1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

In Retrospect: Why did we sign Ariza?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by srrm, Jan 25, 2010.

?

What was the reasoning behind signing Ariza?

  1. We needed an SF after Artest left, and any player at the position would be satisfactory

    51 vote(s)
    14.9%
  2. DM wanted another asset specifically to trade for a better player

    29 vote(s)
    8.5%
  3. We got him for his age and athleticism, either to be a future Rocket or to trade

    202 vote(s)
    59.1%
  4. DM was impressed by Ariza’s hot 09 playoffs performance

    78 vote(s)
    22.8%
  5. We got him for his defense to play alongside Shane Battier

    53 vote(s)
    15.5%
  6. We got him for his defense to replace Battier in the next few years

    117 vote(s)
    34.2%
  7. Ariza is a Morey-ball player, and DM was thrilled to get him

    73 vote(s)
    21.3%
  8. We thought he could become a future star

    70 vote(s)
    20.5%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. RocketMadness

    RocketMadness Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    47
    I don't see him active on defense as much as I saw when he was in L.A. But, just give him some time people. He'll improve and be better next season or years to come.
     
  2. lunaticrocket

    lunaticrocket Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    6
    We just wanted to make sure we won the category "Most airballs per 48 minutes".

    I really liked the Trevor signing, but I must admit it is finally starting to piss me off. I like his defense, but I cannot understand why he shoots so many times during a game. I mean, he is a good passer and he drives the ball to the hoop pretty well too. But he is a terrible shooter, even when wide open. And he gets pissed off when teammates do not give him the ball.

    I really hope next year he proves me wrong and becomes the ideal complement for Yao.
     
  3. T-Slack

    T-Slack Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,893
    Likes Received:
    81
    1. I think cause of Yao and T mac basically lost for the season, Morey wanted to make a little buzz to make the fans excited.

    2. Morey got fooled by fool's gold by Ariza's play in the playoffs last year. You don't give someone that kind of cap killing money if he never averaged 10 points in his career. I but Arzia in the same category as Robert Horry, James Posey. Ariza's has good numbers, but he's forcing the action and trying to create when thats not his game. He should of signed with the Cavs so we would been able to keep some of our cap space.
     
  4. LCII

    LCII Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    395
    age and athleticism, impressed DM in the '09 playoffs (everyone was impressed, can't blame DM), thought he could become a star (or an offensive force at least).
     
  5. W22_STREAK

    W22_STREAK Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    616
    we are not trading him. ever.

    if we trade him, a part of my Rockets-fuelled body would have died.

    ariza is the real deal. trust me.

    Morey signed him because he is a star, esp on that MLE salary.

    Chauncey Billups. Chauncey Billups. Thats right. Thats what Ariza will become in regards to that MLE signing.

    If it meant giving up Ariza to get Iguodala, then its a no deal
     
  6. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    1,011
    C,G are the most plausible.


    F,H are very popular choices, but I do not see Ariza at any point in his career being 40% of the defender that Battier is, even in decline. He lacks those intangibles and knowledge of situational defenses to do what Shane does.

    Also, I do not ever see him becoming what Joe Johnson is. Johnson has outstanding great skill set and is a slightly above average outside shooter. Ariza just doesn't have the same kind of potential JJ had at the same age, and lacks the efficiency of him as well.
     
  7. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    No way. His contract isn't "fat" by NBA standards, especially considering how much he plays. I think morey thought there was a slim chance Ariza could develop into a 18-20 ppg guy in the right role, with the right coaching/environment to support him, BUT i think morey knew that was a small chance and the pay off would be Ariza being more of a 13-15 ppg player. that's a very realiztic expectation of Ariza if he's getting significant minutes with other scoring threats. A couple threes, one or two breakaways, some slashing buckets. Nothing too difficult for Ariza, just needed to play more.
     
  8. nolimitnp

    nolimitnp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,817
    Likes Received:
    706
    No one will deny or ever argue he has been horrid his first games as a Houston Rocket. But its not like his contract is complete poison. His jump shot can be improved with dedication in the gym this summer. Having Yao drawing teams leaving open shots can't hurt either. He's young, I'm certainly not ready to give up on the guy.
     
