...and you are an extremely biased person. You didn't even denounce the action but merely equated it with everyday goings on in countries around the world.
Good lord, Creepy. Honestly, I think you need therapy, in a hurry. Your response is one of the sickest things I've read on this board in years. Keep D&D Civil.
He's just retreating back into the relative safehaven of Iranian progressiveness after being exposed with his Ranger MacBeth debacle.
I haven't even read that thread, Hayes. Guess I'll have to, to see what's up. I just can't fathom a reaction like that to TracyMcCrazyeye's post. (welcome to D&D, TracyMc!) He could have posted that there was a lack of evidence (I'm assuming the story is true... sometimes these stories aren't), or something of that nature. To respond in the fashion he chose is just sick. If the story is for real, can you imagine going through what the young woman went through, and then getting a medieval judgement like this from the theocratic bastards who run Iran? I'm agnostic, but if there is a god, god help the people of Iran. They are living a nightmare. Keep D&D Civil.
I didn't do the interview so I wasn't responsible for anything other than posting it...kinda like that fake photo you used as evidence in the immigration thread. I don't know what you're talking about...If executing people is a medieval judgement, then the US is right up there....the US up until recently (last year I believe) used to sentence minors to death as well...Again, I don't see the relevance of the article.
Hardly, lol. First, that photo was never shown to be false. Second, that photo was merely an illustration of sentiment which I was discussing - not evidence of anything. Third, you've started a thread and made declarations about what you 'want to see' based wholly on a fabricated premise, fully supporting that premise and been convincingly busted for it. It's not even 'kinda like' the same thing.
You were using that fake photo as evidence in order to demonstrate a point you were trying to make just like you use other people's opinions as evidence. I made statements about what the guy was saying...nothing more nothing less. But your spin is something I've gotten used to, especially since you advocated that all women walk around topless and then turned right around and called me sexist.
Right, right. Your thread wasn't about the 'facts' but about the 'fact that he said those things,' lol. Sure, buddy. Try the old distraction ploy, lol. I didn't advocate all women walk around topless, nor is that necessarily sexist. You, however, are clearly a sexist. You're on record as saying you don't apply the same standards to men as you do to women because they are women and you are a 'chick magnet' (pretty much the definition of a sexist, loser). In light of that I'm not suprised you'd try and gloss over the rape/execution story.
Yeah saying all women should walk around topless isn't sexist....that's rich...lol...Hayes I told you before that I would hook you up with some women so that you could release some of this aggression you have built up inside of you, but I can't guarantee that they would walk around topless though.
The rape execution is horrible if true, but I am left wondering what that article has to do with the thread topic? Or is it that the Iranian 'dress code' story seems to be a fabrication and therefore it's time to search the net for other Iranian misdeeds that are irrelevant to the topic (however tragic they might be)? Someone help me out here, if it's a "bash Iran however you can" thread, please change the title.
I'm reacting to what I read. I do that, lol. If the story isn't relevant to the thread (I think it is, considering that it would illustrate discrimination of the basest kind against women in Iran), TracyMcCrazyeye can hardly be blamed for not starting a thread about it. Where would you put a story like this, if you couldn't start a thread, tiger? I hope it's not true. As for a "bashing Iran thread," that's crazy. Most of the political posts here bash the United States, from someone's point of view, not Iran or any other country. Keep D&D Civil.
i don't know if some of you read my sentences before the article, but i clearly stated that i do not have the privileges to post a new thread. i thought the article was pretty interesting, and i just wanted to post it somewhere that was somewhat related. since this was the only thread that i saw that was discussing iran, i thought i'd put it here. now, i'm not trying to pinpoint iran as some horrorific country as some of you say i am, i was just trying to post and contribute to the bbs in some way. so instead of blasting it, read the words that i wrote before the article.
I didn't know the thread was called "discrimination of the basest kind against women in Iran", but OK. That part I missed, so my apologies, it would explain why an irrelevant article was posted in this thread.
Sadly, it's quite true. http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE130052006 http://save.nazanin.googlepages.com/home
What does any of this have to do with this thread, which was about a Iranian dress code that has been fabricated and disproven? This story is absolutely irrelevant. Should I start posting articles about the 6 million dead in the Congo in this thread? Or maybe I should discuss how blacks in the US make-up around 12% of the total population, but make-up over 50% of the prison population.
Buck, I have this thing about starting threads. I generally don't. Do you feel like starting one titled, "Discrimination of the basest kind against women in Iran?" Tiger seems to have a problem with it being discussed here. Keep D&D Civil.
