1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

IMHO, the growing frustration in America is about MORE than.....

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by BrotherFish, Mar 30, 2010.

  1. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28

    The point I am trying ot make is that just has you are supposed to have an emergengy fund for your personal finances, the government should have some leaway for unplanned national crisis--such as war. Now, I am sure everyone is going to jump on me about the Bush war plan and all--but lets stay focused on the issue at hand.

    Can anyone garentee that in the next 10 years there will be no possibility of war in another area of the world we are not currently involve in--no you can't. So, the CBO is saying that in the best case senerio, we will be using every tax dollar in 10 years to pay for entitlemetn and the interest only on the debt. You have left no room for national emergency contingenies. Once you outtax you people--where do you go from there but even more taxes on the top 5%. What you end up with is Calaforinia. There is no one left to tax and everyone is taxed out.

    But, my main focus was on the current CBO projections for the next 10 years. Lets focus on what are your thoughts on the future projections of the CBO? Are you ok with this amount of debt or do you think somehow it will go away or do we just keep printing more money?

    This country is financially going to hell in a hand basket unless we do something about it in November.

    Even the New York Times agrees with me. See the following link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/economy/30states.html
     
  2. uolj

    uolj Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    60
    That's not the best case scenario, that's the scenario if the policies from the previous administration and the first year of this administration aren't changed.
     
  3. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    [​IMG]
     
  4. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    yes,

    if we can pay for two wars, we can pay to take care of our people
     
  5. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Will you answer my questions or do you only have vague threats?
     
  6. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,369
    Likes Received:
    9,296
    i was commenting specifically on the scenario BF noted in his post. yes, i know the CBO issues revisions every year. my point was, Congress apparently didn't realize that HCR had SarBox ramifications, and now Waxman is calling CEOs in to 'splain themselves, when he should actually know the answer.
     
  7. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28
    Patients’ grasshopper, I am working on it.. :cool:
     
  8. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28
    Agreed 100%. Bush was a big part of this mess also!
     
  9. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471

    It is simply amazing to see the right run away from Bush and the last administration the way the right has.

    do you fanatics feel like a jilted lover or something?

    amazing
     
  10. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    How a New Jobless Era Will Transform America
    The Great Recession may be over, but this era of high joblessness is probably just beginning. Before it ends, it will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults. It will leave an indelible imprint on many blue-collar men. It could cripple marriage as an institution in many communities. It may already be plunging many inner cities into a despair not seen for decades. Ultimately, it is likely to warp our politics, our culture, and the character of our society for years to come.
     
  11. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28
    I think it's about time the silent majority started to voice their feelings about the direction of our country!


    Give me credit for warning you.... :grin: . But I thought you would have figured out from the elections results in New Jersey, Virginia, and Mass., that the political climate was changing?

    I was only creating bookends for the opposite viewpoints. It was only to start the discussion.

    The problem with entitlements is that good intentions have unintended consequences. For example, how is Social Security working for you? It was supposed to be a lockbox for the elderly, but its been raided so much there is nothing left. It’s bankrupt! I am all for Social Security, but it should have come with a legislation that forbids government to borrowing from it. It should have also allowed people to have limited option to invest their own money.

    --I am all for helping those in need for a short period of time to help them get through tough times or a lot of help for families with special needs children.
    --We just need to do a better job weeding out the career freeloaders. However, the extreme left depends on the freeloader" to keep them in office. Therefore, there is no incentive to really "teach them to fish"--progressives just want to hand out the "fish." It's just like those ducks at your local pond, when you show up anywhere near with a loaf of bread. It has just become habitual behavior. And "freeloading" term does not "only" apply to minorities, it even applies to those "raciest" small town folks in places in rural Indiana. Just go to any Wal-Mart on the last Friday of any month and it's packed with Government check freeloaders---and I am talking about BEFORE the rescission hit us--you will not find one single minority. I know all about the local "clubs" that still don't appreciate "minorities" showing up. This is not about race, it's about what is the core values and principles of our citizens. Unfortunately, as soon as anyone starts talking about "entitlement" vs. "taxpayers"--automatically, everyone assumes that person is raciest, right-wing nut, redneck and-- of course the SOP--"STUPID & UNEDUCATED"

    With state government control of entitlements, if you are not happy with them you can move to another state, but still keep the rights provided by the constitution.