  9. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    for those questioning Morey's move, how about taking into consideration how bad Ariza looks in this role that is NOT for him? Things won't be like this if he had Yao or a tmac plike talent to play with. I cant believe some fans dont realize this. I mean, even chuck hayes looks like chump when he gets too many minutes at center and is expected to be involved in the offense signficantly, yet he looks great in a more limited role. If chuck was forced to shoot more because he got thrown into a similar role, we'd hate him too.
     
  10. vcchlw

    vcchlw Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,826
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    The fact that 22% of the voters thought he would be a future star explained all the Ariza bashing.
     
  11. W22_STREAK

    W22_STREAK Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    616
    keyword : "future"

    I think hes gonna become a star and I havent bashed him one bit
     
  12. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,174
    Likes Received:
    3,387
    I think this is complicating things unnecessarily.

    In Morey's own words, he felt

    A) Ariza's overall ability is worth the full MLE.
    B) Ariza has potential for growth which would then make him a bargain.

    Basically, Morey thought Ariza's floor was MLE, and ceiling being higher than that.

    You can argue if Ariza's play this year is worth a MLE contract. But you can't argue that Morey thought before the year that he was worth it.
     
  13. srrm

    srrm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,956
    Likes Received:
    307
    It certainly does explain some of it.
    There are two categories of people who might vote for this: those who still believe it and are being patient, and those who changed their minds after seeing his play.

    I don't necessarily disagree with the latter though, as I am losing some patience with him myself. As I said, even a better version of Pietrus would be a great addition to a Yao-centric team. Pietrus was such an effective 6th man for the Magic last year.
     
  14. srrm

    srrm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,956
    Likes Received:
    307
    This is true too. We have definitely been spoiled by the current group of players and their production/salary. For all the people that are saying he's not worth his MLE salary, I think we have to adjust our idea of how much production should be expected for some salary. The group we have now is a complete anomaly.

    But for the second point: by arguing that he is not worth the MLE contract after 3 months play, you have to consider the signing as a DM failure. Right?

    Though I admit that Ariza hasn't shown much development, 3 months is too soon. DM has not failed yet.
    If you credit Morey with being calculating and analytical, I think you have to credit him with looking into Ariza's career numbers showing some trend warranting his MLE/fat contract, not just Ariza's play last season&playoffs.
     
  15. davidxhz

    davidxhz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,846
    Likes Received:
    308
    Not just bad, It's VERY BAD..... We are gonna be screwed by this guy for FIVE YEARS.... I mean, literally, FIVE YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  16. davidxhz

    davidxhz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,846
    Likes Received:
    308
    He is getting more money than Landry, Aaron, Lowry etc, do you think he deserves it? When you get paid more, you assume more responsibility, that's why a lot of people choose that..
     
  17. RocketMania1991

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    124
    He will never be a star.

    Book it, write it down, print it out, frame it.
     
  18. srrm

    srrm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,956
    Likes Received:
    307
    See, these are the most popular options.
    The first one makes sense.

    But I don't see any indication that Trevor is Battier's replacement. Do they play the same position? Yes. Are they both known for defense? Yes. Are they both 'intangibles' guys? No!

    Battier is the glue-guy organizing team defense and plays spectacular individual defense. Trevor just plays passing lanes, and is an above average person defender. Can he organize defenses? Not yet, but he could well learn. And that is the point of getting him I think. He can learn from Battier over the next 2 seasons, but that has nothing to do with our championship push with Yao, or replacing Battier in the immediate future. Next season where I expect to have both Shane and Trevor, seems to me like the best chance to push for a championship, under the model we had last year: 2 nice wing defenders
     
  19. acsorelle4

    acsorelle4 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    373
    None of the above. The money was burning a hole in our pockets.
     
  20. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    i dont think it's that literal...it just means ariza will be taking on the same role Battier had on the court. He can still do that without intangibles and leadership that Battier had. I think Morey hopes the other player(s) he acquires will have leadership capabilities and glue guy mentality. We already have some though in lowry and chuck. Landry could develop into it. So it's more about Ariza being a defender who can feed off of what the "stars" will create. He's not as good defensively overall as battier, but i think morey decided he's good enough with some extra offense.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now