1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

If lusting after a woman is a sin, why did god make having sex so enticing?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by what, Dec 10, 2009.

Tags:
  1. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,086
    Likes Received:
    22,533
    Come on dude. There's a better way to say what you said that will lead to decent dialogue rather than annoyance (is that a word?).
     
  2. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    Agreed. Accept my apology.

    As for annoyance...I think yes... "A minor annoyance" Hmm...
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,619
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    I didn't misunderstand it.

    Mathloom asked me Why is desire altogether a sin? what makes you think that?

    I said Matthew 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
    28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

    I don't know how much clearly that can be.

    Then you come along and say, whoa buddy, If you are unmarried, there is no adultery. Thus, no sin. That quote earlier had to do with marriage.

    LOL!

    Okay. The original question was why do I feel desire is sin. Not why do I feel desire outside of marriage is a sin. So you are the one misinterpreting everything not me.

    I could have brought up fornication like Ms. Valdez did, and of course I knew about it, but why should I. I purposely kept going back to the same thing because you don't know what you are talking about honestly.

    I could have mentioned Lot's wife turned to a pillar of salt when she longed for the fornication of Sodom and Gomorrah. Where her longing for the city (not a man) was punished. So again desire. But I didn't because I didn't need that I answered the question Mathloom asked and I didn't need anything else.
     
  4. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,086
    Likes Received:
    22,533
    Ummm, you didn't answer my question. I just realized that what you meant to say is different than what you actually said.

    Your assertion is that desiring a woman is a sin. But I explained that that is the general rule, with the exceptions being:

    - Your wife.
    - Pursuing your desire from the point where you should be able to make a rational decision.

    This is my opinion, nothing more. But I highly doubt that any desire for any woman is a sin, because otherwise you would have to marry women that are undesirable to you - which is illogical. You would have to be accountable for being in the wrong place at the wrong time - which is illogical. Desiring a woman for sexual exploitation is a sin - yes, God gave you that tool, but the function of that tool is IMO to aid in marriage and procreation. Like any tool, it can be misused. I think you are accountable for the conscious useage of that tool (no pun intended).
     
  5. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,619
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    Mathloom, I don't really want to continue with this because it only makes it sound as if you are right and I didn't answer your question. But you still don't understand your own implication. The question was why give us the desire and then call it wrong. And, as much as you seem to want to explain it away, the bottom line is that's exactly what happened. God called desire wrong in marriage. If god magically took our desires away once we are married, maybe you have a point. But he doesn't. You seem to really want to emphasis that this is an expectation in marriage alone. Thus from you're point of view desire itself isn't wrong. It is only the marriage part that makes the difference. But the fact of the matter is that Matthew 5:27,28 is an extension of the previous statement of the ACT of adultery which now includes even the desire to commit adultery as well. I think it is clear that even desire itself is wrong. Well, you say, that doesn't mean desire is wrong it's because you are married and desire is an innocent bystander. If that was the case, then why would god bring up desire at all? You see, no matter how you explain it away Jesus said it himself and the fact that he said it so clearly yet you still want to deny desire isn't anything but a random part of a greater whole proves that you are trying to justify something to yourself against the word.

    You also seem to want to prove that I didn't know my own point and that I said something that I didn't really mean. But you discount or don't remember the fact that in my original post I brought up Tiger Woods (married) Letterman (Married). Bot seems to suggest that I never put the same restraint on desire that you seem to think I did.

    What really happened is this. I made a statement that you thought COULDN'T be right toward your own sensibilities and when I proved to you that it WAS right, you decided to come up with all of these restraints to levy against how I had to prove it to you for it to be right TO YOU.

    I can argue that point to, btw.

    Corinthians 6:9-10 warns us, "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners shall inherit the kingdom of God."

    So it is clear that fornicators will not inherit the kingdom of god. Of course fornication is an act of sex outside of marriage. So you would be emphasizing, I'm sure, that this is an act and not the same thing as lusting to fornicate. But then if that is the case, why would god give a man who is not married the ability to lust after a woman and not a married man to. Isn't that being a respecter of person's?

    Then I am sure you might get on a whole kick about what is lusting exactly. An argument that I am not going to engage in because it is too up for interpretation.
     
  6. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    and the words in red say:

    Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible." Matt 19:25-27
     
  7. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,985
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    Paging imadrummer2k: you and I are needed for a mandatory marriage joke in aisle D&D! :grin:
     
  8. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,086
    Likes Received:
    22,533
    Ok, first and foremost I have to be clear that I'm not Christian. I'm discussing my views of the bible. I am far below a rookie in that category.

    Yet I can see that what you're saying does not make sense. Here are several examples showing that intent is what matters:

    You understand here that God will judge you by your intention, right? It's about the heart dude. This is NOT a game of technicalities. He put the desire in you, yes. But you are assuming that the desire thing is almost always bad. In reality, it is never bad unless your INTENT is bad. Your intent is in your hands. This is why there is a judgement day. To judge what you did when you had jealousy in your heart. To judge what you did when you had lust in your heart. To judge what you did when you had anything in your heart.

    I would argue based on this that putting the desire in you increasing your ceiling for doing good. If you never had the desire, then you never had the chance to prove your faith by dealing with it.

