1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

In Speech Bush Returns to Fear Mongering as Polls Drop

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Oct 6, 2005.

  1. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,969
    Likes Received:
    39,677
    Hmm... poll numbers dropping... major speech reminding us all how much evil there is lurking out there... then...

    VOILA! NYC subway threat!

    This administration's choreography is worse than Britney's.
     
  2. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    472

    OH! Snap!
     
  3. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,615
    Likes Received:
    9,138
    you freedom hater!!!

    its called coincidence and heres some more of them...all coincidence

    January 10, 2002 – Bush gets hammered by the press over his relationship with Ken Lay. He swears he doesn’t know him. Congress starts questioning the relationship between Lay and Bush beginning February 5.

    February 12, 2002 - Attorney General John Ashcroft called on "all Americans to be on the highest state of alert" after an FBI warning of a possible imminent terrorist attack.

    or

    September 20, 2002 -- In the wake of damaging Congressional 9/11 inquiry revelations, President Bush reverses course and backs efforts by many lawmakers to form an independent commission to conduct a broader investigation than the current Congressional inquiry. The White House also refuses to turn over documents showing what Bush knew before 9/11. Relatives of 9/11 victims grill the Bush Administration over their reluctance to get to the bottom of it.

    September 24, 2002 – Ashcroft elevates the terror alert to Orange

    or

    February 6, 2003 - Powell pleads with the UN Security Council for a first strike against Iraq.

    February 9, 2003 - Citing credible threats that al Qaeda might be planning attacks on American targets, the U.S. government raised the national color-coded threat level to orange, indicating a "high" risk of a terrorist attack

    or

    July 25, 2003 -- After the Bush administration delayed its publication for months, Congress releases its 9/11 findings. The Bush Gang also deletes 28 pages of the report believed to detail Saudi funding of members of Al Qaeda in the Untied States prior to Sept. 11. Three days later, American troops are charged with beating Iraqi prisoners and 15 soldiers die over eight days of fighting.

    July 29 - Department of Homeland Security issues a warning about the possibility of suicide attacks on airplanes.

    or

    December 18, 2003 -- 9/11 Chairman Thomas Kean says the attacks were preventable. One day later a federal appeals court ruled the government can not detain U.S. citizen Jose Padilla indefinitely without filing charges against him or allowing him access to the courts. The same day The Wall Street Journal reports that auditors at the Pentagon are accusing Halliburton of refusing to hand over internal documents related to allegations that the oil service company overcharged the U.S. government in Iraq and then, to top it off, David Kay quits, having found no WMD’s.


    Dec. 21, 2003 - Ridge raises the terror threat level just in time for the holidays.

    or

    The week of March 15, 2004 -- Military families organize together to oppose the war, Democrats call for probe on Medicare cost cover-up and Condi opts out of appearing at the 9/11 Commission hearings. She repeats her refusal several times during the week, and later on appears on 60 Minutes to explain her position. Then, CNN reports that a "high target" Al Qaeda leader has been "surrounded" in the border with Pakistan. It is also suggested it may be Bin Laden or al-Zawahri. After the fighting ends, it is reported that it wasn't any "high value" target in the battle after all. Another, "Ooh! Never mind" moment.

    March 21, 2004 The State Department issues a terror alert.

    or

    On May 10, Bush’s approval rating hit 46%. A week later, Colin Powell tells Meet the Press that he was deliberately misled about WMD information. Powell's aide tries to cut him off mid-air. Newsweek reports that President Bush's top lawyer warned two years ago that Bush could be prosecuted for war crimes as a result of how his administration was fighting the war on terror. Then the White House stonewalls UN on papers about Halliburton’s contracts in Iraq and Captain Crayola testifies before 9/11 Commission and the Senate Armed Forces Committee holds hearings on Abu Ghraib abuses.

    Seven days after all this happens, Ridge warns of a major threat of a terrorist attack during the summer.

    The fact remains that Bush hasn’t a damn thing to run on except the war on terrorism. One week he’s ranting about how much safer we all are, and then a week later that al Qaeda boogeyman is coming to get us.

    Well, George, which is it? Talk about "flip-flopping!"
     
  4. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,479
    Likes Received:
    9,350
    don't you ride the subway mark? will you be this cavalier on the N train tomorrow?
     
  5. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    [​IMG]

    "Insurgency is in its last throes."
     
  6. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,479
    Likes Received:
    9,350
    with this thread, you have entered the glynch hall of formal irrelevancy.
     
  7. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    lol - is that worse than islamic jihadist sympathizer?
     
  8. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    472
    I lead a charmed life. Heading up to the country house tomorrow for an extended four day weekend. But thanks for the thoughts.
     
  9. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,479
    Likes Received:
    9,350
    too long to post here, but you should read this article from the well known neo-con organ the new yorker before you go:

    http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050725fa_fact2

    bottom line, nyc's anti-terror operation is probably far superior to, and certainly operates independently of, the federal system. this warning came from bloomberg, not bush. i'd pay attention.
     
  10. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,969
    Likes Received:
    39,677
    The intelligence came from the FBI. If memory serves me correctly, that's a federal organization, not part of the NYC mayor's office.

    Nice try, though!
     
  11. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    I can agree with some of this post. We should try to make amends - when our policies kill and destroy whole countries and hundreds of thousands of folks.

