1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

If teams are tanking for Wemby the Rockets should....?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DaDakota, Oct 5, 2022.

?

What would you do as teams position themselves to tank for Wemby/Henderson

Poll closed Dec 7, 2022.
  1. A. Take advantage of those rolling the dice on very low odds.

    50 vote(s)
    25.9%
  2. B. Tank with them - let's take our shot too

    143 vote(s)
    74.1%
  1. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    Whether one is pro-tank or anti-tank, the Rockets players and coaching staff are pro-win and it's hard to imagine this team finishing inside the top 5 worst records barring injury. Yes they are young, but compared to OKC, Orlando, Spurs, & Jazz the Rockets are looking like a far superior team. Then you look at teams like Detroit, Indiana, and Portland and you can see the Rockets in the mix of those teams.

    We're not getting the worst record in the league this year and very unlikely to be the worst 4. To do that, Jalen Green and/or Smith would have to underperform and it would raise questions about how good they really were.

    This team will finish 5-8, and that's not considering a borderline playoff team losing a star to injury and deciding to tank. So we're looking at a 6% - 10.5% chance of landing Wemby instead of a 14% chance. I can live with that.

    I was very happy we finished with the worst record last year and got Jabari. For this year, I think we're looking at a top 10 pick.

    My preference would be if the lottery weighted the records of the last 3 seasons of a team vs just the last (so 50%-30%-20%) which would make it less likely to tank since you'd have to be bad for multiple years to really get a shot. And a team should not be eligible to get 2 number 1 picks in 3 years either which would take Detroit and Orlando out.

    Bottom line, the Rockets don't have much of a chance to get him, have a really good young core, and I think this season you just let them play and grow and develop, but don't force them to lose unless it's towards the end of season and you have some injuries you can capitalize on.
     
    Corrosion, jbond77 and peleincubus like this.
  2. PatBev

    PatBev Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    4,560
    I don’t want to hinder the young fellas development

    I want best lineups and trying to compete

    I also don’t want to waste another year to not get a top 2 pick
     
  3. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,938
    Likes Received:
    14,008
    There is also a middle ground this year of expecting other teams to play significantly worse lineups than lineups with Jalen and Jabari early. I don't want Rockets to trade for vets or hold onto vets. I don't care about squeezing 5 extra wins out of this squad. I don't expect the Rockets to be on the treadmill of mediocrity if they try to develop their young players, but I would not consider it tanking (well at least to the same magnitude as I expect other teams to do).

    At most, the Rockets will tank when Green and Smith are on the bench. I don't expect this to be as "detrimental" to wins as it was at the end of last season. Rockets should end up in the bottom 6-8 range if they play Green and Smith a lot (Thinking 25-28 wins). I'm not sure playing Gordon until trade deadline changes that.

    I do not want to waste a year of develop of Green and Smith. If they are bad, it will work like tanking and Rockets have a shot at the bottom 3. If the Rockets are good, the development was likely worth losing a little lottery odds.

    On a side note, if Tari Eason has a great rookie season, it may be a lot more "detrimental" to the tanking movement than someone like Gordon.
     
    Corrosion and Y2JT like this.
  4. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,938
    Likes Received:
    14,008
    The Rockets coaches are pro-win within the confines of playing time/rotation directives from the front office (e.g., maybe more rest days for Gordon, who is played and how often in the second unit).
     
    Corrosion likes this.
  5. maj21

    maj21 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2021
    Messages:
    3,773
    Likes Received:
    3,376
    I think this topic is way overblown. This team is super young, so they just need to go play ball. Silas is coaching for his job possibly, and the players the want us to draft a guy to replace them. Enjoy the season, it’s gonna be exciting
     
    Y2JT and mightybosstone like this.
  6. mightybosstone

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,420
    Likes Received:
    5,747
    Everyone seems to think of this as black and white, either you tank or you go for the play-in. You're on Team Tank and you care more about rebuilding, or you want to win as many games as possible and tanking seems absurd to you.

    I think there's probably more of a gray area this season. There's a ton of young talent, and you want to see guys perform well and the team to perform better as a whole, but we can all acknowledge that this team is crazy young and inexperienced. The kids have the keys to the franchise. They're going to lose some games, and they didn't become a 50-win squad overnight.