    Sure, as soon as you show me a single person on the right who does not want to help those who are "truly" in need.

    I see what you did there. So I will call you on it: “Yes, it’s called the progressive judges.”

    The constitution should be used a “true north” compass. Keep in mind that little 17 page document resulted in the greatest nation in the history of the world. For example, universities do not teachconstitutional law anymore, they only study previous "cases". Therefore, all “new” judgments are just based basically on past cases and not per what the original constitution provided for us.

    I don't get where you get this from? The God of my faith believes that all men and women are created equal and have certain human rights--for further details, read the Declaration of Independence , Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

    See the Progressive Agenda and you will be lead to the smoking gun.

    Sam Malone. :p Are you for real? You ever seen rioting in the streets of any country and what happens to the shops? Look at LA during its riots? I would not have gone into a store and taken anything--even if there was no one looking--but that's just how I was raised. There are lots of people that will take anything that’s free-if given a chance.

    You are right, Obama is only for a short time, but the Obamacare entitlement is FOREVER!


    --You mean like PETA and burning of all those gas guzzlers?
    --All the voter intimidation violence by SIEU?
    --You mean like the violence what goes on at every G8 summit?
    --You mean how the media is biased in what they show of extremist on one side vs. the other?
    See current immigration reform debate-aka amnesty. Actually, I have no problem with allowing 12million illegal’s into this country—GRANTED they should go through an "Ellis Island" type program. They HAVE to take English courses and pass an English exam. Take courses on what it means to be an American and what this country stands for and learn the constitution. Assimilate into America culture—of course, there is nothing wrong with keeping your cultural traditions. My wife and I did and we only speak English at home with our kids—however, we still go and participate in our cultural events. There is no LAW against knowing more than one language. Assimilate and enjoy the freedom provide by this country—but never forget that FREEDOM is not FREE and it can be taken away from you.
    However, this is not what the Progressives want, they just want to bring in the illegal’s, give them all the rights of US citizens and encourage them NOT to assimilate--so they can keep getting the entitlement votes of the newly "suppressed" minority. This is a huge disservice to the new immigrants.

    See the following link from the New York Times my friend:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/economy/30states.html

    To be continued....
     
    #51 BrotherFish, Mar 30, 2010
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2010
  12. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28
    Are you for real? Compare the amount given to those in need by Americans to that of any country in the world. This should not even be a topic of discussion. I have head Obama is now pushing for gift donations to charities to be non-tax deductible. You already see, what ATT and other companies are doing--removing benefits to retirees. It’s a domino effect, force us to give and we will fight you tooth and nail.


    The viewpoints are meant to be bookends of opposite sides of the battle line.

    Constitution that created the most powerful country in the history in the world= 17 pages.
    Obamacare=2000+ pages.
    I admit, I believe in the tried and true "KISS" principle: "Keep It Simple Stupid". It has made me fairly successfully in my personal and professional life.


    I mean this all due respect, but I am only interested in your “side”, if it is the same viewpoint as that of Obama, Nancy and Reid. They are who I have a fundamental difference of opinion with. So, please provide the details of the political believes of Obama, Nancy and Reid and their political agenda. I am very interested in your thoughts of THEIR vision for this country.

    The organizer of the Coffee Party is one of Obama campaigns lead organizer. This group was started to only counter the Tea Party. However, just like talk radio, the progressive agenda has no true traction and following in the mainstream American society. See link below.
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/coffee-party-founder-is-obama-campaign-operative.html

    There is no doubt that there are those that want to rewrite the history of this great nation. See link: http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/currency/in-god-we-trust.shtml
    However, there are those of us that shall stand as “watchers in the night”, to be vigilant against those who will try to “fundamentally transform” our country-- while we are sleeping. America, do not fear, for those of us that were asleep have now awoken and are coming to your aid! (And yes, I know what you are going to say…)
    With all due respect, I guess I will just have to join all the other “uneducated” voters in New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts.

