.

    I think the real question is what sort of supporting cast you can build around your stars. I like the idea of adding just Howard because it saves our flexibility and allows us to keep quality players like Lin, Asik, Beverly, etc. I will take 2 or 2.5 stars plus quality role players and backups over 3 stars and a bunch of scrubs any day.

    The Spurs have used this formula for awhile now and I think it's hard to argue that it hasn't been successful. The result of this year's playoffs was one crappy Manu game away from being different.
     
  4. Duffy Pratt

    Duffy Pratt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    3
    Well, this year LA had a big four with Kobe, Dwight, Pau, and Nash. As I recall, that team was supposed to be unbeatable. Chemistry matters. It's a team game. If you have the right components, you don't even need a big one (witness Detroit). Or you can do it with one guy playing out of his mind (Hakeem, Dirk).

    Bosh looks bad on the Heat because they've put him out of position, and turned him into a passive jump shooter. Neither LeBron nor Wade are particularly good at running the pick and roll, and LeBron doesn't function so well if there's a guy in the post clogging the middle. So Bosh is doing a pretty good job as a terrible fit in the Miami system. And I don't think it's fair to complain that Bosh couldn't handle Duncan one on one. Look at the Memphis series: Gasol is the defensive player of the year. He's younger, bigger and stronger than Duncan, and he couldn't handle Duncan either. I don't think there's anyone in the league who can deal with Duncan's post game one on one, even at 37.
     
  5. nomangame

    nomangame Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    4
    We can form our own Big 3 with Harden, Parsons and Lin.

    Heck, we'll have an all-star starting 5 with Asik transforming into the league's top 5 centres and Jones fully developing his skill set.
     
  6. Cstyle42

    Cstyle42 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,647
    Likes Received:
    14,191
    Your joking...
     
  7. Rip Van Rocket

    Rip Van Rocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    356
    I think he is, but you can never be too sure.
     
  8. cjtaylorpt

    cjtaylorpt Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    210
    Why have 3 when you can have Lin?
     
  9. HOUSTONJS

    HOUSTONJS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    18
    What about if we had 3 Lins?
     
  10. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    Obviously, we wouldn't need Jeremy anymore and could trade him for Chris Paul.
     

Share This Page