    I do not not agree on Vietnam. 2,000,000 Vietnamese were killed in a war that Ho Chi Minh,the George Washington of Vietnam would have disposed of quickly against the corrupt South easily without our involvment which prolonged the war for many years. The evils of reeducation camps etc, bad as they were, pale in comparison to the harm we did. Many of those 2,000,000 were killed by our armed forces.

    Things only got better in Vietnam once we withdrew and the fighting stopped. To have corrected the mess faster once we withdrew we should have restarted diplomatic relations, massive trade and aid asap. We could have had the present happy state of today much earlier.

    In Afghanistan we helped bankroll the Muhjadin, the Madrassah and were midwives to Al Qaeda. We liked this when they were attacking the Soviets. It is hard to know what we could have done to have prevented this, once we set it in motion. It would have been hard to get the American people to then go to war against the forces we largely created in the God forsaken country of Afghanistan.

    In Iraq, we know for sure that tens if not hundreds of thousands of Iraqis will continue to be killed by the US if we stay. We have killed hundeds of thousands to date with both wars and the sanctions. It is doubtful that if left to their devices the Iraqis will do worse. We know that they will fight us till we leave. Aside from the dittos, does anyone think the Constitution will end the resistance? Given our present fear of giving heavy weapons to our Iraqis for fear they will turn them on us, what can we do to make it better? Our policies seem to have the effect of pushing the country to civil war,which many, including the elder Bush, and Cheney and Powell in the first Bush Administration, predicted as a very possible outcome. As we arm the Kurds and Shiites to kill the Sunnis in the resistance it is doubtful that we can prevent this.

    We should withdraw. It started making things better in Vietnam and it probably will in Iraq. Though,unlikely given the GOP support for the war,even better would be to also impeach Bush as a form of apology. Waiting 3 years till his term ends just delays the process. This will help restore our international image and be a formal message that we have returned to sanity.

    Spend at least the $5 billion per month we spend on killing Iraqis indefinitely to help repay for our destruction. Let the UN or someone administer this money. Any attempt to limit rebuilding contract to Cheney's Halliburton or other US war profiteers will not be helpful.

    In Iraq even the wingnuts won't agree to basically stay and die because we made a mistake and we hope that by staying for years we can in some unknown way salvage some good from the situation. After the the Constitution passes and the resistance continues it will get old very quick.
     
  12. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    62,016
    Likes Received:
    41,615
    Invading Iraq and creating a multi year long insurgency/recruiting tool/resource drain is exactly what bin Laden wanted, I know this because I am smart.

    Therefore, bin Laden wants what you wanted more than what he wants what he said - accordingly, we are red hot and you are cold snot.
     
  13. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    I'm really not sure how we can withdraw at this point. Iraq would literally descend into fragmentation and chaos. Its somewhat unique in that it is a country that is divided into three major sects. In Vietnam, both the North and South were the same minus some political differences. In Iraq, you have a fledging government barely holding the country together. The Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis all have their differrences and any withdrawal could easily spark further fragmentation.

    The country is lawless as it is. There are virtually no Iraqi security forces that can actually do anything and the coalition is managing law enforcement in its entirety. A withdrawal would literally mean there would be absolutely no one to enforce any laws and the result would be outright chaos on a scale that we haven't seen yet. As bad as it is, it still can get worse. Also, Gaza is a pretty good indication of the reaction of various Islamic fundamentalists. They claimed victory after withdrawal and there's no reason why they wouldnt do the same after a US withdrawal. A withdrawal would just create a regional power vacuum that would probably be filled in a more fundamentalist government that would be Iran number 2.

    In short, we messed up by invading in the first place but withdrawal really isn't an option right now. Vietnam and Iraq are two different things and sadly we're stuck here for a few more years.
     
  14. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    Why don't you just speak your mind unambiguously? :D
     
  15. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    Can you please extrapolate on this claim? Are we going to resume bombing? Are insurgents in your body count?

    Et cetera
     
  16. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Giddy, we bomb on probably a daily basis. I don't thing this a news worthy event any more. Yes, Giddy, the insurgents are included.. They are Iraqis and human beings who were not insurgents till we invaded their country. Maybe you never thought of that.
     
  17. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    http://www.ccmep.org/usbombingwatch/2005.htm

    This site has not been updated since 02/05 and I can find nary a story from that time period about US military bombings. It all seems to be about insurgency car bombings. Let me know if you find more...

    Damn man I thought those insurgents were androids. The way they so callously and deliberately and intentionally kill Iraqi men, women and children I would have guessed they had no feelings whatsoever... just like androids.

    You, of course, completely ignore the Iraqi side of the story that wants us there to rout out the thugs and the murderers. Everybody wants the horror to stop but the real question is will a peacable lifestyle be more attainable if the insurgents prevail or if the US prevails. What's your call on that?
     
  18. plcmts17

    plcmts17 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,777
    Likes Received:
    179
    Sure basso, name calling will make your point since your arguements won't. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  19. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    I thought the bottom line was if we fought 'em over there in Iraq, we woudn't have to fight 'em over here.

    Got any tips from GlobalSecurity lately, basso?

    I am gonna buy me some more duct tapes today.
     
  20. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    Uhh, why would insurgents not be in the body count? Death is death.
     

Share This Page