    Duly noted! Enjoyed the discussion! Hope you have not taken any of my opinions as a personal attack on you—this was not my intention.

    And to end on a positive note: At least, we have one thing in common—we both LOVE the Rockets!
     
  13. BrotherFish

    BrotherFish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    28

    I believe you misunderstand my stance, I still will vote for Bush over Gore or Kerry any day of the week and twice on Sundays. Bush main error was in trying to be a liberal in spending to appease the progressives. I am very happy with this stand on national security issues--and for that alone he will always have my thanks.

    Bush strayed from the fiscally responsible path. But, please don't mistake a minor family squabble for signs of divorce.
     
  14. Anticope

    Anticope Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    LOL, are you serious? Bush trying to be a liberal, I have seriously heard it all now.
     
  15. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    I might. I might not. I would like to see empirical data that suggests that term limits actually affect lawmaking in any significant way.

    I just cannot see what term limits had to do with this bill. If, as a lot of people suggest (overblown exaggeration IMO), this bill is wildly unpopular then the lack of term limits would have hindered its passage. The existence of term limits would have made its passage even more likely as Congress would not be worried about reading the political tea leaves.

    If we did this, what would the residents of those states do when there is a massive recession? Starve? Go homeless? There has to be a balance. That is what you are missing. In even the best planned out life, untoward things happen unexpectedly.
     
  16. rimbaud

    rimbaud Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 1999
    Messages:
    8,169
    Likes Received:
    676
    So the majority of both parties should agree before anything gets passed? Combine that with term limits, with congresspersons rotating in and out on alternating blocks, and pretty much nothing would pass ever again. That would be pretty awesome.

    You should re-read what you cite. Neither the Constitution nor Bill of Rights mentions women and the "all men are created equal" line comes from the Declaration of Independence which, of course, did not mean all men, much less women. It further was more a statement regarding the divine right of King and less about equal rights amongst all people. In other words, King George came from the position that God put him on Earth to rule and to rule as he pleased whereas the declaration...uh...declared that governments are formed and allowed to exist through the consent of the governed (which, again, did not mean all people at that time). The message was "God did not create George as superior to colonial governors"...not, "all humanity is deserving of equal rights."

    Perhaps these are minor points from your grand polemic(s) but my interests are confusing, my tolerance low, my mind sleepy, my cup empty, my wardrobe resplendent, my love fair as the true North wind...ah, to be a lad lolling about Glen Finglas with JEM of the PRB!
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    11,658
    Ding Ding Ding we have a winner!

    Go out on the street and ask people if they know the difference between something as basic as Medicare and Medicaid.

    Or which party voted for the largest entitlement legislation ever Medicare Part D.

    We're all ignorant about certain things but if you're going to have a strong opinion you would think a prerequisite should be research.
     
  18. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    11,658
    What cracks me up is they throw Bush under the bus and claim he acts like a liberal. However Reagan did step by step the same thing Bush did but he is a God and Bush is the devil.

    I think even the most myopic Con can agree that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was a mistake but 20 years ago Reagan wrote legislation that tried to repeal it, the Senate approved it but the Dem house shot it down.

    Reagan is just as responsible for this mess for pushing the disastrous ideaology that, despite the obvious proof to the contrary, many still perceive as succesful.

    You may not like Obama's agenda but all the GOP is offering is what we've seen fail time and time again. Either get on board or come up with something new.
     
  19. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    You shoulda been here for 1968. This climate is a bunch of posers compared to back when we used to really riot; Civil Rights, Viet Nam, abortion, The National Guard shooting at Americans, The Klu Klux Klan hanging people, Black Panthers, The SDS, The Watts Riots burning down Los Angeles, The Democratic Convention protests.

    p*****s.
     
  20. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    9,098
    "jesus christ". :rolleyes:
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now