    The sin is not desire. The sin is what you do with desire. If Jesus PBUH wanted you to live by technicalities, the Old Testament would more than suffice. According to Christianity, he taught you how to use your heart rather than just the in and outs of the law.

    You're portraying some unfair scenario. But the scenario you are describing will not go in the record books as "FAIL". Heck, even if you do mess up, maybe that is a lesson to you.

    The idea is faith. If you believe God said it, then it can't be wrong. Your goal should be to try to strengthen your belief that God said it. Believe me you are not equipped to go through a tick-box exercise on God's word and determine whether He passed or failed. There are some things you don't understand and won't understand. That's faith.

    You are absolutely correct about one thing. If we can't come to an agreement that you won't be "judged" for something out of your control, then I have no value to you and I recommend you speak to someone more knowledgeable than me. Thanks for the discussion anyway.
     
  9. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,619
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    I told you you'd be bringing up intention or as I called it interpretation. LOL. Look, I realize that god has mercy on us. If he didn't nobody would be saved. Friends? LOL
     
  10. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    There are though several sex acts and practices that have a 0.0% of pregnancy but I am presuming that even if someone were to limit themselves to only those that that would still be considered sinful if practiced outside of a marriage.
     
  11. T-Yao

    T-Yao Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,399
    Likes Received:
    55
    Very well said.
     
  12. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,217
    Likes Received:
    18,217
    Last response to your original question.

    Apparently, you believe desire is a sin is because you have been instilled with a repressive set of core beliefs that inhibit you from enjoying a very pleasurable experience.
     
  13. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,619
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    Absolutely not. Find the response where I said anything about ENJOYING sex is a sin. I said that I have been programmed to believe that lusting after women is a sin based on the bible.

    What I said was IF procreation is the only way a person can have sex and not sin, there has to be a disconnect somewhere because then you get into the idea that desire altogether.

    Notice the word "if" in the question. That should clue you into the fact that it was not my claim. That claim being enjoying sex rather than simply using sex for procreation was the only way you could have it and not sin. Instead, you could interpret what I saying this way: that I believe that desire is an overwhelming factor in having sex and if that is the case, which is what i believe, then we are all doomed to fail if the idea of procreation for sex only is the goal of sex. Remember though, that was not the way I defined the desire I was referring to in my initial claim. The desire I was referring to was the one when a man lusts after women BEFORE the act of sex, again that has nothing to do with the pleasurable nature of sex at all.
     
  14. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,217
    Likes Received:
    18,217
    Sorry for getting involved.

    My honest advice: while the bible is god's word to believers, it was written by men who interpreted their "visions" within the context of their own era and understanding. For example: prior to refrigeration, eating pork could kill you; a good way to keep people from dieing was to make it forbidden.

    Trying to extrapolate biblical lessons within the context of today's world is a daunting task. There are many competing religious beliefs out there ready and willing to use and subvert the faithful to their own end. Often at the expense of the believer.

    Good luck sorting things out.
     
  15. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,086
    Likes Received:
    22,533
    I don't believe there's a 0%. Take pulling out for example. That's 0%. But how many people plan to pull out but mess up in the heat of things? So it's not 0%.

    I'll be honest with you here. In Islam, there is far more to consider. Many Muslims consider that you can have a sort of "temporary" marriage which equates to dating. The idea is that you enter into an agreement with the other person which says "no long-term commitment UNLESS something happens (pregnancy, death, etc)". Key factor here being that it still governs in the "in case **** happens" way.

    For me, it is a sin unless you sincerely accept the responsibility which comes with it - that responsibility includes consent, children, potential reputational damage, etc, tons of things to consider in Islam. A piece of paper won't change that.

    Would it be considered a sin by the majority? Yes. We do have to maintain some order I suppose. Do I personally fear God based on a piece of paper rather than what's in my heart? Heck no. But everyone should be able to be at peace with what they're doing, not just listen to the status quo.
     
  16. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    I'm talking about non-vaginal sex.
     
  17. JeopardE

    JeopardE Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,418
    Likes Received:
    246
    For a non-Christian, I have to say you're doing better at reading and understanding God's word than many of us Christians do. Keep studying... when you find the truth it won't come from any man, it'll come from God himself.
     
  18. DudeWah

    DudeWah Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    9,643
    Likes Received:
    3,523
    I just read through this entire thread and I just want to make a few points:


    1. Most Catholics I know don't know **** about all this schedule stuff you guys are talking about. 90% of the Catholic population in my town will tell you the "birth control is bad" thing. And it is not just my town. It seems that there's many teachings that not too many people know about.

    2. What's the stance on anal/oral sex?? Is that a sin as well?? If so, that pretty much throws out half the stuff said in this thread.
     
  19. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    FWIW, I used the "pull out" method for over a decade and the only time it failed was after my wife had our first. It is remarkably effective if the man is committed to pulling the ripcord, so to speak.
     
  20. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    I think my wife's point is insightful, per usual. There is a difference between seeing a beautiful woman and wanting to start a relationship with her because her sexuality is enticing, and seeing a beautiful woman and wanting to do unspeakable things with her and then get out of Dodge. The latter would be lust in my estimation, but not the former. Using that as a definition for reading Scripture, it would be a requirement to behave compassionately in your love life. That seems reasonable.
     

Share This Page