    And unlike the last two years, there aren't a ton of veterans on this team they could feasibly dump to "tank" at the deadline. Even if they deal Gordon, he's the only real veteran in the rotation right now, so that's not really tanking. The only way they could truly tank is to rest starters down the stretch, which they could feasibly do to improve their draft odds.

    But either this team is going to be a bottom five squad vying for a top 2 pick again or it won't. And even if it's not, they're probably still in the bottom 10 with decent odds at a good pick. So to answer the question everyone's been arguing all offseason, I don't really support either side here. I just want to see the team prioritize the development of its young players first, and if you have a chance at a bottom five record OR to make the play-in later in the season, you decide then. But two preaseason games or some Wemby highlight videos shouldn't be enough to make that call right now.
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  7. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,214
    Likes Received:
    7,461
    7’4’’ player will have feet issue. They ALWAYS do. Why, he is going to have add weight and muscle to survive in the NBA. It is the extra weight that will hurt him. Name a 7’3’’ player that didn’t have injury issues with his knees or feet. 7’1’’ seems to be the cutoff to not have those issues.
     
  8. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,214
    Likes Received:
    7,461
    You are not going to out-tank OKC. The lottery is a crap shoot in the top 5 now.
     
    PatBev likes this.
  9. PatBev

    PatBev Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    4,560
    I’m honestly hoping the Spurs get Victor because I believe we’ll when 30 games
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  10. Believe It!

    Believe It! Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    5,830
    No telling how many teams have already decided to tank. Even with that possibility. I highly doubt that Stone AND more importantly TF have not already made it clear to the staff that drafting VW is the main priority. Along with probably 10 other FO's. One exec said after witnessing his game in Vegas that if it was allowed, they would trade 10 1st round picks for him. He's that good.
     
  11. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    35,197
    Likes Received:
    24,225
    This has been my take. To get to the bottom, both Jalen and Jabari, as well as some other key guys will have to underperform. And that's NOT a good thing. It means they are not as good as we hope. And what do we get? A 14% (or worse if not worst 3) chance of getting Wemby.
     
    Sweet Lou 4 2 likes this.
  12. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,214
    Likes Received:
    7,461
    And that exec would be an idiot. There is ALWAYS a once-in-a-lifetime prospect. Zion Williamson was an OIAG talent. How's that gone? You play your games and the let the chips fall. You don't tank on purpose for 1 player. If there were multiple great players, fine.
     
    Y2JT likes this.
  13. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    4,628
    Were the rockets idiots for doing that for hakeem? Were the spurs idiots for duncan?
     
  14. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,432
    Likes Received:
    26,035
    The rules were different back then. These days you can tank and still not get anyone you wanted. The Rockets tanked twice and never ended up with the #1 pick. Since the Rockets have quite a bit of young talent now, it makes more sense to try and win as much as possible.
     
  15. Williamson

    Williamson JOSH CHRISTOPHER ONLY FAN
    Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    15,276
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    Kareem was 7'2 and had unprecedently long and durable career.
     
  16. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,214
    Likes Received:
    7,461
    7'2' is the ceiling. He is the ONLY one i can think of that was 7'2'' and didn't have injury issues. Many more players were 7'1'' with great careers.
     
  17. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,214
    Likes Received:
    7,461
    Different times. Worst record=#1 overall pick. Rockets had the worst record and got the #3 pick. 2021 - worst record, #2 overall pick. You are not assured #1 overall anymore.
     
  18. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    4,628
    Neither of those teams were assured the first pick, they both got lucky. Odds were better but it wasn’t like football where worse record = first pick
     
  19. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    4,628
    If the question was 50 wins vs tanking I could understand trying to win, but that’s not the question. We’re talking about 28 wins vs 22 wins. Why lower your odds for a few meaningless wins?
     
  20. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,432
    Likes Received:
    26,035
    Why harm the development of your young players for the 7th pick instead of the 14th pick? The current team has too much talent and too many teams are outright tanking for the Rockets to end up with a bottom 3 record no matter what. You might as well try to win rather than teaching your core players to be losers. Attempt to take advantage of everyone tanking and try to make the play in. You still might not make it, but the Rockets have a better shot at the play in than the worst record.

    On top of that, the Rockets have tanked 2 years in a row, gotten the worst record, and still never gotten the top pick. The odds of ending up with Victor are simply too low to sabotage your team.
     
    TimDuncanDonaut and jbond77 like this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now